OTCMKTS:CHKAQ

Chesapeake Energy Competitors

$3.05

0.00 (0.00 %)

(As of 04/20/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$3.05

Now: $3.05▼

$3.05

50-Day Range

$3.05

MA: $3.05▼

$3.05

52-Week Range

$1.49

Now: $3.05▼

$106.40

VolumeN/A

Average Volume653,465 shs

Market Capitalization$29.83 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1.25

Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) Vs. EOG, PXD, DVN, FANG, CLR, and MRO

Should you be buying CHKAQ stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas exploration & production" are considered alternatives and competitors to Chesapeake Energy, including EOG Resources (EOG), Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD), Devon Energy (DVN), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Continental Resources (CLR), and Marathon Oil (MRO).

Chesapeake Energy vs. EOG Resources Stock

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares EOG Resources and Chesapeake Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EOG Resources	-2.47%	5.86%	3.38%
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for EOG Resources and Chesapeake Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EOG Resources	0	12	13	0	2.52
Chesapeake Energy	1	0	0	0	1.00

EOG Resources currently has a consensus target price of $72.16, indicating a potential upside of 5.24%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Chesapeake Energy.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares EOG Resources and Chesapeake Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EOG Resources	$17.38 billion	2.30	$2.73 billion	$4.98	13.77
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Energy. Chesapeake Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

EOG Resources has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.7% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

EOG Resources beats Chesapeake Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chesapeake Energy vs. Pioneer Natural Resources Stock

Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) and Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pioneer Natural Resources and Chesapeake Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pioneer Natural Resources	$9.30 billion	3.40	$756 million	$8.18	17.84
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06

Pioneer Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Chesapeake Energy. Chesapeake Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pioneer Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Pioneer Natural Resources and Chesapeake Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pioneer Natural Resources	2.30%	4.67%	2.97%
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Pioneer Natural Resources and Chesapeake Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pioneer Natural Resources	0	5	22	1	2.86
Chesapeake Energy	1	0	0	0	1.00

Pioneer Natural Resources currently has a consensus target price of $172.2593, indicating a potential upside of 18.05%. Given Pioneer Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Pioneer Natural Resources is more favorable than Chesapeake Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats Chesapeake Energy on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chesapeake Energy vs. Devon Energy Stock

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Devon Energy has a beta of 3.46, meaning that its share price is 246% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Devon Energy and Chesapeake Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy	$6.22 billion	2.27	$-355,000,000.00	$1.38	15.20
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06

Chesapeake Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Chesapeake Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Devon Energy and Chesapeake Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Devon Energy	-62.68%	2.38%	0.86%
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Devon Energy and Chesapeake Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Devon Energy	0	2	19	0	2.90
Chesapeake Energy	1	0	0	0	1.00

Devon Energy currently has a consensus price target of $23.4886, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Chesapeake Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.9% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Devon Energy beats Chesapeake Energy on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chesapeake Energy vs. Diamondback Energy Stock

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Diamondback Energy and Chesapeake Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy	-135.48%	5.10%	3.06%
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Diamondback Energy and Chesapeake Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Diamondback Energy	0	4	24	0	2.86
Chesapeake Energy	1	0	0	0	1.00

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $79.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.37%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Chesapeake Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, meaning that its share price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Diamondback Energy and Chesapeake Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy	$3.96 billion	2.96	$240 million	$6.93	10.72
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06

Diamondback Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chesapeake Energy. Chesapeake Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Chesapeake Energy on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chesapeake Energy vs. Continental Resources Stock

Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) and Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Chesapeake Energy and Continental Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Chesapeake Energy and Continental Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chesapeake Energy	1	0	0	0	1.00
Continental Resources	2	16	3	0	2.05

Continental Resources has a consensus price target of $21.0526, indicating a potential downside of 17.57%. Given Continental Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Continental Resources is more favorable than Chesapeake Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its stock price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Chesapeake Energy and Continental Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	2.03	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.35

Continental Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chesapeake Energy. Chesapeake Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Continental Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Continental Resources beats Chesapeake Energy on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chesapeake Energy vs. Marathon Oil Stock

Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) and Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Chesapeake Energy and Marathon Oil's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06
Marathon Oil	$5.19 billion	1.54	$480 million	$0.75	13.48

Marathon Oil has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chesapeake Energy. Chesapeake Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Chesapeake Energy and Marathon Oil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%
Marathon Oil	-32.64%	-6.64%	-3.97%

Risk & Volatility

Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marathon Oil has a beta of 3.36, meaning that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Chesapeake Energy and Marathon Oil, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chesapeake Energy	1	0	0	0	1.00
Marathon Oil	3	10	8	0	2.24

Marathon Oil has a consensus price target of $8.6706, indicating a potential downside of 14.24%. Given Marathon Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Oil is more favorable than Chesapeake Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Marathon Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Marathon Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marathon Oil beats Chesapeake Energy on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.