OTCMKTS:KLYCY

Kunlun Energy Competitors

$10.96
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$10.96
Now: $10.96
$10.96
50-Day Range
$10.00
MA: $10.24
$10.96
52-Week Range
$5.32
Now: $10.96
$10.96
VolumeN/A
Average Volume1,520 shs
Market Capitalization$9.49 billion
P/E Ratio10.64
Dividend Yield2.92%
Beta1.33

Competitors

Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) Vs. SCHYY, PDYPY, KHNGY, SVNDY, SDVKY, and JAPAY

Should you be buying KLYCY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "private households" are considered alternatives and competitors to Kunlun Energy, including Sands China (SCHYY), Flutter Entertainment (PDYPY), Kuehne + Nagel International (KHNGY), Seven & i (SVNDY), Sandvik AB (publ) (SDVKY), and Japan Tobacco (JAPAY).

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Kunlun Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A
Kunlun EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kunlun Energy has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Sands China and Kunlun Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sands China01102.50
Kunlun Energy01002.00

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sands China and Kunlun Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sands China$8.81 billion4.29$2.03 billion$2.5118.62
Kunlun Energy$16.09 billion0.59$803.23 million$1.0310.64

Sands China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kunlun Energy. Kunlun Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sands China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Sands China beats Kunlun Energy on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flutter Entertainment (OTCMKTS:PDYPY) and Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Flutter Entertainment and Kunlun Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flutter Entertainment$2.73 billion13.41$183.87 million$1.9154.80
Kunlun Energy$16.09 billion0.59$803.23 million$1.0310.64

Kunlun Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Flutter Entertainment. Kunlun Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flutter Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kunlun Energy has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Flutter Entertainment and Kunlun Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flutter EntertainmentN/AN/AN/A
Kunlun EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.4% of Flutter Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Flutter Entertainment and Kunlun Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flutter Entertainment34402.09
Kunlun Energy01002.00

Summary

Flutter Entertainment beats Kunlun Energy on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kuehne + Nagel International (OTCMKTS:KHNGY) and Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kuehne + Nagel International and Kunlun Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kuehne + Nagel International$21.23 billion1.68$803.19 million$1.3444.46
Kunlun Energy$16.09 billion0.59$803.23 million$1.0310.64

Kunlun Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kuehne + Nagel International. Kunlun Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kuehne + Nagel International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Kuehne + Nagel International has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kunlun Energy has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Kuehne + Nagel International and Kunlun Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kuehne + Nagel International3.88%34.26%8.27%
Kunlun EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Kuehne + Nagel International pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kunlun Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kuehne + Nagel International pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kunlun Energy pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kunlun Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Kuehne + Nagel International and Kunlun Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kuehne + Nagel International55001.50
Kunlun Energy01002.00

Summary

Kuehne + Nagel International beats Kunlun Energy on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Seven & i (OTCMKTS:SVNDY) and Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Seven & i and Kunlun Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seven & i$61.13 billion0.58$2.01 billion$1.5113.33
Kunlun Energy$16.09 billion0.59$803.23 million$1.0310.64

Seven & i has higher revenue and earnings than Kunlun Energy. Kunlun Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seven & i, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Seven & i has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kunlun Energy has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Seven & i and Kunlun Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Seven & i3.02%9.95%4.43%
Kunlun EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Dividends

Seven & i pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Kunlun Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Seven & i pays out 21.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kunlun Energy pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Seven & i shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Seven & i and Kunlun Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Seven & i00103.00
Kunlun Energy01002.00

Summary

Seven & i beats Kunlun Energy on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sandvik AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:SDVKY) and Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Kunlun Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sandvik AB (publ)$10.92 billion3.22$903.43 million$1.1823.74
Kunlun Energy$16.09 billion0.59$803.23 million$1.0310.64

