Global Crossing Airlines Group Competitors

Global Crossing Airlines Group (OTCMKTS:JETMF) and Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Global Crossing Airlines Group and Vulcan Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Global Crossing Airlines Group and Vulcan Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Risk and Volatility

Global Crossing Airlines Group has a beta of 25.73, meaning that its stock price is 2,473% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.8% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Global Crossing Airlines Group and Vulcan Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus target price of $147.0556, suggesting a potential downside of 15.73%. Given Vulcan Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Summary

Vulcan Materials beats Global Crossing Airlines Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Global Crossing Airlines Group (OTCMKTS:JETMF) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Martin Marietta Materials and Global Crossing Airlines Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Martin Marietta Materials presently has a consensus price target of $280.2222, indicating a potential downside of 18.68%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Global Crossing Airlines Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Crossing Airlines Group has a beta of 25.73, meaning that its stock price is 2,473% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Global Crossing Airlines Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Global Crossing Airlines Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (NYSE:SQM) and Global Crossing Airlines Group (OTCMKTS:JETMF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.8% of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Crossing Airlines Group has a beta of 25.73, indicating that its share price is 2,473% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile and Global Crossing Airlines Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile and Global Crossing Airlines Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile presently has a consensus target price of $53.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.78%. Given Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile is more favorable than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile and Global Crossing Airlines Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has higher revenue and earnings than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Summary

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile beats Global Crossing Airlines Group on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Global Crossing Airlines Group (OTCMKTS:JETMF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Global Crossing Airlines Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Teck Resources and Global Crossing Airlines Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Global Crossing Airlines Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Teck Resources and Global Crossing Airlines Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Teck Resources presently has a consensus target price of $25.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Given Teck Resources' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Volatility and Risk

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Crossing Airlines Group has a beta of 25.73, suggesting that its stock price is 2,473% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

47.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Teck Resources beats Global Crossing Airlines Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) and Global Crossing Airlines Group (OTCMKTS:JETMF) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Global Crossing Airlines Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Crossing Airlines Group has a beta of 25.73, meaning that its stock price is 2,473% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Global Crossing Airlines Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MDU Resources Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for MDU Resources Group and Global Crossing Airlines Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

MDU Resources Group presently has a consensus target price of $28.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 14.30%. Given MDU Resources Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than Global Crossing Airlines Group.

Summary

MDU Resources Group beats Global Crossing Airlines Group on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lynas Rare Earths (OTCMKTS:LYSDY) and Global Crossing Airlines Group (OTCMKTS:JETMF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lynas Rare Earths and Global Crossing Airlines Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Global Crossing Airlines Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lynas Rare Earths.

Risk & Volatility

Lynas Rare Earths has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Crossing Airlines Group has a beta of 25.73, suggesting that its stock price is 2,473% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Lynas Rare Earths and Global Crossing Airlines Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares Lynas Rare Earths and Global Crossing Airlines Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lynas Rare Earths beats Global Crossing Airlines Group on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.