OTCMKTS:WINMQWindstream Competitors & Alternatives

Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) and Windstream (OTCMKTS:WINMQ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Verizon Communications and Windstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Windstream has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

65.5% of Verizon Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Verizon Communications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Windstream shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Verizon Communications and Windstream's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Verizon Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Windstream.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Verizon Communications and Windstream, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Verizon Communications currently has a consensus price target of $61.6111, indicating a potential upside of 13.07%. Given Verizon Communications' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Verizon Communications is more favorable than Windstream.

Summary

Verizon Communications beats Windstream on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

AT&T (NYSE:T) and Windstream (OTCMKTS:WINMQ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

AT&T has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Windstream has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for AT&T and Windstream, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

AT&T currently has a consensus price target of $36.0625, indicating a potential upside of 19.69%. Given AT&T's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe AT&T is more favorable than Windstream.

Profitability

This table compares AT&T and Windstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AT&T and Windstream's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AT&T has higher revenue and earnings than Windstream.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.8% of AT&T shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of AT&T shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Windstream shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

AT&T beats Windstream on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Windstream (OTCMKTS:WINMQ) and China Mobile (NYSE:CHL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Windstream has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Mobile has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Windstream and China Mobile, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Windstream and China Mobile's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Windstream and China Mobile's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Mobile has higher revenue and earnings than Windstream.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

2.2% of China Mobile shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Windstream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Mobile beats Windstream on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Windstream (OTCMKTS:WINMQ) and SoftBank Group (OTCMKTS:SFTBY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Windstream has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SoftBank Group has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Windstream and SoftBank Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

SoftBank Group has a consensus target price of $20.90, indicating a potential downside of 29.25%. Given SoftBank Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SoftBank Group is more favorable than Windstream.

Profitability

This table compares Windstream and SoftBank Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Windstream and SoftBank Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Windstream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SoftBank Group.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.2% of SoftBank Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Windstream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SoftBank Group beats Windstream on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Windstream (OTCMKTS:WINMQ) and Nippon Telegraph & Telephone (OTCMKTS:NTTYY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Windstream has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Windstream and Nippon Telegraph & Telephone, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Windstream and Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Windstream and Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher revenue and earnings than Windstream.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.2% of Nippon Telegraph & Telephone shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Windstream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone beats Windstream on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Windstream (OTCMKTS:WINMQ) and America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L (NYSE:AMX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Windstream has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

7.2% of America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Windstream shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Windstream and America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Windstream and America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L, as reported by MarketBeat.

America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential downside of 27.48%. Given America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L is more favorable than Windstream.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Windstream and America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L has higher revenue and earnings than Windstream.

Summary

America Movil SAB de CV ADR Series L beats Windstream on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.