KLDiscovery Competitors

KLDiscovery (OTCMKTS:KLDI) and Model N (NYSE:MODN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

KLDiscovery has a beta of -0.04, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Model N has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares KLDiscovery and Model N's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KLDiscovery and Model N's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Model N has lower revenue, but higher earnings than KLDiscovery. Model N is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLDiscovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.4% of Model N shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.6% of KLDiscovery shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Model N shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for KLDiscovery and Model N, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

KLDiscovery currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.71%. Model N has a consensus target price of $43.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.73%. Given KLDiscovery's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe KLDiscovery is more favorable than Model N.

Summary

Model N beats KLDiscovery on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLDiscovery (OTCMKTS:KLDI) and EverQuote (NASDAQ:EVER) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for KLDiscovery and EverQuote, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

KLDiscovery currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.71%. EverQuote has a consensus target price of $57.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 58.07%. Given KLDiscovery's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe KLDiscovery is more favorable than EverQuote.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

60.9% of EverQuote shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.6% of KLDiscovery shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 45.7% of EverQuote shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares KLDiscovery and EverQuote's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KLDiscovery and EverQuote's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EverQuote has lower revenue, but higher earnings than KLDiscovery. EverQuote is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLDiscovery, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

KLDiscovery has a beta of -0.04, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EverQuote has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

EverQuote beats KLDiscovery on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GAN (NASDAQ:GAN) and KLDiscovery (OTCMKTS:KLDI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for GAN and KLDiscovery, as provided by MarketBeat.

GAN currently has a consensus target price of $27.25, suggesting a potential upside of 38.68%. KLDiscovery has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.71%. Given KLDiscovery's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KLDiscovery is more favorable than GAN.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.1% of GAN shares are held by institutional investors. 42.6% of KLDiscovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares GAN and KLDiscovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GAN and KLDiscovery's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GAN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than KLDiscovery.

Summary

GAN beats KLDiscovery on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

HealthStream (NASDAQ:HSTM) and KLDiscovery (OTCMKTS:KLDI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for HealthStream and KLDiscovery, as provided by MarketBeat.

HealthStream currently has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.59%. KLDiscovery has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.71%. Given KLDiscovery's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KLDiscovery is more favorable than HealthStream.

Volatility and Risk

HealthStream has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KLDiscovery has a beta of -0.04, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares HealthStream and KLDiscovery's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

HealthStream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than KLDiscovery. KLDiscovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HealthStream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares HealthStream and KLDiscovery's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.1% of HealthStream shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of HealthStream shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 42.6% of KLDiscovery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HealthStream beats KLDiscovery on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLDiscovery (OTCMKTS:KLDI) and Qutoutiao (NASDAQ:QTT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for KLDiscovery and Qutoutiao, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

KLDiscovery currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.71%. Given KLDiscovery's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe KLDiscovery is more favorable than Qutoutiao.

Volatility and Risk

KLDiscovery has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Qutoutiao has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KLDiscovery and Qutoutiao's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KLDiscovery has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Qutoutiao. KLDiscovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Qutoutiao, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares KLDiscovery and Qutoutiao's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

KLDiscovery beats Qutoutiao on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLDiscovery (OTCMKTS:KLDI) and Sify Technologies (NASDAQ:SIFY) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

KLDiscovery has a beta of -0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sify Technologies has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for KLDiscovery and Sify Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

KLDiscovery currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.71%. Given KLDiscovery's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe KLDiscovery is more favorable than Sify Technologies.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KLDiscovery and Sify Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sify Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than KLDiscovery.

Profitability

This table compares KLDiscovery and Sify Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.8% of Sify Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 42.6% of KLDiscovery shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 77.0% of Sify Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sify Technologies beats KLDiscovery on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.