Royal Standard Minerals Competitors

Amerigo Resources (OTCMKTS:ARREF) and Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Amerigo Resources and Royal Standard Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Amerigo Resources and Royal Standard Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Royal Standard Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amerigo Resources.

Risk and Volatility

Amerigo Resources has a beta of 3.49, meaning that its stock price is 249% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, meaning that its stock price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Amerigo Resources and Royal Standard Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Royal Standard Minerals beats Amerigo Resources on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rubicon Minerals (OTCMKTS:RBYCF) and Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Rubicon Minerals and Royal Standard Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Rubicon Minerals and Royal Standard Minerals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Rubicon Minerals and Royal Standard Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Rubicon Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $3.1667, indicating a potential upside of 45.93%. Given Rubicon Minerals' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Rubicon Minerals is more favorable than Royal Standard Minerals.

Volatility and Risk

Rubicon Minerals has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, suggesting that its share price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Rubicon Minerals beats Royal Standard Minerals on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) and International Tower Hill Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:THM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Royal Standard Minerals and International Tower Hill Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.

International Tower Hill Mines has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 385.44%. Given International Tower Hill Mines' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe International Tower Hill Mines is more favorable than Royal Standard Minerals.

Risk & Volatility

Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, suggesting that its stock price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Tower Hill Mines has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and International Tower Hill Mines' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and International Tower Hill Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

52.8% of International Tower Hill Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of International Tower Hill Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

International Tower Hill Mines beats Royal Standard Minerals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) and Dakota Territory Resource (OTCMKTS:DTRC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Royal Standard Minerals and Dakota Territory Resource, as provided by MarketBeat.

Volatility & Risk

Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, meaning that its stock price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dakota Territory Resource has a beta of -1.64, meaning that its stock price is 264% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Dakota Territory Resource's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Dakota Territory Resource's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Royal Standard Minerals beats Dakota Territory Resource on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:ASM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.3% of Avino Silver & Gold Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, suggesting that its share price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Avino Silver & Gold Mines has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Royal Standard Minerals and Avino Silver & Gold Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines has a consensus price target of $1.70, suggesting a potential upside of 37.65%. Given Avino Silver & Gold Mines' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Avino Silver & Gold Mines is more favorable than Royal Standard Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Avino Silver & Gold Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Avino Silver & Gold Mines' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Royal Standard Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avino Silver & Gold Mines.

Summary

Avino Silver & Gold Mines beats Royal Standard Minerals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Westwater Resources (NASDAQ:WWR) and Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Westwater Resources and Royal Standard Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Westwater Resources has a beta of 1.68, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, indicating that its share price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.7% of Westwater Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Westwater Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Westwater Resources and Royal Standard Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Westwater Resources and Royal Standard Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Westwater Resources beats Royal Standard Minerals on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.