OTCMKTS:ETFM

FOMO Competitors

$0.0070
0.00 (-5.41 %)
(As of 05/5/2021 03:59 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.01
$0.01
50-Day Range
$0.01
$0.01
52-Week Range
$0.00
$0.03
Volume27.94 million shs
Average Volume205.27 million shs
Market Capitalization$39.13 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta7.4

Competitors

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) Vs. EL, CL, NTCO, COTY, IPAR, and EPC

Should you be buying ETFM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "toilet preparations" are considered alternatives and competitors to FOMO, including The Estée Lauder Companies (EL), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Natura &Co (NTCO), Coty (COTY), Inter Parfums (IPAR), and Edgewell Personal Care (EPC).

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) and The Estée Lauder Companies (NYSE:EL) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

55.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of FOMO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FOMO and The Estée Lauder Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FOMON/A-6.23%-148.02%
The Estée Lauder Companies4.38%32.72%7.91%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for FOMO and The Estée Lauder Companies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FOMO0000N/A
The Estée Lauder Companies031602.84

The Estée Lauder Companies has a consensus target price of $301.7619, suggesting a potential upside of 2.57%. Given The Estée Lauder Companies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Estée Lauder Companies is more favorable than FOMO.

Risk & Volatility

FOMO has a beta of 7.4, indicating that its stock price is 640% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Estée Lauder Companies has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FOMO and The Estée Lauder Companies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FOMON/AN/A$-70,000.00N/AN/A
The Estée Lauder Companies$14.29 billion7.47$684 million$4.1271.41

The Estée Lauder Companies has higher revenue and earnings than FOMO.

Summary

The Estée Lauder Companies beats FOMO on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) and Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.5% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of FOMO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Colgate-Palmolive shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FOMO and Colgate-Palmolive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FOMON/A-6.23%-148.02%
Colgate-Palmolive16.65%383.88%17.10%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for FOMO and Colgate-Palmolive, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FOMO0000N/A
Colgate-Palmolive27202.00

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus target price of $82.75, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Colgate-Palmolive's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Colgate-Palmolive is more favorable than FOMO.

Risk & Volatility

FOMO has a beta of 7.4, indicating that its stock price is 640% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FOMO and Colgate-Palmolive's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FOMON/AN/A$-70,000.00N/AN/A
Colgate-Palmolive$15.69 billion4.38$2.37 billion$2.8328.73

Colgate-Palmolive has higher revenue and earnings than FOMO.

Summary

Colgate-Palmolive beats FOMO on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) and Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.8% of Natura &Co shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of FOMO shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FOMO and Natura &Co's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FOMON/A-6.23%-148.02%
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for FOMO and Natura &Co, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FOMO0000N/A
Natura &Co0000N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FOMO and Natura &Co's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FOMON/AN/A$-70,000.00N/AN/A
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.38$39.40 million$0.09200.00

Natura &Co has higher revenue and earnings than FOMO.

Summary

Natura &Co beats FOMO on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) and Coty (NYSE:COTY) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

22.7% of Coty shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of FOMO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Coty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FOMO and Coty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FOMON/A-6.23%-148.02%
Coty-15.56%-3.35%-0.72%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for FOMO and Coty, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FOMO0000N/A
Coty17422.50

Coty has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.44%. Given Coty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Coty is more favorable than FOMO.

Risk & Volatility

FOMO has a beta of 7.4, indicating that its stock price is 640% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coty has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FOMO and Coty's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FOMON/AN/A$-70,000.00N/AN/A
Coty$4.72 billion1.60$-1,006,700,000.00($0.48)-20.48

FOMO has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Coty.

Summary

Coty beats FOMO on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) and Inter Parfums (NASDAQ:IPAR) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.1% of Inter Parfums shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of FOMO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.7% of Inter Parfums shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FOMO and Inter Parfums' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FOMON/A-6.23%-148.02%
Inter Parfums5.94%5.12%3.98%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for FOMO and Inter Parfums, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FOMO0000N/A
Inter Parfums05102.17

Inter Parfums has a consensus target price of $65.40, suggesting a potential downside of 11.87%. Given Inter Parfums' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Inter Parfums is more favorable than FOMO.

Risk & Volatility

FOMO has a beta of 7.4, indicating that its stock price is 640% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Inter Parfums has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FOMO and Inter Parfums' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FOMON/AN/A$-70,000.00N/AN/A
Inter Parfums$713.51 million3.29$60.25 million$1.9039.06

Inter Parfums has higher revenue and earnings than FOMO.

Summary

Inter Parfums beats FOMO on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

FOMO (OTCMKTS:ETFM) and Edgewell Personal Care (NYSE:EPC) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

FOMO has a beta of 7.4, indicating that its stock price is 640% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

92.3% of Edgewell Personal Care shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of FOMO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Edgewell Personal Care shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FOMO and Edgewell Personal Care's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FOMON/A-6.23%-148.02%
Edgewell Personal Care3.47%10.83%4.37%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for FOMO and Edgewell Personal Care, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FOMO0000N/A
Edgewell Personal Care13102.00

Edgewell Personal Care has a consensus target price of $35.40, suggesting a potential downside of 11.37%. Given Edgewell Personal Care's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Edgewell Personal Care is more favorable than FOMO.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FOMO and Edgewell Personal Care's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FOMON/AN/A$-70,000.00N/AN/A
Edgewell Personal Care$1.95 billion1.11$67.60 million$2.7314.63

Edgewell Personal Care has higher revenue and earnings than FOMO.

Summary

Edgewell Personal Care beats FOMO on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


FOMO Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The Estée Lauder Companies logo
EL
The Estée Lauder Companies
2.1$294.21-2.7%$109.59 billion$14.29 billion179.40Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Colgate-Palmolive logo
CL
Colgate-Palmolive
2.0$81.32-0.3%$68.73 billion$15.69 billion25.98Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Natura &Co logo
NTCO
Natura &Co
0.6$18.00-1.4%$12.21 billion$3.66 billion200.00Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.4$9.83-1.8%$7.68 billion$4.72 billion-8.47Upcoming Earnings
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.6$74.21-0.2%$2.35 billion$713.51 million74.21Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
1.7$39.94-0.8%$2.15 billion$1.95 billion32.21Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
e.l.f. Beauty logo
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty
1.5$29.93-0.7%$1.52 billion$282.85 million157.53Insider Selling
Mandom logo
MDOMF
Mandom
0.5$24.55-0.0%$1.19 billion$752.29 million27.28
Revlon logo
REV
Revlon
0.9$11.21-2.9%$572.29 million$2.42 billion-1.67Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
UG
United-Guardian
1.0$14.96-0.1%$68.70 million$13.60 million16.62Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
CCA Industries logo
CAWW
CCA Industries
1.0$2.45-0.0%$18.28 million$17.14 million-122.50
DS Healthcare Group logo
DSKX
DS Healthcare Group
0.5$0.00-0.0%$60,000.00N/A0.00
ASCBQ
Ascendia Brands
0.2$0.00-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
NXRA
Nextera Enterprises
0.0$0.00-9.1%$0.00N/A0.00Gap Up
This page was last updated on 5/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.