Energy & Technology Competitors

CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) and Energy & Technology (OTCMKTS:ENGT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, suggesting that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy & Technology has a beta of 2.98, suggesting that its stock price is 198% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CSI Compressco and Energy & Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Energy & Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CSI Compressco.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares CSI Compressco and Energy & Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for CSI Compressco and Energy & Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Energy & Technology beats CSI Compressco on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Energy & Technology (OTCMKTS:ENGT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy & Technology has a beta of 2.98, suggesting that its share price is 198% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and Energy & Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Energy & Technology.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and Energy & Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ranger Energy Services and Energy & Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 36.12%. Given Ranger Energy Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Energy & Technology.

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Energy & Technology on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLX Energy Services (NASDAQ:KLXE) and Energy & Technology (OTCMKTS:ENGT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

KLX Energy Services has a beta of 3.71, suggesting that its share price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy & Technology has a beta of 2.98, suggesting that its share price is 198% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares KLX Energy Services and Energy & Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Energy & Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than KLX Energy Services.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.8% of KLX Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 10.7% of KLX Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares KLX Energy Services and Energy & Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for KLX Energy Services and Energy & Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

KLX Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 118.39%. Given KLX Energy Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KLX Energy Services is more favorable than Energy & Technology.

Summary

KLX Energy Services beats Energy & Technology on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Key Energy Services (OTCMKTS:KEGX) and Energy & Technology (OTCMKTS:ENGT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Key Energy Services and Energy & Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Key Energy Services has a beta of 2.54, suggesting that its stock price is 154% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy & Technology has a beta of 2.98, suggesting that its stock price is 198% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Key Energy Services and Energy & Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Key Energy Services and Energy & Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Energy & Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Key Energy Services.

Summary

Energy & Technology beats Key Energy Services on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energy & Technology (OTCMKTS:ENGT) and Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Energy & Technology and Hurricane Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Energy & Technology has a beta of 2.98, suggesting that its stock price is 198% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Energy & Technology and Hurricane Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Energy & Technology and Hurricane Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hurricane Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Energy & Technology.

Energy & Technology (OTCMKTS:ENGT) and Superior Energy Services (OTCMKTS:SPNVD) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Energy & Technology has a beta of 2.98, meaning that its stock price is 198% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superior Energy Services has a beta of 2.75, meaning that its stock price is 175% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Energy & Technology and Superior Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

8.8% of Superior Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of Superior Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Energy & Technology and Superior Energy Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Energy & Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Superior Energy Services.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Energy & Technology and Superior Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Energy & Technology beats Superior Energy Services on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.