Midwest Energy Emissions Competitors

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:TMO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Thermo Fisher Scientific, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has a consensus price target of $526.3684, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Given Thermo Fisher Scientific's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thermo Fisher Scientific is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Thermo Fisher Scientific's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.2% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Thermo Fisher Scientific's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Thermo Fisher Scientific has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Thermo Fisher Scientific beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Rockwell Automation (NYSE:ROK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Rockwell Automation, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $248.1538, indicating a potential downside of 6.21%. Given Rockwell Automation's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rockwell Automation is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Rockwell Automation's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Rockwell Automation has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.2% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Rockwell Automation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Rockwell Automation beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Trimble, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $56.75, indicating a potential downside of 29.42%. Given Trimble's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trimble is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Trimble's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Trimble has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.4% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Trimble shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Trimble's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trimble has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Trimble beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Meggitt (OTCMKTS:MEGGY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Meggitt, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Meggitt's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Meggitt has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Meggitt's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Meggitt has a beta of 2.02, indicating that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Meggitt beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Onto Innovation, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.85%. Given Onto Innovation's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Onto Innovation is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Onto Innovation's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Onto Innovation has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Midwest Energy Emissions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Onto Innovation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Onto Innovation beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Midwest Energy Emissions (OTCMKTS:MEEC) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Cubic's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cubic has higher revenue and earnings than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Midwest Energy Emissions and Cubic, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.20, indicating a potential downside of 12.87%. Given Cubic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cubic is more favorable than Midwest Energy Emissions.

Volatility & Risk

Midwest Energy Emissions has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Midwest Energy Emissions and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cubic beats Midwest Energy Emissions on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.