S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.18 (-1.61%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.18 (-1.61%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.18 (-1.61%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
S&P 500   3,768.47 (-1.34%)
DOW   30,924.14 (-1.11%)
QQQ   304.18 (-1.61%)
AAPL   120.13 (-1.58%)
MSFT   226.73 (-0.36%)
FB   257.64 (+0.87%)
GOOGL   2,033.93 (+1.12%)
TSLA   621.44 (-4.86%)
AMZN   2,977.57 (-0.91%)
NVDA   494.81 (-3.39%)
BABA   230.50 (-2.44%)
CGC   31.01 (-6.71%)
GE   13.57 (+0.97%)
MU   84.33 (-5.36%)
NIO   39.28 (-5.42%)
AMD   77.75 (-3.85%)
T   28.92 (+0.70%)
F   11.93 (-1.97%)
ACB   9.82 (-6.12%)
DIS   188.03 (-2.20%)
BA   224.71 (-1.68%)
NFLX   511.29 (-1.81%)
BAC   36.50 (+0.22%)
Log in
OTCMKTS:HRCXF

Hurricane Energy Competitors

$0.05
-0.01 (-17.86 %)
(As of 03/3/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.04
Now: $0.05
$0.05
50-Day Range
$0.04
MA: $0.05
$0.06
52-Week Range
$0.03
Now: $0.05
$0.17
Volume165,320 shs
Average Volume838,342 shs
Market Capitalization$91.55 million
P/E Ratio4.60
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.18

Competitors

Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) Vs. TUSK, NGS, USWS, KLXE, NINE, and RNGR

Should you be buying HRCXF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Hurricane Energy, including Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK), Natural Gas Services Group (NGS), U.S. Well Services (USWS), KLX Energy Services (KLXE), Nine Energy Service (NINE), and Ranger Energy Services (RNGR).

Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Mammoth Energy Services' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hurricane Energy$170.28 million0.54$19.90 million$0.014.60
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.42$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A

Hurricane Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mammoth Energy Services.

Volatility and Risk

Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Hurricane Energy and Mammoth Energy Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hurricane Energy14001.80
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Mammoth Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hurricane EnergyN/AN/AN/A
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hurricane Energy beats Mammoth Energy Services on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) and Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Natural Gas Services Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hurricane Energy$170.28 million0.54$19.90 million$0.014.60
Natural Gas Services Group$78.44 million1.73$-13,860,000.00N/AN/A

Hurricane Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Natural Gas Services Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Hurricane Energy and Natural Gas Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hurricane Energy14001.80
Natural Gas Services Group00203.00

Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.75%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Hurricane Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Natural Gas Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hurricane EnergyN/AN/AN/A
Natural Gas Services Group2.79%-1.04%-0.87%

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats Hurricane Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) and U.S. Well Services (NASDAQ:USWS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Well Services has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hurricane Energy and U.S. Well Services' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hurricane Energy$170.28 million0.54$19.90 million$0.014.60
U.S. Well Services$514.76 million0.21$-93,910,000.00($1.72)-0.86

Hurricane Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Well Services. U.S. Well Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hurricane Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

46.9% of U.S. Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 10.5% of U.S. Well Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Hurricane Energy and U.S. Well Services, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hurricane Energy14001.80
U.S. Well Services02002.00

U.S. Well Services has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 31.51%. Given U.S. Well Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe U.S. Well Services is more favorable than Hurricane Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Hurricane Energy and U.S. Well Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hurricane EnergyN/AN/AN/A
U.S. Well Services-83.03%-154.88%-21.32%

Summary

Hurricane Energy beats U.S. Well Services on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLX Energy Services (NASDAQ:KLXE) and Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for KLX Energy Services and Hurricane Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KLX Energy Services02202.50
Hurricane Energy14001.80

KLX Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 44.82%. Given KLX Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLX Energy Services is more favorable than Hurricane Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.8% of KLX Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.7% of KLX Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

