OTCMKTS:CBNT

C-Bond Systems Competitors

$0.03
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/19/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.03
Now: $0.03
$0.04
50-Day Range
$0.03
MA: $0.06
$0.08
52-Week Range
$0.01
Now: $0.03
$0.25
Volume1.34 million shs
Average Volume1.64 million shs
Market Capitalization$7.89 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.43

Competitors

C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) Vs. ARCC, PSEC, GBDC, FFXDF, TSLX, and NMFC

Should you be buying CBNT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to C-Bond Systems, including Ares Capital (ARCC), Prospect Capital (PSEC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Fairfax India (FFXDF), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), and New Mountain Finance (NMFC).

C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

C-Bond Systems has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares C-Bond Systems and Ares Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
C-Bond Systems$600,000.0013.15$-7,240,000.00($0.08)-0.43
Ares Capital$1.53 billion5.56$793 million$1.8910.29

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than C-Bond Systems. C-Bond Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares C-Bond Systems and Ares Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
C-Bond Systems-743.46%N/A-1,106.03%
Ares Capital21.28%10.05%4.63%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for C-Bond Systems and Ares Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
C-Bond Systems0000N/A
Ares Capital02502.71

Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $17.75, suggesting a potential downside of 8.60%. Given Ares Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than C-Bond Systems.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.3% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 22.2% of C-Bond Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ares Capital beats C-Bond Systems on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) and Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

C-Bond Systems has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares C-Bond Systems and Prospect Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
C-Bond Systems$600,000.0013.15$-7,240,000.00($0.08)-0.43
Prospect Capital$623.53 million4.91$-16,220,000.00$0.7210.99

C-Bond Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Prospect Capital. C-Bond Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prospect Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares C-Bond Systems and Prospect Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
C-Bond Systems-743.46%N/A-1,106.03%
Prospect Capital22.08%8.16%4.72%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for C-Bond Systems and Prospect Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
C-Bond Systems0000N/A
Prospect Capital20001.00

Prospect Capital has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential downside of 42.89%. Given Prospect Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than C-Bond Systems.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 22.2% of C-Bond Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats C-Bond Systems on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) and Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for C-Bond Systems and Golub Capital BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
C-Bond Systems0000N/A
Golub Capital BDC02002.00

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential downside of 25.13%. Given Golub Capital BDC's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than C-Bond Systems.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 22.2% of C-Bond Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

C-Bond Systems has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares C-Bond Systems and Golub Capital BDC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
C-Bond Systems$600,000.0013.15$-7,240,000.00($0.08)-0.43
Golub Capital BDC$298.95 million8.59$54.87 million$1.2212.59

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than C-Bond Systems. C-Bond Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares C-Bond Systems and Golub Capital BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
C-Bond Systems-743.46%N/A-1,106.03%
Golub Capital BDC18.35%7.95%3.99%

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats C-Bond Systems on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fairfax India (OTCMKTS:FFXDF) and C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Fairfax India and C-Bond Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fairfax India00103.00
C-Bond Systems0000N/A

Given Fairfax India's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fairfax India is more favorable than C-Bond Systems.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Fairfax India shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.2% of C-Bond Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Fairfax India has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, C-Bond Systems has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fairfax India and C-Bond Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fairfax India$712.69 million2.65$516.34 millionN/AN/A
C-Bond Systems$600,000.0013.15$-7,240,000.00($0.08)-0.43

Fairfax India has higher revenue and earnings than C-Bond Systems.

Profitability

This table compares Fairfax India and C-Bond Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fairfax IndiaN/A-3.61%-2.85%
C-Bond Systems-743.46%N/A-1,106.03%

Summary

Fairfax India beats C-Bond Systems on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and C-Bond Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00703.00
C-Bond Systems0000N/A

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus price target of $19.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 13.58%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than C-Bond Systems.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.2% of C-Bond Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, C-Bond Systems has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending and C-Bond Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million6.39$128.28 million$1.9411.46
C-Bond Systems$600,000.0013.15$-7,240,000.00($0.08)-0.43

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than C-Bond Systems. C-Bond Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Sixth Street Specialty Lending and C-Bond Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%
C-Bond Systems-743.46%N/A-1,106.03%

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats C-Bond Systems on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and C-Bond Systems (OTCMKTS:CBNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares New Mountain Finance and C-Bond Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%
C-Bond Systems-743.46%N/A-1,106.03%

Risk & Volatility

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, C-Bond Systems has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for New Mountain Finance and C-Bond Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Mountain Finance02202.50
C-Bond Systems0000N/A

New Mountain Finance presently has a consensus price target of $11.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.10%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than C-Bond Systems.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.2% of C-Bond Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Mountain Finance and C-Bond Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.54$112.56 million$1.2710.20
C-Bond Systems$600,000.0013.15$-7,240,000.00($0.08)-0.43

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than C-Bond Systems. C-Bond Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Mountain Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats C-Bond Systems on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


C-Bond Systems Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Ares Capital logo
ARCC
Ares Capital
1.2$19.44flat$8.56 billion$1.53 billion25.92
Prospect Capital logo
PSEC
Prospect Capital
1.3$7.91flat$3.10 billion$623.53 million22.60News Coverage
Golub Capital BDC logo
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
1.4$15.36flat$2.58 billion$298.95 million109.72Decrease in Short Interest
FFXDF
Fairfax India
1.1$12.64flat$1.89 billion$712.69 million212.60Gap Up
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$22.23flat$1.61 billion$251.49 million9.22
New Mountain Finance logo
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.1$12.96flat$1.26 billion$276.51 million-1,294.71Decrease in Short Interest
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.63flat$490.44 million$95.49 million26.87Decrease in Short Interest
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.44flat$481.76 million$73.39 million12.66Decrease in Short Interest
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$14.14flat$468.19 million$61.92 million-26.19Dividend Announcement
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.38flat$467.49 million$62.04 million-58.45
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.49flat$441.16 million$100.22 million-27.04
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.56flat$265.98 million$58.91 million54.24
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness logo
TOBAF
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness
0.0$2.66flat$246.85 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Gap Down
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.38flat$177.46 million$26.50 million-8.21
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.18flat$131.53 millionN/A-4.15Gap Up
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.22flat$129.17 million$52.49 million-2.32
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$8.81flat$119.74 million$52.52 million-16.31
ELRNF
Elron Electronic Industries
0.5$3.90flat$114.50 million$3.18 million-9.51Decrease in Short Interest
Allied Minds logo
ALLWF
Allied Minds
0.4$0.39flat$93.00 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.69flat$78.90 million$34.46 million-3.77News Coverage
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.28flat$74.90 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.36flat$48.28 million$2.72 million10.55Gap Up
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.61flat$43.82 million$191.70 million-25.09Gap Down
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.29flat$43.36 million$1.79 million-0.81
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$15.50flat$41.91 million$44.03 million-1.16
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.20flat$14.20 million$10,000.000.00Gap Up
Biloxi Marsh Lands logo
BLMC
Biloxi Marsh Lands
0.6$3.25flat$8.14 million$20,000.00-12.04Gap Down
MOLOF
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness
0.5$0.59flat$5.34 million$680,000.00-1.84News Coverage
Mentor Capital logo
MNTR
Mentor Capital
0.5$0.15flat$3.43 million$4.33 million-3.75
CNVT
CVF Technologies
0.0$0.05flat$1.84 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
AMPLQ
Ampal American Israel
0.6$0.00flat$0.00N/A0.00
AOVTF
Andover Mining
0.0$0.01flat$0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 4/20/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.