OTCMKTS:MHVYF

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Competitors

$30.55
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$30.55
Now: $30.55
$30.55
50-Day Range
$29.05
MA: $30.73
$33.23
52-Week Range
$20.73
Now: $30.55
$33.23
Volume15 shs
Average Volume643 shs
Market Capitalization$10.30 billion
P/E Ratio12.83
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.14

Competitors

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) Vs. CSUAY, VWDRY, SCHYY, CMPGY, PDYPY, and SDVKY

Should you be buying MHVYF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "private households" are considered alternatives and competitors to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, including China Shenhua Energy (CSUAY), Vestas Wind Systems A/S (VWDRY), Sands China (SCHYY), Compass Group (CMPGY), Flutter Entertainment (PDYPY), and Sandvik AB (publ) (SDVKY).

China Shenhua Energy (OTCMKTS:CSUAY) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Shenhua Energy and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Shenhua Energy$35.00 billion1.17$6.04 billion$1.216.79
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries$37.18 billion0.28$801.53 million$2.3812.83

China Shenhua Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. China Shenhua Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

China Shenhua Energy has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares China Shenhua Energy and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Shenhua Energy16.55%8.83%6.60%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0.01%0.02%N/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for China Shenhua Energy and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Shenhua Energy0000N/A
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0000N/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of China Shenhua Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Shenhua Energy beats Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) and Vestas Wind Systems A/S (OTCMKTS:VWDRY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of Vestas Wind Systems A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Vestas Wind Systems A/S's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0.01%0.02%N/A
Vestas Wind Systems A/S3.12%13.89%3.16%

Risk & Volatility

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vestas Wind Systems A/S has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Vestas Wind Systems A/S, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0000N/A
Vestas Wind Systems A/S25702.36

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Vestas Wind Systems A/S's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries$37.18 billion0.28$801.53 million$2.3812.83
Vestas Wind Systems A/S$13.61 billion2.98$788.48 million$1.3350.24

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Vestas Wind Systems A/S. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vestas Wind Systems A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Vestas Wind Systems A/S beats Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sands China and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sands China01102.50
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0000N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0.01%0.02%N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sands China and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.94
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries$37.18 billion0.28$801.53 million$2.3812.83

Sands China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sands China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Sands China beats Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compass Group (OTCMKTS:CMPGY) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Compass Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Compass Group38702.22
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0000N/A

Given Compass Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Compass Group is more favorable than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.2% of Compass Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Compass Group has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Compass Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Compass GroupN/AN/AN/A
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0.01%0.02%N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Compass Group and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Group$25.75 billion1.49$169.70 million$0.2489.71
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries$37.18 billion0.28$801.53 million$2.3812.83

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Compass Group. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries beats Compass Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flutter Entertainment (OTCMKTS:PDYPY) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Flutter Entertainment and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flutter Entertainment34402.09
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0000N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.4% of Flutter Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Flutter Entertainment has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Flutter Entertainment and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flutter EntertainmentN/AN/AN/A
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0.01%0.02%N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Flutter Entertainment and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flutter Entertainment$2.73 billion13.60$183.87 million$1.9155.58
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries$37.18 billion0.28$801.53 million$2.3812.83

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Flutter Entertainment. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flutter Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries beats Flutter Entertainment on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sandvik AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:SDVKY) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (OTCMKTS:MHVYF) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Sandvik AB (publ) has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Sandvik AB (publ) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sandvik AB (publ)321102.50
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0000N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of Sandvik AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sandvik AB (publ)$10.92 billion3.29$903.43 million$1.1824.25
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries$37.18 billion0.28$801.53 million$2.3812.83

Sandvik AB (publ) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sandvik AB (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sandvik AB (publ)6.75%19.81%10.54%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries0.01%0.02%N/A