KLX Energy Services has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares KLX Energy Services and Hurricane Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KLX Energy Services-113.15%-76.92%-22.85%
Hurricane EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KLX Energy Services and Hurricane Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KLX Energy Services$544 million0.21$-96,400,000.00($21.60)-0.61
Hurricane Energy$170.28 million0.54$19.90 million$0.014.60

Hurricane Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than KLX Energy Services. KLX Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hurricane Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) and Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Hurricane Energy and Nine Energy Service, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hurricane Energy14001.80
Nine Energy Service18001.89

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.98%. Given Nine Energy Service's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than Hurricane Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, meaning that its share price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Nine Energy Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hurricane EnergyN/AN/AN/A
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Nine Energy Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hurricane Energy$170.28 million0.54$19.90 million$0.014.60
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53

Hurricane Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nine Energy Service. Hurricane Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nine Energy Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nine Energy Service beats Hurricane Energy on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hurricane Energy (OTCMKTS:HRCXF) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Ranger Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hurricane EnergyN/AN/AN/A
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hurricane Energy and Ranger Energy Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hurricane Energy$170.28 million0.54$19.90 million$0.014.60
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00

Hurricane Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ranger Energy Services. Hurricane Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Hurricane Energy has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Hurricane Energy and Ranger Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hurricane Energy14001.80
Ranger Energy Services02202.50

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $6.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.25%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Hurricane Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Hurricane Energy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Hurricane Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$5.72-5.4%$261.78 million$625.01 million-1.65Earnings Announcement
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.09-3.0%$139.94 million$78.44 million72.07Increase in Short Interest
U.S. Well Services logo
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.0$1.48-12.2%$122.96 million$514.76 million-0.34Decrease in Short Interest
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$13.12-6.6%$119.06 million$544 million-0.20Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Nine Energy Service logo
NINE
Nine Energy Service
0.6$3.37-0.0%$106.36 million$832.94 million-0.18Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.0$5.75-3.0%$91.14 million$336.90 million-7.01Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
ENGT
Energy & Technology
0.6$0.55-81.8%$91.06 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.6$1.92-0.5%$90.92 million$476.58 million-1.78Gap Down
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$33.34-12.1%$88.24 million$205.49 million-1.14Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
Key Energy Services logo
KEGX
Key Energy Services
1.1$5.35-0.0%$73.73 million$413.85 million-0.08Upcoming Earnings
SPNVD
Superior Energy Services
0.6N/AN/A$69.78 million$2.13 billion-0.53News Coverage
RCON
Recon Technology
0.6$2.20-4.5%$37.63 million$9.30 million0.00Gap Down
WGRP
(WGRP)
0.0$0.59-0.3%$37.36 million$849.98 million0.00
NES
Nuverra Environmental Solutions
1.0$1.98-15.7%$36.12 million$168.24 million-0.42Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Enservco logo
ENSV
Enservco
0.7$1.84-8.7%$21.74 million$43.03 million-2.45
BASX
Basic Energy Services
0.1$0.32-0.1%$7.96 million$567.25 million-0.03Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
SPNX
Superior Energy Services
1.1$0.14-0.0%$2.09 million$1.43 billion-0.01Upcoming Earnings
Eco-Stim Energy Solutions logo
ESES
Eco-Stim Energy Solutions
0.4$0.00-0.0%$68,000.00$40.71 million0.00
ESESQ
Eco-Stim Energy Solutions
0.0$0.00-0.0%$68,000.00$40.71 million0.00
PTRO
Petrominerals
0.0$0.04-0.0%$48,000.00N/A0.00
ERHE
ERHC Energy
0.4$0.00-0.0%$19,000.00N/A0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Cal Dive International logo
CDVIQ
Cal Dive International
0.0$0.01-6.2%$0.00N/A0.00News Coverage
This page was last updated on 3/4/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.