OTCMKTS:ASGLY

AGC Competitors

$9.14
+0.07 (+0.77 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$9.11
Now: $9.14
$9.25
50-Day Range
$7.37
MA: $8.14
$9.49
52-Week Range
$4.30
Now: $9.14
$9.49
Volume7,864 shs
Average Volume6,293 shs
Market Capitalization$10.39 billion
P/E Ratio38.08
Dividend Yield1.53%
Beta0.8

Competitors

AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) Vs. SMCAY, VWDRY, CMPGY, PDYPY, SVNDY, and SCHYY

Should you be buying ASGLY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "private households" are considered alternatives and competitors to AGC, including SMC (SMCAY), Vestas Wind Systems A/S (VWDRY), Compass Group (CMPGY), Flutter Entertainment (PDYPY), Seven & i (SVNDY), and Sands China (SCHYY).

SMC (OTCMKTS:SMCAY) and AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

SMC pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. AGC pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. SMC pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AGC pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SMC and AGC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SMC$4.84 billion8.48$1.02 billion$0.7640.05
AGC$13.93 billion0.75$408.80 million$0.3724.70

SMC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AGC. AGC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SMC and AGC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SMC20.08%8.17%7.34%
AGC2.05%2.36%1.21%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.8% of SMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of AGC shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

SMC has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AGC has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for SMC and AGC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SMC01102.50
AGC00203.00

Summary

SMC beats AGC on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vestas Wind Systems A/S (OTCMKTS:VWDRY) and AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Vestas Wind Systems A/S has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AGC has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Vestas Wind Systems A/S and AGC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Vestas Wind Systems A/S3.12%13.89%3.16%
AGC2.05%2.36%1.21%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of Vestas Wind Systems A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of AGC shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Vestas Wind Systems A/S and AGC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vestas Wind Systems A/S$13.61 billion2.98$788.48 million$1.3350.39
AGC$13.93 billion0.75$408.80 million$0.3724.70

Vestas Wind Systems A/S has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AGC. AGC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vestas Wind Systems A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Vestas Wind Systems A/S pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. AGC pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Vestas Wind Systems A/S pays out 21.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AGC pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Vestas Wind Systems A/S and AGC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Vestas Wind Systems A/S25702.36
AGC00203.00

Summary

Vestas Wind Systems A/S beats AGC on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compass Group (OTCMKTS:CMPGY) and AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Compass Group has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AGC has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Compass Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of AGC shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Compass Group and AGC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Compass GroupN/AN/AN/A
AGC2.05%2.36%1.21%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Compass Group and AGC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Group$25.75 billion1.52$169.70 million$0.2491.54
AGC$13.93 billion0.75$408.80 million$0.3724.70

AGC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Compass Group. AGC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Compass Group and AGC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Compass Group38602.18
AGC00203.00

Given Compass Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Compass Group is more favorable than AGC.

Summary

Compass Group beats AGC on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) and Flutter Entertainment (OTCMKTS:PDYPY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for AGC and Flutter Entertainment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AGC00203.00
Flutter Entertainment34402.09

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of AGC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Flutter Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AGC has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AGC and Flutter Entertainment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AGC$13.93 billion0.75$408.80 million$0.3724.70
Flutter Entertainment$2.73 billion13.99$183.87 million$1.9157.12

AGC has higher revenue and earnings than Flutter Entertainment. AGC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flutter Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AGC and Flutter Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AGC2.05%2.36%1.21%
Flutter EntertainmentN/AN/AN/A

AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) and Seven & i (OTCMKTS:SVNDY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for AGC and Seven & i, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AGC00203.00
Seven & i00103.00

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.1% of AGC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Seven & i shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AGC and Seven & i's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AGC$13.93 billion0.75$408.80 million$0.3724.70
Seven & i$61.13 billion0.62$2.01 billion$1.5114.23

Seven & i has higher revenue and earnings than AGC. Seven & i is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

AGC has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seven & i has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

AGC pays an annual dividend of $0.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Seven & i pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. AGC pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Seven & i pays out 21.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares AGC and Seven & i's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AGC2.05%2.36%1.21%
Seven & i3.02%9.95%4.43%

Summary

Seven & i beats AGC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

AGC (OTCMKTS:ASGLY) and Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for AGC and Sands China, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AGC00203.00
Sands China01102.50

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AGC and Sands China's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AGC$13.93 billion0.75$408.80 million$0.3724.70
Sands China$8.81 billion4.28$2.03 billion$2.5118.57

Sands China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AGC. Sands China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AGC and Sands China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AGC2.05%2.36%1.21%
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of AGC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

AGC has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sands China has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AGC beats Sands China on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