Summary

Sandvik AB (publ) beats Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
China Shenhua Energy logo
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy
1.3$8.21flat$40.82 billion$35.00 billion7.46
Vestas Wind Systems A/S logo
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
1.2$66.82flat$40.49 billion$13.61 billion75.93Analyst Downgrade
Sands China logo
SCHYY
Sands China
0.9$47.53flat$38.46 billion$8.81 billion18.94
Compass Group logo
CMPGY
Compass Group
0.8$21.53flat$38.41 billion$25.75 billion89.71Analyst Upgrade
Flutter Entertainment logo
PDYPY
Flutter Entertainment
0.4$106.15flat$37.17 billion$2.73 billion55.58
Sandvik AB (publ) logo
SDVKY
Sandvik AB (publ)
0.8$28.62flat$35.90 billion$10.92 billion54.00Analyst Report
Kuehne + Nagel International logo
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International
0.9$59.64flat$35.70 billion$21.23 billion44.18
Seven & i logo
SVNDY
Seven & i
1.6$19.78flat$34.99 billion$61.13 billion21.04Gap Down
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) logo
HNNMY
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.7$4.65flat$33.96 billion$24.63 billion155.00Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Japan Tobacco logo
JAPAY
Japan Tobacco
1.2$9.45flat$33.52 billion$19.96 billion12.43
Experian logo
EXPGY
Experian
1.1$36.46flat$33.45 billion$5.18 billion35.75High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Techtronic Industries logo
TTNDY
Techtronic Industries
0.2$89.93flat$32.97 billion$7.67 billion0.00News Coverage
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) logo
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
1.2$15.16flat$31.99 billion$9.95 billion36.98
Amadeus IT Group logo
AMADY
Amadeus IT Group
0.5$70.47flat$31.75 billion$6.25 billion-242.99News Coverage
CK Hutchison logo
CKHUY
CK Hutchison
0.7$8.07flat$31.12 billion$38.34 billion0.00
Swire Pacific logo
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
1.6$7.98flat$31.00 billion$10.93 billion3.18News Coverage
Fujitsu logo
FJTSY
Fujitsu
0.9$30.59flat$31.00 billion$35.49 billion23.17Gap Up
Ashtead Group logo
ASHTY
Ashtead Group
1.2$256.00flat$28.76 billion$5.84 billion35.36News Coverage
Gap Up
Associated British Foods logo
ASBFY
Associated British Foods
0.9$34.11flat$27.00 billion$18.00 billion32.48Analyst Report
News Coverage
Sampo Oyj logo
SAXPY
Sampo Oyj
0.8$24.07flat$26.96 billion$12.62 billion18.80Analyst Report
News Coverage
Zalando logo
ZLNDY
Zalando
0.4$52.13flat$26.61 billion$7.26 billion236.97Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions logo
MGDDY
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
1.5$29.77flat$26.55 billion$27.03 billion13.72Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Wilmar International logo
WLMIY
Wilmar International
0.7$40.85flat$25.80 billion$42.64 billion20.02
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) logo
SNPTF
Sunny Optical Technology (Group)
0.5$22.95flat$25.17 billion$5.48 billion0.00News Coverage
Unicharm logo
UNICY
Unicharm
0.9$8.36flat$24.83 billion$6.55 billion64.31Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
UniCredit logo
UNCFF
UniCredit
1.2$10.62flat$23.79 billion$25.52 billion11.06
Kerry Group logo
KRYAY
Kerry Group
1.2$134.26flat$23.73 billion$8.11 billion30.44News Coverage
BAE Systems logo
BAESY
BAE Systems
1.4$28.57flat$23.00 billion$22.52 billion14.00Dividend Increase
Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
China CITIC Bank logo
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank
0.9$9.38flat$22.95 billion$47.62 billion0.00
SGS logo
SGSOY
SGS
1.3$29.89flat$22.61 billion$6.64 billion33.58
CIADY
China Mengniu Dairy
0.9$56.84flat$22.44 billion$11.44 billion37.39Analyst Upgrade
Shimano logo
SMNNY
Shimano
0.5$24.20flat$22.43 billion$3.33 billion41.84Gap Up
Ocado Group logo
OCDDY
Ocado Group
0.4$59.57flat$22.30 billion$2.26 billion-78.38
Suzuki Motor logo
SZKMY
Suzuki Motor
1.5$176.87flat$21.71 billion$32.03 billion20.98Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
Sysmex logo
SSMXY
Sysmex
0.6$51.10flat$21.40 billion$2.78 billion77.42
Secom logo
SOMLY
Secom
1.3$21.39flat$19.96 billion$9.75 billion26.09
Sino Biopharmaceutical logo
SBMFF
Sino Biopharmaceutical
0.8$1.06flat$19.92 billion$3.51 billion0.00
Eisai logo
ESALY
Eisai
1.3$67.14flat$19.91 billion$6.40 billion17.35Analyst Downgrade
Nomura Research Institute logo
NRILY
Nomura Research Institute
1.1$30.81flat$19.74 billion$4.87 billion36.25
Ferrovial logo
FRRVY
Ferrovial
0.5$26.51flat$19.43 billion$6.78 billion0.00
Eurofins Scientific logo
ERFSF
Eurofins Scientific
0.9$102.00flat$18.16 billion$5.19 billion45.13News Coverage
OMRON logo
OMRNY
OMRON
1.0$84.41flat$17.41 billion$6.24 billion0.00
Deutsche Wohnen logo
DWHHF
Deutsche Wohnen
0.9$48.28flat$17.37 billion$937.88 million14.12
Rakuten logo
RKUNY
Rakuten
0.6$12.06flat$17.33 billion$11.60 billion-19.77News Coverage
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group logo
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
1.2$16.89flat$16.89 billion$7.26 billion45.65
OMV Aktiengesellschaft logo
OMVJF
OMV Aktiengesellschaft
1.0$51.22flat$16.72 billion$26.28 billion-51.74
NN Group logo
NNGRY
NN Group
1.1$25.23flat$16.67 billion$22.92 billion7.84
COSCO SHIPPING logo
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING
0.8$8.15flat$16.65 billion$21.78 billion101.88High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Atlantia logo
ATASY
Atlantia
0.6$9.72flat$16.05 billion$14.13 billion108.00News Coverage
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock logo
SGTZY
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock
0.1$4.40flat$15.72 billion$28.13 billion0.00News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.