IMI Competitors

Ferrovial (OTCMKTS:FRRVY) and IMI (OTCMKTS:IMIAY) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ferrovial and IMI's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

IMI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrovial.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrovial and IMI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of Ferrovial shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Ferrovial has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IMI has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ferrovial and IMI, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

NVR (NYSE:NVR) and IMI (OTCMKTS:IMIAY) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares NVR and IMI's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

NVR has higher revenue and earnings than IMI. NVR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IMI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares NVR and IMI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of NVR shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of NVR shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

NVR has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, IMI has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for NVR and IMI, as provided by MarketBeat.

NVR presently has a consensus target price of $5,257.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.80%. Given NVR's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe NVR is more favorable than IMI.

Summary

NVR beats IMI on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rollins (NYSE:ROL) and IMI (OTCMKTS:IMIAY) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Dividends

Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. IMI pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Rollins pays out 65.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IMI pays out 90.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Rollins has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Rollins and IMI's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Rollins has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IMI. IMI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Rollins and IMI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

25.7% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. 54.9% of Rollins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Rollins has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IMI has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Rollins and IMI, as provided by MarketBeat.

Rollins presently has a consensus target price of $32.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 1.52%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than IMI.

Summary

Rollins beats IMI on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

HeidelbergCement (OTCMKTS:HDELY) and IMI (OTCMKTS:IMIAY) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Dividends

HeidelbergCement pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. IMI pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. HeidelbergCement pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IMI pays out 90.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares HeidelbergCement and IMI's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

HeidelbergCement has higher revenue and earnings than IMI. HeidelbergCement is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IMI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares HeidelbergCement and IMI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of HeidelbergCement shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

HeidelbergCement has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IMI has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for HeidelbergCement and IMI, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

IMI beats HeidelbergCement on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Atlantia (OTCMKTS:ATASY) and IMI (OTCMKTS:IMIAY) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Atlantia and IMI, as provided by MarketBeat.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of Atlantia shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Atlantia has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IMI has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Atlantia and IMI's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

IMI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Atlantia. IMI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atlantia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Atlantia and IMI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

IMI beats Atlantia on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

IMI (OTCMKTS:IMIAY) and Jacobs Engineering Group (NYSE:J) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares IMI and Jacobs Engineering Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Jacobs Engineering Group has higher revenue and earnings than IMI. IMI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jacobs Engineering Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares IMI and Jacobs Engineering Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for IMI and Jacobs Engineering Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Jacobs Engineering Group has a consensus price target of $117.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 2.39%. Given Jacobs Engineering Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jacobs Engineering Group is more favorable than IMI.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.0% of Jacobs Engineering Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Jacobs Engineering Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

IMI pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Jacobs Engineering Group pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. IMI pays out 90.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jacobs Engineering Group pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jacobs Engineering Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

IMI has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jacobs Engineering Group has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Jacobs Engineering Group beats IMI on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.