Schroders Competitors

Pjsc Lukoil (OTCMKTS:LUKOY) and Schroders (OTCMKTS:SHNWF) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Pjsc Lukoil has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Pjsc Lukoil and Schroders' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Pjsc Lukoil and Schroders, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Pjsc Lukoil currently has a consensus target price of $80.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.87%. Given Pjsc Lukoil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Pjsc Lukoil is more favorable than Schroders.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pjsc Lukoil and Schroders' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pjsc Lukoil has higher revenue and earnings than Schroders.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.6% of Pjsc Lukoil shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pjsc Lukoil beats Schroders on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schroders (OTCMKTS:SHNWF) and DENSO (OTCMKTS:DNZOY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schroders and DENSO's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Schroders has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DENSO. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DENSO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of DENSO shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Schroders and DENSO, as provided by MarketBeat.

Volatility & Risk

Schroders has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DENSO has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Schroders and DENSO's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Schroders beats DENSO on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schroders (OTCMKTS:SHNWF) and Oriental Land (OTCMKTS:OLCLY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Schroders and Oriental Land's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Schroders and Oriental Land, as reported by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Schroders and Oriental Land's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Schroders has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oriental Land. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oriental Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Schroders has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oriental Land has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Schroders beats Oriental Land on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jardine Matheson (OTCMKTS:JMHLY) and Schroders (OTCMKTS:SHNWF) are both large-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Jardine Matheson and Schroders, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Jardine Matheson and Schroders' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Jardine Matheson has higher revenue and earnings than Schroders.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of Jardine Matheson shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Jardine Matheson has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Jardine Matheson and Schroders' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Jardine Matheson beats Schroders on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

ITOCHU (OTCMKTS:ITOCY) and Schroders (OTCMKTS:SHNWF) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares ITOCHU and Schroders' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

ITOCHU has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.2% of ITOCHU shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ITOCHU and Schroders' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ITOCHU has higher revenue and earnings than Schroders. ITOCHU is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ITOCHU and Schroders, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

ITOCHU beats Schroders on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

HOYA (OTCMKTS:HOCPY) and Schroders (OTCMKTS:SHNWF) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of HOYA shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

HOYA has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for HOYA and Schroders, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares HOYA and Schroders' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

HOYA has higher revenue and earnings than Schroders. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HOYA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares HOYA and Schroders' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

HOYA beats Schroders on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.