Shanghai Industrial Competitors

Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) and Colliers International Group (NASDAQ:CIGI) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Colliers International Group has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Colliers International Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Colliers International Group.

Dividends

Shanghai Industrial pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Colliers International Group pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Colliers International Group pays out 3.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Colliers International Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

69.8% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.3% of Colliers International Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Shanghai Industrial and Colliers International Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Colliers International Group has a consensus price target of $115.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.99%. Given Colliers International Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Colliers International Group is more favorable than Shanghai Industrial.

Profitability

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Colliers International Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Colliers International Group beats Shanghai Industrial on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) and Innovative Industrial Properties (NYSE:IIPR) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Innovative Industrial Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Innovative Industrial Properties' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Innovative Industrial Properties.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Innovative Industrial Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Shanghai Industrial pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays an annual dividend of $5.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 161.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Innovative Industrial Properties has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Shanghai Industrial and Innovative Industrial Properties, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus price target of $192.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 4.17%. Given Innovative Industrial Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more favorable than Shanghai Industrial.

Summary

Innovative Industrial Properties beats Shanghai Industrial on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) and Terreno Realty (NYSE:TRNO) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Terreno Realty has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Terreno Realty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Terreno Realty's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Terreno Realty.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Terreno Realty shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Terreno Realty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Shanghai Industrial pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Terreno Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Terreno Realty pays out 84.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Terreno Realty has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Shanghai Industrial and Terreno Realty, as provided by MarketBeat.

Terreno Realty has a consensus price target of $66.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.87%. Given Terreno Realty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Terreno Realty is more favorable than Shanghai Industrial.

Summary

Terreno Realty beats Shanghai Industrial on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) and Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE:HPP) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Hudson Pacific Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Hudson Pacific Properties' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Pacific Properties.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.1% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Shanghai Industrial pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Hudson Pacific Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Hudson Pacific Properties pays out 49.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hudson Pacific Properties has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hudson Pacific Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Shanghai Industrial and Hudson Pacific Properties, as provided by MarketBeat.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $27.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 1.65%. Given Hudson Pacific Properties' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more favorable than Shanghai Industrial.

Summary

Hudson Pacific Properties beats Shanghai Industrial on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) and Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE:CWK) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

72.2% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cushman & Wakefield has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Shanghai Industrial and Cushman & Wakefield, as provided by MarketBeat.

Cushman & Wakefield has a consensus price target of $16.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 10.03%. Given Cushman & Wakefield's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cushman & Wakefield is more favorable than Shanghai Industrial.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Cushman & Wakefield's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cushman & Wakefield.

Profitability

This table compares Shanghai Industrial and Cushman & Wakefield's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cushman & Wakefield beats Shanghai Industrial on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

New World Development (OTCMKTS:NDVLY) and Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Dividends

New World Development pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Shanghai Industrial pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares New World Development and Shanghai Industrial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New World Development.

Volatility & Risk

New World Development has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for New World Development and Shanghai Industrial, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares New World Development and Shanghai Industrial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of New World Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

New World Development beats Shanghai Industrial on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.