S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
Log in
OTCMKTS:SCIA

SCI Engineered Materials Competitors

$3.49
+0.49 (+16.33 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.91
Now: $3.49
$3.49
50-Day Range
$1.72
MA: $2.52
$3.50
52-Week Range
$0.70
Now: $3.49
$4.00
Volume2,307 shs
Average Volume5,807 shs
Market Capitalization$15.59 million
P/E Ratio349.35
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.29

Competitors

SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) Vs. PLUG, WWD, BLDP, BE, EAF, and ITMPF

Should you be buying SCIA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "electrical industrial apparatus" are considered alternatives and competitors to SCI Engineered Materials, including Plug Power (PLUG), Woodward (WWD), Ballard Power Systems (BLDP), Bloom Energy (BE), GrafTech International (EAF), and ITM Power (ITMPF).

Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) and SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Plug Power and SCI Engineered Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Plug Power-33.75%-37.12%-10.09%
SCI Engineered Materials0.79%2.28%1.23%

Risk and Volatility

Plug Power has a beta of 1.81, indicating that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SCI Engineered Materials has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

50.9% of Plug Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Plug Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Plug Power and SCI Engineered Materials' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plug Power$230.24 million80.10$-85,460,000.00($0.34)-115.59
SCI Engineered Materials$12.95 million1.20$310,000.00N/AN/A

SCI Engineered Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plug Power.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Plug Power and SCI Engineered Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Plug Power111202.79
SCI Engineered Materials0000N/A

Plug Power currently has a consensus price target of $52.6923, indicating a potential upside of 34.08%. Given Plug Power's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Plug Power is more favorable than SCI Engineered Materials.

SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) and Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares SCI Engineered Materials and Woodward's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SCI Engineered Materials0.79%2.28%1.23%
Woodward9.25%15.51%7.15%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SCI Engineered Materials and Woodward's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SCI Engineered Materials$12.95 million1.20$310,000.00N/AN/A
Woodward$2.90 billion2.50$259.60 million$4.8823.61

Woodward has higher revenue and earnings than SCI Engineered Materials.

Risk and Volatility

SCI Engineered Materials has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Woodward has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for SCI Engineered Materials and Woodward, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SCI Engineered Materials0000N/A
Woodward16302.20

Woodward has a consensus price target of $103.5714, indicating a potential downside of 10.12%. Given Woodward's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Woodward is more favorable than SCI Engineered Materials.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.5% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.0% of Woodward shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Woodward shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Woodward beats SCI Engineered Materials on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ballard Power Systems (NASDAQ:BLDP) and SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Ballard Power Systems has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SCI Engineered Materials has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ballard Power Systems and SCI Engineered Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ballard Power Systems04612.73
SCI Engineered Materials0000N/A

Ballard Power Systems currently has a consensus target price of $31.9091, indicating a potential upside of 42.58%. Given Ballard Power Systems' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ballard Power Systems is more favorable than SCI Engineered Materials.

Profitability

This table compares Ballard Power Systems and SCI Engineered Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ballard Power Systems-40.04%-14.00%-11.27%
SCI Engineered Materials0.79%2.28%1.23%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

18.4% of Ballard Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ballard Power Systems and SCI Engineered Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ballard Power Systems$106.30 million62.54$-39,050,000.00($0.16)-139.88
SCI Engineered Materials$12.95 million1.20$310,000.00N/AN/A

SCI Engineered Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ballard Power Systems.

Summary

Ballard Power Systems beats SCI Engineered Materials on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) and Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SCI Engineered Materials and Bloom Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SCI Engineered Materials$12.95 million1.20$310,000.00N/AN/A
Bloom Energy$786.19 million5.41$-304,410,000.00($2.01)-12.74

SCI Engineered Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bloom Energy.

Profitability

This table compares SCI Engineered Materials and Bloom Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SCI Engineered Materials0.79%2.28%1.23%
Bloom Energy-25.71%N/A-12.52%

Risk and Volatility

SCI Engineered Materials has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.77, meaning that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for SCI Engineered Materials and Bloom Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SCI Engineered Materials0000N/A
Bloom Energy07102.13

Bloom Energy has a consensus target price of $29.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.24%. Given Bloom Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bloom Energy is more favorable than SCI Engineered Materials.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.5% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.6% of Bloom Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.8% of Bloom Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bloom Energy beats SCI Engineered Materials on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for GrafTech International and SCI Engineered Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GrafTech International01202.67
SCI Engineered Materials0000N/A

GrafTech International presently has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.26%. Given GrafTech International's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe GrafTech International is more favorable than SCI Engineered Materials.

Risk and Volatility

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SCI Engineered Materials has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares GrafTech International and SCI Engineered Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GrafTech International37.22%-80.09%31.95%
SCI Engineered Materials0.79%2.28%1.23%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares GrafTech International and SCI Engineered Materials' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GrafTech International$1.79 billion1.71$744.60 million$2.584.45
SCI Engineered Materials$12.95 million1.20$310,000.00N/AN/A

GrafTech International has higher revenue and earnings than SCI Engineered Materials.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.4% of GrafTech International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of GrafTech International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

GrafTech International beats SCI Engineered Materials on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

SCI Engineered Materials (OTCMKTS:SCIA) and ITM Power (OTCMKTS:ITMPF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for SCI Engineered Materials and ITM Power, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SCI Engineered Materials0000N/A
ITM Power01402.80

Volatility & Risk

SCI Engineered Materials has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ITM Power has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SCI Engineered Materials and ITM Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SCI Engineered Materials0.79%2.28%1.23%
ITM PowerN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SCI Engineered Materials and ITM Power's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SCI Engineered Materials$12.95 million1.20$310,000.00N/AN/A
ITM Power$5.99 million340.78$-12,330,000.00N/AN/A

SCI Engineered Materials has higher revenue and earnings than ITM Power.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.5% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of SCI Engineered Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SCI Engineered Materials beats ITM Power on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


SCI Engineered Materials Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Plug Power logo
PLUG
Plug Power
1.8$39.30+1.8%$18.44 billion$230.24 million-119.09Analyst Downgrade
Gap Down
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.6$115.23+0.3%$7.26 billion$2.90 billion29.70Insider Selling
Gap Down
Ballard Power Systems logo
BLDP
Ballard Power Systems
1.5$22.38+5.4%$6.65 billion$106.30 million-111.90Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Bloom Energy logo
BE
Bloom Energy
1.4$25.61+3.9%$4.26 billion$786.19 million-15.91Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
GrafTech International logo
EAF
GrafTech International
1.9$11.49+0.1%$3.07 billion$1.79 billion6.53High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
ITM Power logo
ITMPF
ITM Power
0.8$6.30+0.3%$2.04 billion$5.99 million0.00Analyst Report
Hollysys Automation Technologies logo
HOLI
Hollysys Automation Technologies
2.3$14.34+6.2%$868.10 million$503.33 million12.36Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Thermon Group logo
THR
Thermon Group
1.3$21.45+5.6%$712.08 million$383.49 million-2,142.86Gap Up
Ideal Power logo
IPWR
Ideal Power
1.1$15.84+4.2%$68.32 millionN/A-7.07News Coverage
Gap Up
CHGI
China Carbon Graphite Group
0.6$0.22+4.5%$6.15 million$360,000.000.00Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Up
CPQQ
China Power Equipment
0.0$0.04+0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.