OTCMKTS:BIREF

Birchcliff Energy Competitors

$2.30
-0.03 (-1.41 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 05:19 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.29
Now: $2.30
$2.35
50-Day Range
$2.05
MA: $2.26
$2.59
52-Week Range
$0.78
Now: $2.30
$2.75
Volume69,859 shs
Average Volume124,098 shs
Market Capitalization$611.13 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield0.86%
BetaN/A

Competitors

Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) Vs. RRC, MUR, AETUF, CPG, BSM, and SM

Should you be buying BIREF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Birchcliff Energy, including Range Resources (RRC), Murphy Oil (MUR), ARC Resources (AETUF), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), Black Stone Minerals (BSM), and SM Energy (SM).

Range Resources (NYSE:RRC) and Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Range Resources and Birchcliff Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Range Resources313602.14
Birchcliff Energy02802.80

Range Resources currently has a consensus target price of $9.56, indicating a potential upside of 9.13%. Birchcliff Energy has a consensus target price of $3.95, indicating a potential upside of 71.96%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Range Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Range Resources and Birchcliff Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Range Resources-125.90%-0.26%-0.09%
Birchcliff Energy-22.14%-2.44%-1.35%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.8% of Range Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Range Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Range Resources and Birchcliff Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Range Resources$2.83 billion0.80$-1,716,300,000.00$0.4021.90
Birchcliff Energy$462.38 million1.32$-41,740,000.00N/AN/A

Birchcliff Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Range Resources.

Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) and Murphy Oil (NYSE:MUR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Birchcliff Energy and Murphy Oil, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Birchcliff Energy02802.80
Murphy Oil27602.27

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of $3.95, indicating a potential upside of 71.96%. Murphy Oil has a consensus target price of $15.7667, indicating a potential upside of 0.62%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Profitability

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and Murphy Oil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Birchcliff Energy-22.14%-2.44%-1.35%
Murphy Oil-46.10%-3.06%-1.40%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

78.6% of Murphy Oil shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of Murphy Oil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and Murphy Oil's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy$462.38 million1.32$-41,740,000.00N/AN/A
Murphy Oil$2.83 billion0.85$1.15 billion$0.8718.00

Murphy Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy.

Dividends

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Murphy Oil pays out 57.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Murphy Oil is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Birchcliff Energy beats Murphy Oil on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) and ARC Resources (OTCMKTS:AETUF) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Birchcliff Energy and ARC Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Birchcliff Energy02802.80
ARC Resources001003.00

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of $3.95, indicating a potential upside of 71.96%. ARC Resources has a consensus target price of $10.8125, indicating a potential upside of 73.53%. Given ARC Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ARC Resources is more favorable than Birchcliff Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and ARC Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Birchcliff Energy-22.14%-2.44%-1.35%
ARC Resources-65.18%1.43%0.80%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and ARC Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy$462.38 million1.32$-41,740,000.00N/AN/A
ARC Resources$792.18 million2.63$-20,800,000.00N/AN/A

ARC Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy.

Dividends

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. ARC Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%.

Summary

ARC Resources beats Birchcliff Energy on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Birchcliff Energy and Crescent Point Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Birchcliff Energy02802.80
Crescent Point Energy02802.80

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of $3.95, indicating a potential upside of 71.96%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus target price of $6.5556, indicating a potential upside of 81.09%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Birchcliff Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Birchcliff Energy-22.14%-2.44%-1.35%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and Crescent Point Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy$462.38 million1.32$-41,740,000.00N/AN/A
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.84$-778,700,000.00$0.546.72

Birchcliff Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crescent Point Energy.

Dividends

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Crescent Point Energy beats Birchcliff Energy on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Birchcliff Energy and Black Stone Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Birchcliff Energy02802.80
Black Stone Minerals01113.00

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of $3.95, indicating a potential upside of 71.96%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.71%. Given Birchcliff Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and Black Stone Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Birchcliff Energy-22.14%-2.44%-1.35%
Black Stone Minerals31.42%16.85%9.18%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

19.1% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and Black Stone Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy$462.38 million1.32$-41,740,000.00N/AN/A
Black Stone Minerals$487.82 million4.19$214.37 million$1.168.50

Black Stone Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Birchcliff Energy.

Dividends

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Black Stone Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Black Stone Minerals beats Birchcliff Energy on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Birchcliff Energy (OTCMKTS:BIREF) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

68.9% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of SM Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Birchcliff Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. SM Energy pays out -4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Birchcliff Energy and SM Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Birchcliff Energy02802.80
SM Energy27502.21

Birchcliff Energy presently has a consensus target price of $3.95, indicating a potential upside of 71.96%. SM Energy has a consensus target price of $10.1250, indicating a potential downside of 37.50%. Given Birchcliff Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Birchcliff Energy is more favorable than SM Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and SM Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Birchcliff Energy-22.14%-2.44%-1.35%
SM Energy-55.76%-1.40%-0.60%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Birchcliff Energy and SM Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birchcliff Energy$462.38 million1.32$-41,740,000.00N/AN/A
SM Energy$1.59 billion1.17$-187,000,000.00($0.48)-33.77

Birchcliff Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SM Energy.