Sandvik AB (publ) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kunlun Energy. Kunlun Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sandvik AB (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Sandvik AB (publ) has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kunlun Energy has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Kunlun Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sandvik AB (publ)6.75%19.81%10.54%
Kunlun EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Sandvik AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Sandvik AB (publ) and Kunlun Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sandvik AB (publ)321102.50
Kunlun Energy01002.00

Summary

Sandvik AB (publ) beats Kunlun Energy on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Japan Tobacco (OTCMKTS:JAPAY) and Kunlun Energy (OTCMKTS:KLYCY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Japan Tobacco and Kunlun Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Japan Tobacco13.61%11.20%5.45%
Kunlun EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Risk and Volatility

Japan Tobacco has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kunlun Energy has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Japan Tobacco and Kunlun Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Japan Tobacco$19.96 billion1.68$3.20 billion$0.9010.52
Kunlun Energy$16.09 billion0.59$803.23 million$1.0310.64

Japan Tobacco has higher revenue and earnings than Kunlun Energy. Japan Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kunlun Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Japan Tobacco shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Japan Tobacco and Kunlun Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Japan Tobacco01002.00
Kunlun Energy01002.00

Dividends

Japan Tobacco pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Kunlun Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Japan Tobacco pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kunlun Energy pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Japan Tobacco beats Kunlun Energy on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Kunlun Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Sands China logo
SCHYY
Sands China
0.9$46.73flat$37.81 billion$8.81 billion18.62Decrease in Short Interest
Flutter Entertainment logo
PDYPY
Flutter Entertainment
0.4$104.66flat$36.65 billion$2.73 billion54.80Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Kuehne + Nagel International logo
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International
0.9$59.58flat$35.67 billion$21.23 billion44.13Decrease in Short Interest
Seven & i logo
SVNDY
Seven & i
1.6$20.13flat$35.61 billion$61.13 billion21.42Gap Down
Sandvik AB (publ) logo
SDVKY
Sandvik AB (publ)
0.8$28.01flat$35.14 billion$10.92 billion52.85Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Japan Tobacco logo
JAPAY
Japan Tobacco
1.2$9.47flat$33.59 billion$19.96 billion12.46
Experian logo
EXPGY
Experian
1.1$36.54flat$33.52 billion$5.18 billion35.82Decrease in Short Interest
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) logo
HNNMY
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.7$4.58flat$33.45 billion$24.63 billion152.67Upcoming Earnings
Techtronic Industries logo
TTNDY
Techtronic Industries
0.2$88.65flat$32.50 billion$7.67 billion0.00Gap Up
Amadeus IT Group logo
AMADY
Amadeus IT Group
0.5$69.61flat$31.36 billion$6.25 billion-240.03
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) logo
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
1.2$14.84flat$31.30 billion$9.95 billion36.18Decrease in Short Interest
Fujitsu logo
FJTSY
Fujitsu
0.9$30.47flat$30.88 billion$35.49 billion23.08Decrease in Short Interest
CK Hutchison logo
CKHUY
CK Hutchison
0.7$7.95flat$30.64 billion$38.34 billion0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Swire Pacific logo
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
1.6$7.87flat$30.59 billion$10.93 billion3.14Decrease in Short Interest
Ashtead Group logo
ASHTY
Ashtead Group
