Oxford Instruments Competitors

Oxford Instruments (OTCMKTS:OXINF) and Meggitt (OTCMKTS:MEGGY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Meggitt has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Meggitt's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Meggitt has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments.

Profitability

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Meggitt's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Oxford Instruments and Meggitt, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Oxford Instruments (OTCMKTS:OXINF) and Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Onto Innovation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Onto Innovation's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Onto Innovation has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Instruments.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Oxford Instruments and Onto Innovation, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $72.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.90%. Given Onto Innovation's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Onto Innovation is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Onto Innovation beats Oxford Instruments on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oxford Instruments (OTCMKTS:OXINF) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Cubic's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Oxford Instruments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cubic.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Oxford Instruments and Cubic, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.20, suggesting a potential downside of 12.89%. Given Cubic's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cubic is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Oxford Instruments (OTCMKTS:OXINF) and FARO Technologies (NASDAQ:FARO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FARO Technologies has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.1% of FARO Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of FARO Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Oxford Instruments and FARO Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oxford Instruments and FARO Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Oxford Instruments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FARO Technologies.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Oxford Instruments and FARO Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

FARO Technologies has a consensus price target of $117.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.68%. Given FARO Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FARO Technologies is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

MTS Systems (NASDAQ:MTSC) and Oxford Instruments (OTCMKTS:OXINF) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MTS Systems and Oxford Instruments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Oxford Instruments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MTS Systems.

Profitability

This table compares MTS Systems and Oxford Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

MTS Systems has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.7% of MTS Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of MTS Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for MTS Systems and Oxford Instruments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

MTS Systems presently has a consensus target price of $36.50, suggesting a potential downside of 37.60%. Given MTS Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe MTS Systems is more favorable than Oxford Instruments.

Summary

MTS Systems beats Oxford Instruments on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oxford Instruments (OTCMKTS:OXINF) and Geospace Technologies (NASDAQ:GEOS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Oxford Instruments and Geospace Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Risk and Volatility

Oxford Instruments has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Geospace Technologies has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Geospace Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Oxford Instruments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Geospace Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Oxford Instruments and Geospace Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Geospace Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.