OTCMKTS:HREEF

Stans Energy Competitors

$0.02

+0.01 (+90.91 %)

(As of 05/6/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$0.02

▼

$0.02

50-Day Range

$0.01

▼

$0.03

52-Week Range

$0.00

▼

$0.18

Volume34,900 shs

Average Volume72,803 shs

Market Capitalization$3.93 million

P/E Ratio0.18

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.15

Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) Vs. VSMR, CEGMF, THMG, PGXPF, AXXDF, and RCCMF

Should you be buying HREEF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "metal mining" are considered alternatives and competitors to Stans Energy, including Verify Smart (VSMR), Cerro Grande Mining (CEGMF), Thunder Mountain Gold (THMG), Pelangio Exploration (PGXPF), Alderon Iron Ore (AXXDF), and Nippon Dragon Resources (RCCMF).

Stans Energy vs. Verify Smart Stock

Verify Smart (OTCMKTS:VSMR) and Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Verify Smart and Stans Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Verify Smart	N/A	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	-328.61%	20,157.94%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Verify Smart and Stans Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Verify Smart	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	N/A	$-1,300,000.00	N/A	N/A

Volatility and Risk

Verify Smart has a beta of 2.37, meaning that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stans Energy has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Verify Smart and Stans Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Verify Smart	0	0	0	0	N/A
Stans Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Verify Smart beats Stans Energy on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stans Energy vs. Cerro Grande Mining Stock

Cerro Grande Mining (OTCMKTS:CEGMF) and Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Cerro Grande Mining and Stans Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cerro Grande Mining	0	0	0	0	N/A
Stans Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cerro Grande Mining and Stans Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cerro Grande Mining	N/A	N/A	$-820,000.00	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	N/A	$-1,300,000.00	N/A	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Cerro Grande Mining and Stans Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cerro Grande Mining	N/A	N/A	-105.09%
Stans Energy	N/A	-328.61%	20,157.94%

Volatility & Risk

Cerro Grande Mining has a beta of -4.91, meaning that its stock price is 591% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stans Energy has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Stans Energy vs. Thunder Mountain Gold Stock

Thunder Mountain Gold (OTCMKTS:THMG) and Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Thunder Mountain Gold and Stans Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thunder Mountain Gold	211.50%	182.13%	65.01%
Stans Energy	N/A	-328.61%	20,157.94%

Volatility & Risk

Thunder Mountain Gold has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stans Energy has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its share price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Thunder Mountain Gold and Stans Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thunder Mountain Gold	$1.95 million	4.94	$1.08 million	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	N/A	$-1,300,000.00	N/A	N/A

Thunder Mountain Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Stans Energy.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Thunder Mountain Gold and Stans Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thunder Mountain Gold	0	0	0	0	N/A
Stans Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Thunder Mountain Gold beats Stans Energy on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stans Energy vs. Pelangio Exploration Stock

Pelangio Exploration (OTCMKTS:PGXPF) and Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Pelangio Exploration has a beta of -0.34, indicating that its stock price is 134% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stans Energy has a beta of 0.15, indicating that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pelangio Exploration and Stans Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pelangio Exploration	N/A	N/A	$-1,050,000.00	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	N/A	$-1,300,000.00	N/A	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Pelangio Exploration and Stans Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pelangio Exploration	N/A	-850.66%	-214.34%
Stans Energy	N/A	-328.61%	20,157.94%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Pelangio Exploration and Stans Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pelangio Exploration	0	0	0	0	N/A
Stans Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Stans Energy beats Pelangio Exploration on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stans Energy vs. Alderon Iron Ore Stock

Alderon Iron Ore (OTCMKTS:AXXDF) and Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Alderon Iron Ore and Stans Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alderon Iron Ore	N/A	N/A	$-3,570,000.00	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	N/A	$-1,300,000.00	N/A	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Alderon Iron Ore and Stans Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alderon Iron Ore	N/A	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	-328.61%	20,157.94%

Risk and Volatility

Alderon Iron Ore has a beta of 2.65, meaning that its stock price is 165% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stans Energy has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Alderon Iron Ore and Stans Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alderon Iron Ore	0	0	0	0	N/A
Stans Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Stans Energy vs. Nippon Dragon Resources Stock

Nippon Dragon Resources (OTCMKTS:RCCMF) and Stans Energy (OTCMKTS:HREEF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Nippon Dragon Resources and Stans Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nippon Dragon Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A
Stans Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nippon Dragon Resources and Stans Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nippon Dragon Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	N/A	$-1,300,000.00	N/A	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Nippon Dragon Resources and Stans Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nippon Dragon Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Stans Energy	N/A	-328.61%	20,157.94%

Volatility and Risk

Nippon Dragon Resources has a beta of 6.05, suggesting that its stock price is 505% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stans Energy has a beta of 0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Nippon Dragon Resources beats Stans Energy on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.