OTCMKTS:CHAPQ

Chaparral Energy Competitors

$0.04

-0.01 (-12.50 %)

(As of 10/14/2020)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$0.03

Now: $0.04▼

$0.04

50-Day Range

$0.04

MA: $0.03▼

$0.04

52-Week Range

$0.03

Now: $0.04▼

$1.98

Volume153,300 shs

Average Volume2.11 million shs

Market Capitalization$1.67 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1.98

Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) Vs. SDTTU, SDRMU, BDCO, CRBO, CRBOD, and ROYTL

Should you be buying CHAPQ stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Chaparral Energy, including SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (SDTTU), SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (SDRMU), Blue Dolphin Energy (BDCO), Carbon Energy (CRBO), Carbon Energy (CRBOD), and Pacific Coast Oil Trust (ROYTL).

Chaparral Energy vs. SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Stock

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (OTCMKTS:SDTTU) and Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SandRidge Mississippian Trust I and Chaparral Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SandRidge Mississippian Trust I	$6.39 million	1.01	$3.43 million	N/A	N/A
Chaparral Energy	$236.35 million	0.01	$-468,950,000.00	$0.45	0.08

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chaparral Energy.

Risk and Volatility

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chaparral Energy has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for SandRidge Mississippian Trust I and Chaparral Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SandRidge Mississippian Trust I	0	0	0	0	N/A
Chaparral Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares SandRidge Mississippian Trust I and Chaparral Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SandRidge Mississippian Trust I	30.43%	9.71%	9.71%
Chaparral Energy	-411.22%	-115.71%	-44.61%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

47.8% of Chaparral Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I beats Chaparral Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chaparral Energy vs. SandRidge Mississippian Trust II Stock

Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (OTCMKTS:SDRMU) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

47.8% of Chaparral Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Chaparral Energy and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chaparral Energy	-411.22%	-115.71%	-44.61%
SandRidge Mississippian Trust II	46.24%	23.94%	23.94%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Chaparral Energy and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chaparral Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
SandRidge Mississippian Trust II	0	0	0	0	N/A

Risk & Volatility

Chaparral Energy has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SandRidge Mississippian Trust II has a beta of 1.7, indicating that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Chaparral Energy and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chaparral Energy	$236.35 million	0.01	$-468,950,000.00	$0.45	0.08
SandRidge Mississippian Trust II	$10.15 million	0.63	$5.88 million	N/A	N/A

SandRidge Mississippian Trust II has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chaparral Energy.

Summary

SandRidge Mississippian Trust II beats Chaparral Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chaparral Energy vs. Blue Dolphin Energy Stock

Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) and Blue Dolphin Energy (OTCMKTS:BDCO) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Chaparral Energy has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Blue Dolphin Energy has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

47.8% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 84.2% of Blue Dolphin Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Chaparral Energy and Blue Dolphin Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chaparral Energy	-411.22%	-115.71%	-44.61%
Blue Dolphin Energy	-5.07%	8,476.37%	-15.07%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Chaparral Energy and Blue Dolphin Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chaparral Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
Blue Dolphin Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Chaparral Energy and Blue Dolphin Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chaparral Energy	$236.35 million	0.01	$-468,950,000.00	$0.45	0.08
Blue Dolphin Energy	$309.26 million	0.02	$7.36 million	N/A	N/A

Blue Dolphin Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Chaparral Energy.

Summary

Blue Dolphin Energy beats Chaparral Energy on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chaparral Energy vs. Carbon Energy Stock

Carbon Energy (OTCMKTS:CRBO) and Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.6% of Carbon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Carbon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Carbon Energy and Chaparral Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carbon Energy	$116.63 million	0.05	$1.10 million	N/A	N/A
Chaparral Energy	$236.35 million	0.01	$-468,950,000.00	$0.45	0.08

Carbon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chaparral Energy.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Carbon Energy and Chaparral Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carbon Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
Chaparral Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Risk and Volatility

Carbon Energy has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chaparral Energy has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Carbon Energy and Chaparral Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carbon Energy	-38.38%	-8.44%	-2.43%
Chaparral Energy	-411.22%	-115.71%	-44.61%

Summary

Carbon Energy beats Chaparral Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chaparral Energy vs. Carbon Energy Stock

Carbon Energy (OTCMKTS:CRBOD) and Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

10.5% of Carbon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Carbon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Carbon Energy and Chaparral Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carbon Energy	$116.63 million	0.03	$1.10 million	N/A	N/A
Chaparral Energy	$236.35 million	0.01	$-468,950,000.00	$0.45	0.08

Carbon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chaparral Energy.

Risk and Volatility

Profitability

This table compares Carbon Energy and Chaparral Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carbon Energy	-38.38%	-8.44%	-2.43%
Chaparral Energy	-411.22%	-115.71%	-44.61%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Carbon Energy and Chaparral Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carbon Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
Chaparral Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Carbon Energy beats Chaparral Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chaparral Energy vs. Pacific Coast Oil Trust Stock

Chaparral Energy (OTCMKTS:CHAPQ) and Pacific Coast Oil Trust (OTCMKTS:ROYTL) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Chaparral Energy and Pacific Coast Oil Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chaparral Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
Pacific Coast Oil Trust	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Chaparral Energy and Pacific Coast Oil Trust's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chaparral Energy	$236.35 million	0.01	$-468,950,000.00	$0.45	0.08
Pacific Coast Oil Trust	$54.18 million	0.10	$12.62 million	N/A	N/A

Pacific Coast Oil Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chaparral Energy.

Volatility & Risk

Chaparral Energy has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Coast Oil Trust has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Chaparral Energy and Pacific Coast Oil Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chaparral Energy	-411.22%	-115.71%	-44.61%
Pacific Coast Oil Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

47.8% of Chaparral Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pacific Coast Oil Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Chaparral Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pacific Coast Oil Trust beats Chaparral Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.