S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.10 (-1.64%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.10 (-1.64%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.10 (-1.64%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.10 (-1.64%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
Log in
OTCMKTS:BLMC

Biloxi Marsh Lands Competitors

$3.50
-0.24 (-6.42 %)
(As of 03/3/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.50
Now: $3.50
$3.50
50-Day Range
$2.89
MA: $3.61
$4.78
52-Week Range
$1.37
Now: $3.50
$4.89
Volume509 shs
Average Volume504 shs
Market Capitalization$8.77 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield2.67%
Beta0.78

Competitors

Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) Vs. ARCC, PSEC, GBDC, FFXDF, TSLX, and NMFC

Should you be buying BLMC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Biloxi Marsh Lands, including Ares Capital (ARCC), Prospect Capital (PSEC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Fairfax India (FFXDF), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), and New Mountain Finance (NMFC).

Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.3% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Biloxi Marsh Lands and Ares Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Biloxi Marsh Lands0000N/A
Ares Capital02802.80

Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $16.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.56%. Given Ares Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Risk & Volatility

Biloxi Marsh Lands has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Biloxi Marsh Lands and Ares Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Biloxi Marsh Lands-4,807.14%N/AN/A
Ares Capital21.28%10.05%4.63%

Dividends

Biloxi Marsh Lands pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Ares Capital pays out 84.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ares Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Biloxi Marsh Lands and Ares Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Biloxi Marsh Lands$20,000.00438.38$-3,030,000.00N/AN/A
Ares Capital$1.53 billion5.13$793 million$1.899.80

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Summary

Ares Capital beats Biloxi Marsh Lands on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) and Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Prospect Capital and Biloxi Marsh Lands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Prospect Capital20001.00
Biloxi Marsh Lands0000N/A

Prospect Capital currently has a consensus target price of $4.50, suggesting a potential downside of 38.61%. Given Prospect Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Profitability

This table compares Prospect Capital and Biloxi Marsh Lands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Prospect Capital22.08%8.16%4.72%
Biloxi Marsh Lands-4,807.14%N/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Prospect Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.8%. Biloxi Marsh Lands pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Prospect Capital pays out 100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Prospect Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Prospect Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Prospect Capital and Biloxi Marsh Lands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Prospect Capital$623.53 million4.53$-16,220,000.00$0.7210.18
Biloxi Marsh Lands$20,000.00438.38$-3,030,000.00N/AN/A

Biloxi Marsh Lands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Prospect Capital.

Risk and Volatility

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Biloxi Marsh Lands has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats Biloxi Marsh Lands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Biloxi Marsh Lands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Golub Capital BDC18.35%7.95%3.99%
Biloxi Marsh Lands-4,807.14%N/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Biloxi Marsh Lands' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golub Capital BDC$298.95 million8.36$54.87 million$1.2212.25
Biloxi Marsh Lands$20,000.00438.38$-3,030,000.00N/AN/A

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Dividends

Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Biloxi Marsh Lands pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Golub Capital BDC pays out 95.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Golub Capital BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Golub Capital BDC and Biloxi Marsh Lands, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Golub Capital BDC02102.33
Biloxi Marsh Lands0000N/A

Golub Capital BDC presently has a consensus target price of $11.75, indicating a potential downside of 21.40%. Given Golub Capital BDC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Volatility & Risk

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Biloxi Marsh Lands has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats Biloxi Marsh Lands on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fairfax India (OTCMKTS:FFXDF) and Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Fairfax India has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Biloxi Marsh Lands has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fairfax India and Biloxi Marsh Lands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fairfax IndiaN/A-3.61%-2.85%
Biloxi Marsh Lands-4,807.14%N/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Fairfax India and Biloxi Marsh Lands, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fairfax India00103.00
Biloxi Marsh Lands0000N/A

Given Fairfax India's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Fairfax India is more favorable than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fairfax India and Biloxi Marsh Lands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fairfax India$712.69 million2.60$516.34 millionN/AN/A
Biloxi Marsh Lands$20,000.00438.38$-3,030,000.00N/AN/A

