Schaeffler Competitors

Schaeffler (OTCMKTS:SCFLF) and Onex (OTCMKTS:ONEXF) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Schaeffler and Onex's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Onex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schaeffler.

Profitability

This table compares Schaeffler and Onex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Schaeffler has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Onex has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.8% of Onex shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Schaeffler and Onex, as reported by MarketBeat.

Onex has a consensus target price of $95.40, suggesting a potential upside of 33.41%. Given Onex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Onex is more favorable than Schaeffler.

Summary

Onex beats Schaeffler on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schaeffler (OTCMKTS:SCFLF) and Grupo Financiero Inbursa (OTCMKTS:GPFOY) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schaeffler and Grupo Financiero Inbursa's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Schaeffler has higher revenue and earnings than Grupo Financiero Inbursa.

Profitability

This table compares Schaeffler and Grupo Financiero Inbursa's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Schaeffler has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grupo Financiero Inbursa has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Schaeffler and Grupo Financiero Inbursa, as reported by MarketBeat.

Schaeffler (OTCMKTS:SCFLF) and H. Lundbeck A/S (OTCMKTS:HLUYY) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schaeffler and H. Lundbeck A/S's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Schaeffler has higher revenue and earnings than H. Lundbeck A/S. Schaeffler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H. Lundbeck A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Schaeffler and H. Lundbeck A/S's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Schaeffler has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, H. Lundbeck A/S has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of H. Lundbeck A/S shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Schaeffler and H. Lundbeck A/S, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

H. Lundbeck A/S beats Schaeffler on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schaeffler (OTCMKTS:SCFLF) and Renishaw (OTCMKTS:RNSHF) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schaeffler and Renishaw's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Schaeffler has higher revenue and earnings than Renishaw. Schaeffler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renishaw, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Schaeffler and Renishaw's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Schaeffler has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Renishaw has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Renishaw shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Schaeffler and Renishaw, as reported by MarketBeat.

Schaeffler (OTCMKTS:SCFLF) and DS Smith (OTCMKTS:DITHF) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schaeffler and DS Smith's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

DS Smith has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schaeffler. Schaeffler is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DS Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Schaeffler and DS Smith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Schaeffler and DS Smith, as reported by MarketBeat.

Risk & Volatility

Schaeffler has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DS Smith has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of DS Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

DS Smith beats Schaeffler on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tosoh (OTCMKTS:TOSCF) and Schaeffler (OTCMKTS:SCFLF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tosoh and Schaeffler's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Tosoh has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schaeffler.

Profitability

This table compares Tosoh and Schaeffler's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Tosoh and Schaeffler, as provided by MarketBeat.

Risk and Volatility

Tosoh has a beta of -0.09, meaning that its share price is 109% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schaeffler has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Tosoh beats Schaeffler on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.