OTCMKTS:CNVT

CVF Technologies Competitors

$0.05
+0.00 (+2.27 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 08:09 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.05
Now: $0.05
$0.08
50-Day Range
$0.04
MA: $0.04
$0.06
52-Week Range
$0.01
Now: $0.05
$0.08
Volume11,200 shs
Average Volume35,739 shs
Market Capitalization$1.84 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta-0.12

Competitors

CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) Vs. ARCC, PSEC, GBDC, FFXDF, TSLX, and NMFC

Should you be buying CNVT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to CVF Technologies, including Ares Capital (ARCC), Prospect Capital (PSEC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Fairfax India (FFXDF), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), and New Mountain Finance (NMFC).

CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CVF Technologies and Ares Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CVF Technologies0000N/A
Ares Capital02502.71

Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $17.75, suggesting a potential downside of 9.53%. Given Ares Capital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than CVF Technologies.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CVF Technologies and Ares Capital's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Ares Capital$1.53 billion5.62$793 million$1.8910.38

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than CVF Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares CVF Technologies and Ares Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
Ares Capital21.28%10.05%4.63%

Volatility and Risk

CVF Technologies has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its share price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.3% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 17.4% of CVF Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ares Capital beats CVF Technologies on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) and CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of CVF Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Prospect Capital and CVF Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Prospect Capital$623.53 million5.00$-16,220,000.00$0.7211.18
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

CVF Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Prospect Capital.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Prospect Capital and CVF Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Prospect Capital20001.00
CVF Technologies0000N/A

Prospect Capital currently has a consensus target price of $4.50, suggesting a potential downside of 44.10%. Given Prospect Capital's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than CVF Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Prospect Capital and CVF Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Prospect Capital22.08%8.16%4.72%
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVF Technologies has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats CVF Technologies on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of CVF Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and CVF Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golub Capital BDC$298.95 million8.60$54.87 million$1.2212.61
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than CVF Technologies.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Golub Capital BDC and CVF Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Golub Capital BDC02002.00
CVF Technologies0000N/A

Golub Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential downside of 25.23%. Given Golub Capital BDC's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than CVF Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and CVF Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Golub Capital BDC18.35%7.95%3.99%
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVF Technologies has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats CVF Technologies on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fairfax India (OTCMKTS:FFXDF) and CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Fairfax India and CVF Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fairfax India00103.00
CVF Technologies0000N/A

Given Fairfax India's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fairfax India is more favorable than CVF Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Fairfax India and CVF Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fairfax IndiaN/A-3.61%-2.85%
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Fairfax India shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.4% of CVF Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Fairfax India has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CVF Technologies has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its stock price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fairfax India and CVF Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fairfax India$712.69 million2.74$516.34 millionN/AN/A
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Fairfax India has higher revenue and earnings than CVF Technologies.

Summary

Fairfax India beats CVF Technologies on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for CVF Technologies and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CVF Technologies0000N/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending00703.00

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 14.46%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than CVF Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares CVF Technologies and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending59.17%13.52%6.95%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.4% of CVF Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

CVF Technologies has a beta of -0.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CVF Technologies and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$251.49 million6.43$128.28 million$1.9411.54

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than CVF Technologies.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats CVF Technologies on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

CVF Technologies (OTCMKTS:CNVT) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for CVF Technologies and New Mountain Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CVF Technologies0000N/A
New Mountain Finance02202.50

New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $11.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than CVF Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares CVF Technologies and New Mountain Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/A
New Mountain Finance4.94%10.30%3.93%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.4% of CVF Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

CVF Technologies has a beta of -0.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CVF Technologies and New Mountain Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CVF TechnologiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
New Mountain Finance$276.51 million4.55$112.56 million$1.2710.23

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than CVF Technologies.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats CVF Technologies on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


CVF Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Ares Capital logo
ARCC
Ares Capital
1.2$19.62+0.7%$8.57 billion$1.53 billion26.16
Prospect Capital logo
PSEC
Prospect Capital
1.3$8.05+0.6%$3.12 billion$623.53 million23.00
Golub Capital BDC logo
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
1.4$15.38+0.1%$2.57 billion$298.95 million109.86Decrease in Short Interest
FFXDF
Fairfax India
1.1$13.05+0.4%$1.95 billion$712.69 million212.60
Sixth Street Specialty Lending logo
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1.7$22.38+0.9%$1.52 billion$251.49 million9.29
New Mountain Finance logo
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
1.1$12.99+0.5%$1.26 billion$276.51 million-1,297.70Decrease in Short Interest
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.67+0.2%$491.22 million$95.49 million26.96Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.71+0.4%$485.16 million$73.39 million12.88Decrease in Short Interest
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$14.07+1.9%$467.19 million$61.92 million-26.06Dividend Announcement
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.39+0.0%$464.71 million$62.04 million-58.48
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.58+0.9%$441.16 million$100.22 million-27.42
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.60+0.1%$265.01 million$58.91 million54.40
Oaktree Strategic Income logo
OCSI
Oaktree Strategic Income
1.3$8.50+1.5%$250.47 million$39.53 million-212.45
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness logo
TOBAF
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness
0.0$2.48+4.4%$230.43 millionN/A0.00
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.39+1.3%$179.72 million$26.50 million-8.24
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.41+3.7%$134.25 millionN/A-4.30
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.27+0.0%$128.57 million$52.49 million-2.35
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$9.10+0.4%$122.02 million$52.52 million-16.85
ELRNF
Elron Electronic Industries
0.5$3.85+0.6%$114.50 million$3.18 million-9.39Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Allied Minds logo
ALLWF
Allied Minds
0.4$0.35+3.4%$84.55 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.70+0.4%$79.32 million$34.46 million-3.77
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.30+0.0%$75.73 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.24+0.7%$47.10 million$2.72 million10.48Gap Down
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.65+1.9%$46.11 million$191.70 million-25.13
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.28+1.0%$43.29 million$1.79 million-0.81
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$15.52+0.6%$42.08 million$44.03 million-1.16News Coverage
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.22+6.6%$14.20 million$10,000.000.00Gap Up
CBNT
C-Bond Systems
0.5$0.04+22.6%$8.93 million$600,000.00-0.96High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Biloxi Marsh Lands logo
BLMC
Biloxi Marsh Lands
0.6$3.25+9.2%$8.14 million$20,000.00-12.04High Trading Volume
Gap Up
MOLOF
TAAT Lifestyle & Wellness
0.5$0.59+0.2%$5.34 million$680,000.00-1.84
Mentor Capital logo
MNTR
Mentor Capital
0.5$0.17+5.9%$3.86 million$4.33 million-4.23Gap Down
AMPLQ
Ampal American Israel
0.6$0.00+20.0%$0.00N/A0.00Gap Down
AOVTF
Andover Mining
0.0$0.01+7.7%$0.00N/A0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/19/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.