S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
Log in
OTCMKTS:FMCC

Freddie Mac Competitors

$2.49
+0.12 (+5.06 %)
(As of 11/25/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.36
Now: $2.49
$2.52
50-Day Range
$1.70
MA: $1.88
$2.42
52-Week Range
$1.20
Now: $2.49
$3.39
Volume2.99 million shs
Average Volume2.10 million shs
Market Capitalization$1.62 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.37

Competitors

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) Vs. EWBC, SBHGF, CUBE, RAIFY, SBNY, and AVAL

Should you be buying FMCC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "finance" are considered alternatives and competitors to Freddie Mac, including East West Bancorp (EWBC), SBI (SBHGF), CubeSmart (CUBE), Raiffeisen Bank International (RAIFY), Signature Bank (SBNY), and Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (AVAL).

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) and East West Bancorp (NASDAQ:EWBC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Freddie Mac has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, East West Bancorp has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Freddie Mac and East West Bancorp's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freddie Mac$75.13 billion0.02$7.21 billion($0.18)-13.83
East West Bancorp$2.09 billion3.08$674.03 million$4.849.41

Freddie Mac has higher revenue and earnings than East West Bancorp. Freddie Mac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than East West Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Freddie Mac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of East West Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Freddie Mac shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of East West Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Freddie Mac and East West Bancorp, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Freddie Mac11402.50
East West Bancorp06202.25

Freddie Mac presently has a consensus target price of $3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 50.60%. East West Bancorp has a consensus target price of $68.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.25%. Given Freddie Mac's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Freddie Mac is more favorable than East West Bancorp.

Profitability

This table compares Freddie Mac and East West Bancorp's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Freddie Mac9.98%-9.25%0.30%
East West Bancorp31.05%11.80%1.24%

Summary

East West Bancorp beats Freddie Mac on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) and SBI (OTCMKTS:SBHGF) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Freddie Mac has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SBI has a beta of 3.17, indicating that its share price is 217% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Freddie Mac and SBI's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freddie Mac$75.13 billion0.02$7.21 billion($0.18)-13.83
SBI$3.39 billion1.89$344.88 million$1.3620.38

Freddie Mac has higher revenue and earnings than SBI. Freddie Mac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SBI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Freddie Mac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of SBI shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Freddie Mac shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Freddie Mac and SBI, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Freddie Mac11402.50
SBI00103.00

Freddie Mac presently has a consensus price target of $3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 50.60%. Given Freddie Mac's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freddie Mac is more favorable than SBI.

Profitability

This table compares Freddie Mac and SBI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Freddie Mac9.98%-9.25%0.30%
SBIN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Freddie Mac beats SBI on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) and CubeSmart (NYSE:CUBE) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Freddie Mac has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CubeSmart has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Freddie Mac and CubeSmart's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freddie Mac$75.13 billion0.02$7.21 billion($0.18)-13.83
CubeSmart$643.91 million9.91$169.12 million$1.6919.34

Freddie Mac has higher revenue and earnings than CubeSmart. Freddie Mac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CubeSmart, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Freddie Mac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.5% of CubeSmart shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Freddie Mac shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of CubeSmart shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Freddie Mac and CubeSmart, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Freddie Mac11402.50
CubeSmart25302.10

Freddie Mac presently has a consensus price target of $3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 50.60%. CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $32.20, suggesting a potential downside of 1.50%. Given Freddie Mac's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freddie Mac is more favorable than CubeSmart.

Profitability

This table compares Freddie Mac and CubeSmart's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Freddie Mac9.98%-9.25%0.30%
CubeSmart24.83%9.30%4.11%

Summary

CubeSmart beats Freddie Mac on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) and Raiffeisen Bank International (OTCMKTS:RAIFY) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Freddie Mac has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Raiffeisen Bank International has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Freddie Mac and Raiffeisen Bank International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freddie Mac$75.13 billion0.02$7.21 billion($0.18)-13.83
Raiffeisen Bank International$5.85 billion1.07$1.37 billionN/AN/A

Freddie Mac has higher revenue and earnings than Raiffeisen Bank International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Freddie Mac shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Freddie Mac shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Freddie Mac and Raiffeisen Bank International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Freddie Mac11402.50
Raiffeisen Bank International13202.17

Freddie Mac presently has a consensus price target of $3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 50.60%. Given Freddie Mac's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freddie Mac is more favorable than Raiffeisen Bank International.

