OTCMKTS:SUIC

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated Competitors

$6.50

+0.50 (+8.34 %)

(As of 04/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$6.00

Now: $6.50▼

$6.60

50-Day Range

$2.27

MA: $3.90▼

$6.00

52-Week Range

$0.22

Now: $6.50▼

$7.00

Volume78,176 shs

Average Volume44,694 shs

Market Capitalization$217.58 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.06

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) Vs. WNDW, AMTX, FF, REX, PEIX, and GPP

Should you be buying SUIC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "industrial organic chemicals" are considered alternatives and competitors to Sino United Worldwide Consolidated, including SolarWindow Technologies (WNDW), Aemetis (AMTX), FutureFuel (FF), REX American Resources (REX), Alto Ingredients (PEIX), and Green Plains Partners (GPP).

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated vs. SolarWindow Technologies Stock

SolarWindow Technologies (OTCMKTS:WNDW) and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SolarWindow Technologies and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SolarWindow Technologies	0	0	0	0	N/A
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	0	0	0	0	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SolarWindow Technologies and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SolarWindow Technologies	N/A	N/A	$-6,890,000.00	N/A	N/A
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	$100,000.00	2,175.83	$-10,000.00	N/A	N/A

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has higher revenue and earnings than SolarWindow Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares SolarWindow Technologies and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SolarWindow Technologies	N/A	-37.72%	-37.13%
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	-36.33%	N/A	-15.87%

Volatility & Risk

SolarWindow Technologies has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its share price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has a beta of 0.06, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated beats SolarWindow Technologies on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated vs. Aemetis Stock

Aemetis (NASDAQ:AMTX) and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.9% of Aemetis shares are held by institutional investors. 28.3% of Aemetis shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Aemetis and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aemetis	0	0	7	0	3.00
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	0	0	0	0	N/A

Aemetis currently has a consensus target price of $31.60, indicating a potential upside of 41.07%. Given Aemetis' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Aemetis is more favorable than Sino United Worldwide Consolidated.

Volatility & Risk

Aemetis has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has a beta of 0.06, suggesting that its share price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Aemetis and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aemetis	$202 million	3.01	$-35,720,000.00	($1.75)	-12.80
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	$100,000.00	2,175.83	$-10,000.00	N/A	N/A

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aemetis.

Profitability

This table compares Aemetis and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aemetis	-15.97%	N/A	-25.71%
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	-36.33%	N/A	-15.87%

Summary

Aemetis beats Sino United Worldwide Consolidated on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated vs. FutureFuel Stock

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) and FutureFuel (NYSE:FF) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and FutureFuel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	$100,000.00	2,175.83	$-10,000.00	N/A	N/A
FutureFuel	$205.23 million	2.92	$88.18 million	N/A	N/A

FutureFuel has higher revenue and earnings than Sino United Worldwide Consolidated.

Profitability

This table compares Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and FutureFuel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	-36.33%	N/A	-15.87%
FutureFuel	64.90%	26.01%	19.55%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

52.4% of FutureFuel shares are held by institutional investors. 41.4% of FutureFuel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FutureFuel has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and FutureFuel, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	0	0	0	0	N/A
FutureFuel	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

FutureFuel beats Sino United Worldwide Consolidated on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated vs. REX American Resources Stock

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) and REX American Resources (NYSE:REX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and REX American Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	$100,000.00	2,175.83	$-10,000.00	N/A	N/A
REX American Resources	$418.03 million	1.23	$7.43 million	$1.18	72.64

REX American Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Sino United Worldwide Consolidated.

Profitability

This table compares Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and REX American Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	-36.33%	N/A	-15.87%
REX American Resources	1.05%	0.87%	0.80%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.8% of REX American Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.4% of REX American Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, REX American Resources has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and REX American Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	0	0	0	0	N/A
REX American Resources	0	0	1	0	3.00

Summary

REX American Resources beats Sino United Worldwide Consolidated on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated vs. Alto Ingredients Stock

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) and Alto Ingredients (NASDAQ:PEIX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.5% of Alto Ingredients shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Alto Ingredients shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and Alto Ingredients' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	$100,000.00	2,175.83	$-10,000.00	N/A	N/A
Alto Ingredients	$1.42 billion	0.24	$-88,950,000.00	($1.40)	-3.59

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alto Ingredients.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and Alto Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	0	0	0	0	N/A
Alto Ingredients	0	0	3	0	3.00

Alto Ingredients has a consensus price target of $15.1250, indicating a potential upside of 200.70%. Given Alto Ingredients' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alto Ingredients is more favorable than Sino United Worldwide Consolidated.

Profitability

This table compares Sino United Worldwide Consolidated and Alto Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	-36.33%	N/A	-15.87%
Alto Ingredients	-3.32%	-2.90%	-1.18%

Volatility & Risk

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alto Ingredients has a beta of 3.35, meaning that its stock price is 235% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Alto Ingredients beats Sino United Worldwide Consolidated on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino United Worldwide Consolidated vs. Green Plains Partners Stock

Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated (OTCMKTS:SUIC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains Partners	$82.39 million	3.44	$41.48 million	$1.76	6.94
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	$100,000.00	2,175.83	$-10,000.00	N/A	N/A

Green Plains Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Sino United Worldwide Consolidated.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Green Plains Partners and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Green Plains Partners	0	0	0	1	4.00
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	0	0	0	0	N/A

Green Plains Partners presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Green Plains Partners' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Sino United Worldwide Consolidated.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains Partners and Sino United Worldwide Consolidated's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Green Plains Partners	49.83%	-57.99%	38.97%
Sino United Worldwide Consolidated	-36.33%	N/A	-15.87%

Volatility & Risk

Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino United Worldwide Consolidated has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Green Plains Partners beats Sino United Worldwide Consolidated on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.