Fairfax India has higher revenue and earnings than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Fairfax India shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fairfax India beats Biloxi Marsh Lands on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending and Biloxi Marsh Lands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%
Biloxi Marsh Lands-4,807.14%N/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Biloxi Marsh Lands has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Biloxi Marsh Lands pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 84.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and Biloxi Marsh Lands, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00703.00
Biloxi Marsh Lands0000N/A

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $18.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 17.12%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending and Biloxi Marsh Lands' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million5.89$128.28 million$1.9411.25
Biloxi Marsh Lands$20,000.00438.38$-3,030,000.00N/AN/A

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Biloxi Marsh Lands on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Biloxi Marsh Lands (OTCMKTS:BLMC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for New Mountain Finance and Biloxi Marsh Lands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance01202.67
Biloxi Marsh Lands0000N/A

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.45%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Biloxi Marsh Lands' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.41$112.56 million$1.279.91
Biloxi Marsh Lands$20,000.00438.38$-3,030,000.00N/AN/A

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Biloxi Marsh Lands.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and Biloxi Marsh Lands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
Biloxi Marsh Lands-4,807.14%N/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Biloxi Marsh Lands has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Biloxi Marsh Lands pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. New Mountain Finance pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Biloxi Marsh Lands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Biloxi Marsh Lands Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Ares Capital logo
ARCC
Ares Capital
1.3$18.52-1.3%$7.83 billion$1.53 billion24.69
Prospect Capital logo
PSEC
Prospect Capital
1.4$7.33-1.5%$2.87 billion$623.53 million20.94
Golub Capital BDC logo
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
1.4$14.95-2.7%$2.57 billion$298.95 million106.79News Coverage
FFXDF
Fairfax India
1.1$12.35-0.8%$1.85 billion$712.69 million212.60
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$21.83-1.0%$1.50 billion$251.49 million9.06
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.4$12.59-2.1%$1.25 billion$276.51 million-1,257.74
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.2$11.96-1.3%$469.89 million$95.49 million25.45Dividend Announcement
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$14.48-0.1%$447.01 million$73.39 million11.87Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$21.74-2.2%$441.27 million$62.04 million-54.35Increase in Short Interest
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.4$12.06-0.6%$402.78 million$61.92 million-22.33Analyst Upgrade
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.5$5.73-1.6%$390.20 million$100.22 million-23.88Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
TOBAF
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness
0.0$3.78-6.6%$347.86 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Oaktree Strategic Income logo
OCSI
Oaktree Strategic Income
1.3$8.34-1.1%$248.41 million$39.53 million-208.45
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.3$11.93-1.1%$235.00 million$58.91 million47.72News Coverage
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$7.72-2.1%$164.64 millionN/A-5.18News Coverage
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$3.96-1.0%$120.44 million$52.49 million-2.18Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
ELRNF
Elron Electronic Industries
0.5$3.90-3.8%$116.00 million$3.18 million-9.51Gap Down
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.3$8.23-2.4%$107.65 million$52.52 million-15.24Upcoming Earnings
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.07-0.0%$91.43 million$26.50 million-7.14Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Allied Minds logo
ALLWF
Allied Minds
0.4$0.36-0.0%$87.45 millionN/A0.00
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.3$5.76-3.0%$77.79 million$34.46 million-3.81High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.20-1.7%$75.92 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.4$16.50-1.6%$45.46 million$44.03 million-1.24Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.03-7.8%$44.80 million$1.79 million-0.78News Coverage
Gap Up
RAND
Rand Capital
1.5$16.40-3.7%$43.93 million$2.72 million9.42Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Cut
Gap Up
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$24.60-1.2%$38.72 million$191.70 million-20.85Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.34-24.6%$19.43 million$10,000.000.00Decrease in Short Interest
CBNT
C-Bond Systems
0.5$0.06-15.2%$16.52 million$600,000.00-1.56
MOLOF
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness
0.5$0.59-0.2%$5.34 million$680,000.00-1.84
MNTR
Mentor Capital
0.5$0.18-5.7%$4.03 million$4.33 million-4.38Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
CNVT
CVF Technologies
0.0$0.04-7.9%$1.90 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
AMPLQ
Ampal American Israel
0.6$0.00-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
AOVTF
Andover Mining
0.0$0.00-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 3/4/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.