Profitability

This table compares Freddie Mac and Raiffeisen Bank International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Freddie Mac9.98%-9.25%0.30%
Raiffeisen Bank International11.69%7.79%0.68%

Summary

Freddie Mac beats Raiffeisen Bank International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) and Signature Bank (NASDAQ:SBNY) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Freddie Mac has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Signature Bank has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Freddie Mac and Signature Bank's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freddie Mac$75.13 billion0.02$7.21 billion($0.18)-13.83
Signature Bank$1.94 billion3.18$588.93 million$10.8610.62

Freddie Mac has higher revenue and earnings than Signature Bank. Freddie Mac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Signature Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Freddie Mac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Signature Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Freddie Mac shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Freddie Mac and Signature Bank, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Freddie Mac11402.50
Signature Bank031112.87

Freddie Mac presently has a consensus price target of $3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 50.60%. Signature Bank has a consensus price target of $122.40, suggesting a potential upside of 6.18%. Given Freddie Mac's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freddie Mac is more favorable than Signature Bank.

Profitability

This table compares Freddie Mac and Signature Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Freddie Mac9.98%-9.25%0.30%
Signature Bank26.12%10.74%0.96%

Summary

Signature Bank beats Freddie Mac on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Freddie Mac (OTCMKTS:FMCC) and Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (NYSE:AVAL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Freddie Mac has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Freddie Mac and Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Freddie Mac9.98%-9.25%0.30%
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores9.67%7.45%0.84%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Freddie Mac and Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freddie Mac$75.13 billion0.02$7.21 billion($0.18)-13.83
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores$8.44 billion0.73$910.32 million$0.826.71

Freddie Mac has higher revenue and earnings than Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores. Freddie Mac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Freddie Mac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Freddie Mac shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Freddie Mac and Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Freddie Mac11402.50
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores01002.00

Freddie Mac presently has a consensus price target of $3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 50.60%. Given Freddie Mac's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freddie Mac is more favorable than Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores.