Summary

SM Energy beats Birchcliff Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Birchcliff Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Range Resources logo
RRC
Range Resources
1.5$8.76-6.1%$2.41 billion$2.83 billion-0.86Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Murphy Oil logo
MUR
Murphy Oil
1.7$15.66-6.6%$2.41 billion$2.83 billion-2.30Analyst Report
News Coverage
ARC Resources logo
AETUF
ARC Resources
1.7$5.90-5.6%$2.20 billion$792.18 million-4.13Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Crescent Point Energy logo
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
1.8$3.63-5.0%$2.11 billion$2.51 billion-0.79
Black Stone Minerals logo
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
1.5$9.86-2.4%$2.04 billion$487.82 million18.60
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$16.21-4.6%$1.95 billion$1.59 billion-2.62Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
1.9$33.98-3.0%$1.57 billion$671.57 million-0.65Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Enerplus logo
ERF
Enerplus
2.2$5.03-4.0%$1.29 billion$945.62 million-1.32
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.6$4.78-3.3%$1.15 billion$768.69 million-9.19Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
1.0$3.94-6.9%$1.10 billion$944.33 million-1.85
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.6$6.50-5.5%$1.09 billion$1.27 billion-0.94Upcoming Earnings
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.2$2.49-7.2%$1.09 billion$1.51 billion-2.22
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.8$15.93-3.8%$1.01 billion$628.91 million-8.47
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.8$11.14-5.5%$910.22 million$927.62 million-65.53Unusual Options Activity
Brigham Minerals logo
MNRL
Brigham Minerals
1.9$15.58-2.9%$883.79 million$101.51 million-779.00Increase in Short Interest
Northern Oil and Gas logo
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas
1.5$12.27-5.3%$779.88 million$472.40 million-0.55
Par Pacific logo
PARR
Par Pacific
1.3$14.25-5.9%$769.63 million$5.40 billion-3.15
Contango Oil & Gas logo
MCF
Contango Oil & Gas
0.5$3.56-4.8%$708.96 million$76.51 million-1.50Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.3$29.94-7.7%$672.06 million$313.22 million15.35
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.4$1.70-1.2%$657.20 million$28.77 million-1.73Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Kimbell Royalty Partners logo
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners
1.8$10.01-0.5%$597.58 million$108.22 million-1.84Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Genel Energy logo
GEGYY
Genel Energy
1.3$2.08-0.0%$580.38 million$377.20 million4.24
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.2$6.61-5.9%$546.63 million$191.26 million-26.44Gap Up
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.0$14.21-1.2%$498.70 million$78.80 million17.99
Berry logo
BRY
Berry
1.4$5.79-6.7%$497.31 million$559.41 million-2.24Analyst Upgrade
Advantage Oil & Gas logo
AAVVF
Advantage Oil & Gas
1.4$2.46-3.8%$479.66 million$207.42 million-1.98Gap Up
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
0.9$3.04-5.6%$453.95 million$534.90 million2.98
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$34.01-5.6%$438.73 million$837.28 million-0.50
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$22.22-0.8%$403.65 million$848.30 million18.07
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.5$4.34-4.6%$390.93 million$68.46 million43.40Analyst Revision
DGRLY
Delek Group
0.6$3.25-4.6%$389.47 million$2.52 billion0.00
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.2$2.47-1.2%$312.23 million$1.04 billion-2.11
TGC
Tengasco
0.7$23.56-6.5%$251.74 million$4.91 million-124.00Gap Up
Vista Oil & Gas logo
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.7$2.71-1.5%$233.10 million$415.98 million-1.77Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.3$1.48-8.1%$232.50 million$750,000.00-7.40Gap Up
Gran Tierra Energy logo
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
1.3$0.58-5.0%$222.65 million$570.98 million-0.30
Ring Energy logo
REI
Ring Energy
0.6$1.98-10.1%$216.22 million$195.70 million-1.51
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$12.42-1.5%$192.98 million$471.22 million-1.10Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Battalion Oil logo
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$10.80-2.0%$179.26 millionN/A-0.99
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
1.2$2.37-1.7%$134.36 million$84.52 million-3.16Analyst Report
Gap Down
Goodrich Petroleum logo
GDP
Goodrich Petroleum
1.9$9.66-3.5%$134.02 million$127.91 million-4.01Analyst Revision
News Coverage
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$3.62-2.5%$132.16 million$266.85 million-0.24
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.50-2.7%$111.72 million$278.93 million-1.32
Evolution Petroleum logo
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
1.7$3.13-1.6%$106.50 million$29.60 million-24.08
AMPY
Amplify Energy
0.9$2.43-9.5%$101.00 million$275.58 million-0.20Gap Up
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$8.05-0.2%$97.76 million$288.63 million-0.31News Coverage
PEDEVCO logo
PED
PEDEVCO
0.9$1.11-5.4%$92.95 million$12.97 million-7.93Decrease in Short Interest
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
1.0$3.86-2.3%$92.59 million$26.69 million64.34
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$46.59-1.3%$91.72 million$104.82 million0.00Gap Up
Obsidian Energy logo
OBELF
Obsidian Energy
0.1$1.24-4.9%$90.82 million$315 million-0.09Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/20/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.