AGC Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
SMC logo
SMCAY
SMC
1.3$30.44+0.8%$41.01 billion$4.84 billion42.87Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Vestas Wind Systems A/S logo
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
1.2$67.02+4.0%$40.61 billion$13.61 billion76.16Analyst Report
Gap Down
Compass Group logo
CMPGY
Compass Group
0.8$21.97+1.6%$39.19 billion$25.75 billion91.54Increase in Short Interest
Flutter Entertainment logo
PDYPY
Flutter Entertainment
0.4$109.10+2.8%$38.23 billion$2.73 billion57.12Decrease in Short Interest
Seven & i logo
SVNDY
Seven & i
1.6$21.49+4.9%$38.02 billion$61.13 billion22.86High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Sands China logo
SCHYY
Sands China
0.9$46.61+0.0%$37.71 billion$8.81 billion18.57Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Kuehne + Nagel International logo
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International
0.9$61.68+0.7%$36.92 billion$21.23 billion45.69Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Sandvik AB (publ) logo
SDVKY
Sandvik AB (publ)
0.8$29.04+2.7%$36.43 billion$10.92 billion54.79Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) logo
HNNMY
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.7$4.79+1.3%$34.98 billion$24.63 billion159.67
Experian logo
EXPGY
Experian
1.1$37.72+2.3%$34.60 billion$5.18 billion36.98Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Japan Tobacco logo
JAPAY
Japan Tobacco
1.2$9.56+0.4%$33.91 billion$19.96 billion12.58
Techtronic Industries logo
TTNDY
Techtronic Industries
0.2$88.81+1.2%$32.55 billion$7.67 billion0.00
Amadeus IT Group logo
AMADY
Amadeus IT Group
0.5$70.16+1.1%$31.61 billion$6.25 billion-241.92
CK Hutchison logo
CKHUY
CK Hutchison
0.7$8.19+0.7%$31.58 billion$38.34 billion0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) logo
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
1.2$14.92+0.6%$31.48 billion$9.95 billion36.39Decrease in Short Interest
Swire Pacific logo
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
1.6$7.96+1.0%$30.94 billion$10.93 billion3.17Decrease in Short Interest
Fujitsu logo
FJTSY
Fujitsu
0.9$29.93+0.3%$30.33 billion$35.49 billion22.67Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Ashtead Group logo
ASHTY
Ashtead Group
1.2$260.87+2.1%$29.30 billion$5.84 billion36.03Analyst Report
News Coverage
Zalando logo
ZLNDY
Zalando
0.4$54.92+3.4%$28.66 billion$7.26 billion249.62Analyst Downgrade
Gap Down
Sampo Oyj logo
SAXPY
Sampo Oyj
0.8$24.43+1.7%$27.36 billion$12.62 billion19.09
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions logo
MGDDY
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
1.5$29.94+0.7%$26.70 billion$27.03 billion13.80
Associated British Foods logo
ASBFY
Associated British Foods
0.9$33.52+1.1%$26.54 billion$18.00 billion31.92Decrease in Short Interest
China CITIC Bank logo
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank
0.9$10.79+0.0%$26.40 billion$47.62 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
Wilmar International logo
WLMIY
Wilmar International
0.7$41.31+0.0%$26.10 billion$42.64 billion20.25Increase in Short Interest
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) logo
SNPTF
Sunny Optical Technology (Group)
0.5$23.18+0.0%$25.42 billion$5.48 billion0.00Analyst Revision
Unicharm logo
UNICY
Unicharm
0.9$8.20+1.1%$24.35 billion$6.55 billion63.08
Kerry Group logo
KRYAY
Kerry Group
1.2$132.51+1.6%$23.42 billion$8.11 billion30.05Analyst Upgrade
Gap Up
BAE Systems logo
BAESY
BAE Systems
1.4$29.00+2.1%$23.36 billion$22.52 billion14.22Analyst Report
News Coverage
UniCredit logo
UNCFF
UniCredit
1.2$10.33+8.6%$23.14 billion$25.52 billion10.76News Coverage
Gap Down
Shimano logo
SMNNY
Shimano
0.5$24.91+0.8%$23.09 billion$3.33 billion41.84Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
China Mengniu Dairy logo
CIADY
China Mengniu Dairy
0.9$57.75+0.0%$22.80 billion$11.44 billion37.99Analyst Upgrade
Ocado Group logo
OCDDY
Ocado Group
0.4$61.25+2.0%$22.63 billion$2.26 billion-80.59High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
SGS logo
SGSOY
SGS
1.3$29.47+1.3%$22.30 billion$6.64 billion33.11Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Sysmex logo
SSMXY
Sysmex
0.6$52.07+0.2%$21.81 billion$2.78 billion78.89
Suzuki Motor logo
SZKMY
Suzuki Motor
1.5$172.91+0.5%$21.23 billion$32.03 billion20.51Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Nomura Research Institute logo
NRILY
Nomura Research Institute
1.1$31.34+0.0%$20.08 billion$4.87 billion36.87Decrease in Short Interest
Rakuten logo
RKUNY
Rakuten
0.6$12.69+0.3%$19.99 billion$11.60 billion-20.80Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Eisai logo
ESALY
Eisai
1.3$66.86+0.1%$19.83 billion$6.40 billion17.28Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Secom logo
SOMLY
Secom
1.3$21.20+0.4%$19.78 billion$9.75 billion25.85News Coverage
Ferrovial logo
FRRVY
Ferrovial
0.5$26.68+0.8%$19.55 billion$6.78 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Deutsche Wohnen logo
DWHHF
Deutsche Wohnen
0.9$54.19+4.4%$19.49 billion$937.88 million15.85Gap Down
Eurofins Scientific logo
ERFSF
Eurofins Scientific
0.9$107.50+0.7%$19.14 billion$5.19 billion47.57News Coverage
Sino Biopharmaceutical logo
SBMFF
Sino Biopharmaceutical
0.8$1.00+0.0%$18.88 billion$3.51 billion0.00
OMRON logo
OMRNY
OMRON
1.0$82.95+1.1%$17.11 billion$6.24 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
NN Group logo
NNGRY
NN Group
1.1$25.49+1.6%$16.83 billion$22.92 billion7.91
OMV Aktiengesellschaft logo
OMVJF
OMV Aktiengesellschaft
1.0$51.22+0.0%$16.72 billion$26.28 billion-51.74Analyst Revision
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock logo
SGTZY
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock
0.1$4.60+0.0%$16.43 billion$28.13 billion0.00
Atlantia logo
ATASY
Atlantia
0.6$9.77+0.9%$16.14 billion$14.13 billion108.56Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group logo
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
1.2$16.10+4.9%$16.10 billion$7.26 billion43.51Analyst Revision
Gap Up
bioMérieux logo
BMXMF
bioMérieux
0.5$134.50+1.9%$15.92 billion$3.00 billion52.13
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.