Summary

Freddie Mac beats Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Freddie Mac Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
East West Bancorp logo
EWBC
East West Bancorp
2.6$45.56+2.0%$6.45 billion$2.09 billion11.09Analyst Upgrade
SBI logo
SBHGF
SBI
0.9$27.72+3.0%$6.39 billion$3.39 billion20.38Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
CubeSmart logo
CUBE
CubeSmart
1.5$32.69+1.9%$6.38 billion$643.91 million38.01
RAIFY
Raiffeisen Bank International
0.8$4.78+0.0%$6.29 billion$5.85 billion4.86Analyst Downgrade
Signature Bank logo
SBNY
Signature Bank
2.8$115.28+1.0%$6.17 billion$1.94 billion12.15
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores logo
AVAL
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores
1.8$5.50+1.8%$6.13 billion$8.44 billion8.46Analyst Downgrade
Heavy News Reporting
Jefferies Financial Group logo
JEF
Jefferies Financial Group
1.9$23.74+0.3%$6.06 billion$3.89 billion10.69
British Land logo
BTLCY
British Land
0.9$6.50+0.2%$6.02 billion$785.11 million0.00
The Bank of East Asia logo
BKEAY
The Bank of East Asia
1.6$2.06+0.0%$6.01 billion$4.13 billion18.74
Rexford Industrial Realty logo
REXR
Rexford Industrial Realty
1.7$48.55+0.0%$6.01 billion$267.21 million83.71
Prosperity Bancshares logo
PB
Prosperity Bancshares
2.0$64.57+1.0%$5.98 billion$957.22 million12.91
Healthcare Trust of America logo
HTA
Healthcare Trust of America
2.0$26.69+0.1%$5.83 billion$692.04 million177.93
FirstService logo
FSV
FirstService
1.5$132.06+0.6%$5.74 billion$2.41 billion80.04
Old Republic International logo
ORI
Old Republic International
2.2$18.69+1.3%$5.68 billion$7.21 billion20.54Dividend Announcement
Heavy News Reporting
Douglas Emmett logo
DEI
Douglas Emmett
2.4$32.37+2.9%$5.68 billion$936.68 million18.39
American Campus Communities logo
ACC
American Campus Communities
1.9$41.04+0.2%$5.65 billion$943.04 million80.47Analyst Upgrade
People's United Financial logo
PBCT
People's United Financial
2.2$13.21+2.3%$5.61 billion$2.31 billion11.49
Western Alliance Bancorporation logo
WAL
Western Alliance Bancorporation
2.3$55.18+1.7%$5.56 billion$1.29 billion12.98
OneMain logo
OMF
OneMain
2.7$41.24+1.2%$5.54 billion$4.75 billion8.91Insider Selling
Cullen/Frost Bankers logo
CFR
Cullen/Frost Bankers
2.2$87.82+2.1%$5.52 billion$1.50 billion16.51
First American Financial logo
FAF
First American Financial
2.2$49.41+2.0%$5.52 billion$6.20 billion8.73Analyst Downgrade
TCF Financial logo
TCF
TCF Financial
2.0$35.99+4.1%$5.49 billion$1.61 billion18.94
First Industrial Realty Trust logo
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust
1.6$42.45+0.2%$5.48 billion$425.98 million25.88
EastGroup Properties logo
EGP
EastGroup Properties
1.8$138.00+0.3%$5.46 billion$331.39 million44.52
First Citizens BancShares logo
FCNCA
First Citizens BancShares
0.9$554.02+1.5%$5.44 billion$1.82 billion12.65
Kinsale Capital Group logo
KNSL
Kinsale Capital Group
1.9$238.41+0.9%$5.41 billion$315.89 million79.74
AerCap logo
AER
AerCap
1.4$40.63+3.4%$5.35 billion$4.94 billion-156.27Analyst Upgrade
AGPYY
Agile Group
1.7$68.23+0.0%$5.35 billion$8.72 billion4.87
City Developments logo
CDEVY
City Developments
1.5$5.80+1.4%$5.33 billion$2.51 billion12.89Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Heavy News Reporting
ORCC
Owl Rock Capital
1.6$13.72+0.1%$5.33 billion$718.02 million20.48
Life Storage logo
LSI
Life Storage
1.7$109.53+1.6%$5.32 billion$574.74 million33.50Unusual Options Activity
CoreSite Realty logo
COR
CoreSite Realty
1.3$124.31+0.0%$5.32 billion$572.73 million61.85Insider Selling
Janus Henderson Group logo
JHG
Janus Henderson Group
1.6$29.26+0.6%$5.31 billion$2.19 billion66.50
Starwood Property Trust logo
STWD
Starwood Property Trust
1.7$18.61+2.7%$5.30 billion$1.20 billion13.99
Primerica logo
PRI
Primerica
2.2$134.74+0.7%$5.30 billion$2.05 billion15.35
Credit Acceptance logo
CACC
Credit Acceptance
1.1$298.34+3.1%$5.27 billion$1.49 billion13.00
Essent Group logo
ESNT
Essent Group
2.1$45.78+1.0%$5.15 billion$867.57 million9.89Analyst Upgrade
TFS Financial logo
TFSL
TFS Financial
1.1$18.11+1.1%$5.07 billion$502.55 million54.88Dividend Announcement
Cousins Properties logo
CUZ
Cousins Properties
1.8$34.13+1.4%$5.07 billion$657.52 million14.65Analyst Revision
Kemper logo
KMPR
Kemper
1.9$77.48+0.4%$5.07 billion$5.04 billion11.85Analyst Revision
South State logo
SSB
South State
1.9$71.21+3.3%$5.05 billion$734.39 million41.89Insider Selling
Stifel Financial logo
SF
Stifel Financial
1.1$72.56+0.0%$4.98 billion$3.34 billion13.39
BOK Financial logo
BOKF
BOK Financial
2.4$70.77+2.9%$4.98 billion$2.23 billion12.75
ONEXF
Onex
1.3$54.90+0.1%$4.97 billion$1.11 billion-79.56
Synovus Financial logo
SNV
Synovus Financial
2.2$33.35+1.4%$4.93 billion$2.41 billion14.50Analyst Report
Heavy News Reporting
First Financial Bankshares logo
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares
1.2$34.55+1.9%$4.91 billion$427.62 million26.37Insider Selling
Brixmor Property Group logo
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
1.3$16.49+1.9%$4.89 billion$1.17 billion31.11
Derwent London logo
DWVYF
Derwent London
0.9$43.00+0.0%$4.81 billionN/A0.00Heavy News Reporting
Redfin logo
RDFN
Redfin
1.4$46.84+2.8%$4.79 billion$779.80 million-64.16Analyst Downgrade
Texas Pacific Land Trust logo
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Trust
2.2$616.97+2.4%$4.79 billion$490.50 million22.11Dividend Announcement
This page was last updated on 11/26/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.