TSE:TRQ

Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors

C$20.19

+0.20 (+1.00 %)

(As of 05/17/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

C$19.70

▼

C$20.62

50-Day Range

C$19.99

▼

C$25.65

52-Week Range

C$8.00

▼

C$26.45

Volume318,113 shs

Average Volume377,923 shs

Market CapitalizationC$4.06 billion

P/E Ratio5.61

Dividend YieldN/A

BetaN/A

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) Vs. LUN, KAT, HBM, CS, ERO, and NSU

Should you be buying TRQ stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "copper" are considered alternatives and competitors to Turquoise Hill Resources, including Lundin Mining (LUN), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Capstone Mining (CS), Ero Copper (ERO), and Nevsun Resources (NSU).

Turquoise Hill Resources vs. Lundin Mining Stock

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Lundin Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Lundin Mining	N/A	N/A	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Lundin Mining's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.47 billion	2.76	C$724.83 million	C$3.60	5.61
Lundin Mining	C$2.34 billion	4.28	C$503.56 million	C$0.68	19.93

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lundin Mining. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lundin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Turquoise Hill Resources and Lundin Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources	0	4	1	0	2.20
Lundin Mining	1	9	4	1	2.33

Turquoise Hill Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$1.64, suggesting a potential downside of 91.90%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$15.49, suggesting a potential upside of 13.96%. Given Lundin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lundin Mining is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources vs. Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Stock

Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) and Turquoise Hill Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	C$1.39 billion	7.06	C$-11,750,390,784.00	C($0.19)	-0.83
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.47 billion	2.76	C$724.83 million	C$3.60	5.61

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)	0	0	0	0	N/A
Turquoise Hill Resources	0	4	1	0	2.20

Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus price target of C$1.64, suggesting a potential downside of 91.90%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources vs. Hudbay Minerals Stock

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Hudbay Minerals and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals	0	1	11	1	3.00
Turquoise Hill Resources	0	4	1	0	2.20

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$12.91, indicating a potential upside of 29.85%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of C$1.64, indicating a potential downside of 91.90%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hudbay Minerals and Turquoise Hill Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay Minerals	C$1.16 billion	2.24	C$-156,590,580.00	C($0.60)	-16.59
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.47 billion	2.76	C$724.83 million	C$3.60	5.61

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Hudbay Minerals. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Hudbay Minerals and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Hudbay Minerals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources vs. Capstone Mining Stock

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) and Capstone Mining (TSE:CS) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Turquoise Hill Resources and Capstone Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources	0	4	1	0	2.20
Capstone Mining	0	0	7	0	3.00

Turquoise Hill Resources currently has a consensus target price of C$1.64, indicating a potential downside of 91.90%. Capstone Mining has a consensus target price of C$5.74, indicating a potential downside of 5.45%. Given Capstone Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Mining is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Capstone Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Capstone Mining	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Capstone Mining's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.47 billion	2.76	C$724.83 million	C$3.60	5.61
Capstone Mining	C$587.47 million	4.24	C$165.65 million	C$0.40	15.02

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Mining. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Capstone Mining beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources vs. Ero Copper Stock

Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) and Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Ero Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ero Copper	0	5	3	1	2.56
Turquoise Hill Resources	0	4	1	0	2.20

Ero Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$26.65, indicating a potential downside of 7.18%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus price target of C$1.64, indicating a potential downside of 91.90%. Given Ero Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ero Copper is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Ero Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ero Copper	N/A	N/A	N/A
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ero Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ero Copper	C$378.87 million	6.46	C$149.76 million	C$1.76	16.33
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.47 billion	2.76	C$724.83 million	C$3.60	5.61

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Ero Copper. Turquoise Hill Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ero Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ero Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources vs. Nevsun Resources Stock

Turquoise Hill Resources (TSE:TRQ) and Nevsun Resources (TSE:NSU) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Turquoise Hill Resources and Nevsun Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources	0	4	1	0	2.20
Nevsun Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

Turquoise Hill Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$1.64, suggesting a potential downside of 91.90%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Nevsun Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Nevsun Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources	C$1.47 billion	2.76	C$724.83 million	C$3.60	5.61
Nevsun Resources	C$335.39 million	5.41	C$-36,311,160.00	C($0.12)	-50.00

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Nevsun Resources. Nevsun Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turquoise Hill Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Nevsun Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nevsun Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Nevsun Resources on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.