1.2$254.23flat$28.56 billion$5.84 billion35.11Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Sampo Oyj logo
SAXPY
Sampo Oyj
0.8$23.99flat$26.87 billion$12.62 billion18.74
Associated British Foods logo
ASBFY
Associated British Foods
0.9$33.82flat$26.77 billion$18.00 billion32.21Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions logo
MGDDY
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
1.5$29.78flat$26.56 billion$27.03 billion13.72Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Zalando logo
ZLNDY
Zalando
0.4$50.68flat$25.87 billion$7.26 billion230.37Analyst Upgrade
Gap Up
Wilmar International logo
WLMIY
Wilmar International
0.7$40.93flat$25.86 billion$42.64 billion20.06Increase in Short Interest
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) logo
SNPTF
Sunny Optical Technology (Group)
0.5$22.95flat$25.17 billion$5.48 billion0.00
Unicharm logo
UNICY
Unicharm
0.9$8.40flat$24.94 billion$6.55 billion64.62
UniCredit logo
UNCFF
UniCredit
1.2$10.62flat$23.79 billion$25.52 billion11.06
Kerry Group logo
KRYAY
Kerry Group
1.2$132.46flat$23.41 billion$8.11 billion30.04Gap Up
China CITIC Bank logo
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank
0.9$9.38flat$22.95 billion$47.62 billion0.00
CIADY
China Mengniu Dairy
0.9$57.53flat$22.71 billion$11.44 billion37.85
Shimano logo
SMNNY
Shimano
0.5$24.47flat$22.68 billion$3.33 billion41.84Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
SGS logo
SGSOY
SGS
1.3$29.56flat$22.36 billion$6.64 billion33.21Decrease in Short Interest
BAE Systems logo
BAESY
BAE Systems
1.4$27.78flat$22.36 billion$22.52 billion13.62Dividend Increase
Ocado Group logo
OCDDY
Ocado Group
0.4$59.00flat$22.09 billion$2.26 billion-77.63Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Sysmex logo
SSMXY
Sysmex
0.6$51.14flat$21.42 billion$2.78 billion77.48
Suzuki Motor logo
SZKMY
Suzuki Motor
1.5$173.05flat$21.24 billion$32.03 billion20.53Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Sino Biopharmaceutical logo
SBMFF
Sino Biopharmaceutical
0.8$1.06flat$19.92 billion$3.51 billion0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Secom logo
SOMLY
Secom
1.3$21.31flat$19.89 billion$9.75 billion25.99Decrease in Short Interest
Nomura Research Institute logo
NRILY
Nomura Research Institute
1.1$30.81flat$19.74 billion$4.87 billion36.25Decrease in Short Interest
Eisai logo
ESALY
Eisai
1.3$66.38flat$19.69 billion$6.40 billion17.15Decrease in Short Interest
Ferrovial logo
FRRVY
Ferrovial
0.5$26.20flat$19.20 billion$6.78 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Rakuten logo
RKUNY
Rakuten
0.6$12.17flat$19.17 billion$11.60 billion-19.95Increase in Short Interest
Eurofins Scientific logo
ERFSF
Eurofins Scientific
0.9$102.67flat$18.28 billion$5.19 billion45.43
Deutsche Wohnen logo
DWHHF
Deutsche Wohnen
0.9$48.28flat$17.37 billion$937.88 million14.12
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group logo
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
1.2$16.98flat$16.98 billion$7.26 billion45.89News Coverage
OMRON logo
OMRNY
OMRON
1.0$81.47flat$16.80 billion$6.24 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
OMV Aktiengesellschaft logo
OMVJF
OMV Aktiengesellschaft
1.0$51.22flat$16.72 billion$26.28 billion-51.74
NN Group logo
NNGRY
NN Group
1.1$25.15flat$16.61 billion$22.92 billion7.81
COSCO SHIPPING logo
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING
0.8$7.84flat$16.01 billion$21.78 billion97.94
Atlantia logo
ATASY
Atlantia
0.6$9.64flat$15.92 billion$14.13 billion107.11Decrease in Short Interest
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock logo
SGTZY
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock
0.1$4.44flat$15.86 billion$28.13 billion0.00News Coverage
bioMérieux logo
BMXMF
bioMérieux
0.5$132.00flat$15.62 billion$3.00 billion51.16
Carrefour logo
CRRFY
Carrefour
1.1$3.59flat$14.68 billion$81.09 billion13.81Increase in Short Interest
Terna - Rete Elettrica Nazionale Società per Azioni logo
TEZNY
Terna - Rete Elettrica Nazionale Società per Azioni
0.6$21.75flat$14.57 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.