Pengrowth Energy Competitors

Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) and SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and SilverBow Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and SilverBow Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SilverBow Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pengrowth Energy.

Risk & Volatility

Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its share price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its share price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Pengrowth Energy and SilverBow Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

SilverBow Resources has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 11.17%. Given SilverBow Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Pengrowth Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SilverBow Resources beats Pengrowth Energy on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) and Amplify Energy (NYSE:AMPY) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its share price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amplify Energy has a beta of 4.31, suggesting that its share price is 331% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and Amplify Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and Amplify Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Amplify Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pengrowth Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.0% of Amplify Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Amplify Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Pengrowth Energy and Amplify Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Amplify Energy has a consensus target price of $2.20, suggesting a potential downside of 14.40%. Given Amplify Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amplify Energy is more favorable than Pengrowth Energy.

Summary

Amplify Energy beats Pengrowth Energy on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) and PrimeEnergy Resources (NASDAQ:PNRG) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Pengrowth Energy and PrimeEnergy Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Volatility & Risk

Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and PrimeEnergy Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

PrimeEnergy Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pengrowth Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and PrimeEnergy Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.5% of PrimeEnergy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.6% of PrimeEnergy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PrimeEnergy Resources beats Pengrowth Energy on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) and Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Epsilon Energy and Pengrowth Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Epsilon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pengrowth Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Epsilon Energy and Pengrowth Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its share price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Epsilon Energy and Pengrowth Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

42.9% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.7% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Epsilon Energy beats Pengrowth Energy on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Obsidian Energy (OTCMKTS:OBELF) and Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Obsidian Energy and Pengrowth Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Pengrowth Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Obsidian Energy.

Risk & Volatility

Obsidian Energy has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its share price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Obsidian Energy and Pengrowth Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Obsidian Energy and Pengrowth Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Pengrowth Energy beats Obsidian Energy on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) and Painted Pony Energy (OTCMKTS:PDPYF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and Painted Pony Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Painted Pony Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pengrowth Energy.

Risk and Volatility

Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Painted Pony Energy has a beta of 3.98, meaning that its stock price is 298% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Pengrowth Energy and Painted Pony Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Painted Pony Energy has a consensus price target of $0.7760, suggesting a potential upside of 49.92%. Given Painted Pony Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Painted Pony Energy is more favorable than Pengrowth Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and Painted Pony Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Painted Pony Energy beats Pengrowth Energy on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.