OTCMKTS:MEEC

Midwest Energy Emissions Competitors

$1.16
+0.02 (+1.75 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 08:27 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.12
Now: $1.16
$1.16
50-Day Range
$1.04
MA: $1.16
$1.31
52-Week Range
$0.05
Now: $1.16
$1.85
Volume77,700 shs
Average Volume381,275 shs
Market Capitalization$97.11 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.97

Competitors

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) Vs. TMO, ROK, TRMB, MEGGY, ONTO, and CUB

Should you be buying MEEC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "measuring & controlling devices, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Midwest Energy Emissions, including Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), Rockwell Automation (ROK), Trimble (TRMB), Meggitt (MEGGY), Onto Innovation (ONTO), and Cubic (CUB).

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:TMO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Thermo Fisher Scientific, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Midwest Energy Emissions0000N/A
Thermo Fisher Scientific031702.85

Thermo Fisher Scientific has a consensus price target of $526.3684, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Given Thermo Fisher Scientific's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thermo Fisher Scientific is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Thermo Fisher Scientific's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Midwest Energy Emissions$11.42 million8.50$-6,100,000.00N/AN/A
Thermo Fisher Scientific$25.54 billion7.38$3.70 billion$12.3538.78

Thermo Fisher Scientific has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.2% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Thermo Fisher Scientific's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Midwest Energy Emissions-63.45%N/A-66.56%
Thermo Fisher Scientific17.12%21.35%10.55%

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Thermo Fisher Scientific has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Thermo Fisher Scientific beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Rockwell Automation (NYSE:ROK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Rockwell Automation, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Midwest Energy Emissions0000N/A
Rockwell Automation39702.21

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $248.1538, indicating a potential downside of 6.21%. Given Rockwell Automation's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rockwell Automation is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Rockwell Automation's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Midwest Energy Emissions$11.42 million8.50$-6,100,000.00N/AN/A
Rockwell Automation$6.33 billion4.86$1.02 billion$7.6834.45

Rockwell Automation has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.2% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Rockwell Automation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Midwest Energy Emissions-63.45%N/A-66.56%
Rockwell Automation16.17%81.39%12.65%

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Rockwell Automation beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Trimble, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Midwest Energy Emissions0000N/A
Trimble02602.75

Trimble has a consensus price target of $56.75, indicating a potential downside of 29.42%. Given Trimble's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trimble is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Trimble's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Midwest Energy Emissions$11.42 million8.50$-6,100,000.00N/AN/A
Trimble$3.26 billion6.19$514.30 million$1.7645.68

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.4% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Trimble shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Trimble's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Midwest Energy Emissions-63.45%N/A-66.56%
Trimble15.56%14.84%7.13%

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trimble has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Trimble beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Meggitt (OTCMKTS:MEGGY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Meggitt, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Midwest Energy Emissions0000N/A
Meggitt10001.00

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Meggitt's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Midwest Energy Emissions$11.42 million8.50$-6,100,000.00N/AN/A
Meggitt$2.91 billion1.84$284.24 millionN/AN/A

Meggitt has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Meggitt's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Midwest Energy Emissions-63.45%N/A-66.56%
MeggittN/AN/AN/A

Volatility & Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Meggitt has a beta of 2.02, indicating that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Meggitt beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Onto Innovation, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Midwest Energy Emissions0000N/A
Onto Innovation00403.00

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.85%. Given Onto Innovation's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Onto Innovation is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Onto Innovation's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Midwest Energy Emissions$11.42 million8.50$-6,100,000.00N/AN/A
Onto Innovation$305.90 million11.31$1.91 million$1.3950.86

Onto Innovation has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Onto Innovation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Midwest Energy Emissions-63.45%N/A-66.56%
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Onto Innovation beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Cubic's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Midwest Energy Emissions$11.42 million8.50$-6,100,000.00N/AN/A
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.54

Cubic has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Cubic, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Midwest Energy Emissions0000N/A
Cubic08302.27

Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.20, indicating a potential downside of 12.87%. Given Cubic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cubic is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Volatility & Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Midwest Energy Emissions-63.45%N/A-66.56%
Cubic-0.26%10.97%4.72%

Summary

Cubic beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


Midwest Energy Emissions Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Thermo Fisher Scientific logo
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific
2.1$478.88+1.5%$188.58 billion$25.54 billion39.25News Coverage
Rockwell Automation logo
ROK
Rockwell Automation
2.4$264.59+1.3%$30.73 billion$6.33 billion30.17
Trimble logo
TRMB
Trimble
1.5$80.40+0.0%$20.21 billion$3.26 billion41.23
Meggitt logo
MEGGY
Meggitt
0.4$13.66+5.5%$5.34 billion$2.91 billion0.00Gap Down
Onto Innovation logo
ONTO
Onto Innovation
1.5$70.69+1.2%$3.46 billion$305.90 million-372.05News Coverage
Cubic logo
CUB
Cubic
1.4$74.83+0.0%$2.38 billion$1.48 billion-575.62
FARO Technologies logo
FARO
FARO Technologies
1.6$87.18+1.4%$1.57 billion$381.77 million-20.00
Oxford Instruments logo
OXINF
Oxford Instruments
0.6$25.15+2.4%$1.44 billionN/A0.00Gap Down
MTS Systems logo
MTSC
MTS Systems
0.9$58.49+0.0%$1.14 billion$828.59 million-4.14
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.7$8.71+0.1%$118.36 million$87.83 million-6.09
Mechanical Technology logo
MKTY
Mechanical Technology
0.7$9.03+3.5%$88.69 million$6.57 million0.00
Know Labs logo
KNWN
Know Labs
0.6$2.96+4.1%$83.25 million$120,000.000.00
Sierra Monitor logo
SRMC
Sierra Monitor
0.7$3.24+0.0%$33.62 million$22.08 million81.00
Image Sensing Systems logo
ISNS
Image Sensing Systems
0.6$4.64+1.5%$24.84 million$14.73 million42.19
MKRS
Mikros Systems
0.5$0.13+0.4%$4.62 million$6.37 million-13.00
Callitas Health logo
MPHMF
Callitas Health
0.4$0.04+2.6%$0.00$530,000.000.00Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.