S&P 500   3,925.43 (+1.14%)
DOW   31,961.86 (+1.35%)
QQQ   324.18 (+0.84%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
S&P 500   3,925.43 (+1.14%)
DOW   31,961.86 (+1.35%)
QQQ   324.18 (+0.84%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
S&P 500   3,925.43 (+1.14%)
DOW   31,961.86 (+1.35%)
QQQ   324.18 (+0.84%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
S&P 500   3,925.43 (+1.14%)
DOW   31,961.86 (+1.35%)
QQQ   324.18 (+0.84%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
Log in

Regulator says Australia must address Google ad dominance

Wednesday, January 27, 2021 | Rod Mcguirk, Associated Press


In this Monday, Nov. 5, 2018 file photo, a woman walks past the logo for Google at the China International Import Expo in Shanghai. Google says it's making progress on plans to revamp Chrome user tracking technology aimed at improving privacy even as it faces challenges from regulators and officials. The company gave an update Monday, Jan. 25, 2021 on its work to remove from its Chrome browser so-called third-party cookies, which are used by a website's advertisers or partners and can be used to track user browsing habits across the internet. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — A lack of competition for Google and a lack of transparency in the digital advertising supply chain needed to be addressed because they were impacting publishers, advertisers and consumers, Australia’s competition watchdog said on Thursday.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission released its interim report on its inquiry into the Google-dominated digital advertising services industry in Australia that is worth 3.4 billion Australian dollars ($2.6 billion) a year.

The industry allows advertisers to buy access to consumers’ eyeballs almost instantaneously through an automated bidding process, flashing up products that supposedly align with the individual consumers’ personal interests. Such individually tailored ads can follow consumers around the internet.

Google not only powers the digital display technology, it also controls much of the advertising space.

Commission Chair Rod Sims said “there is a real lack of competition, choice and transparency in this industry” that add to advertisers’ costs and increase prices paid by consumers.

“Google’s significant presence across the whole ad tech supply chain, combined with its significant data advantage, means Google is likely to have the ability and the incentive to preference its own ad tech businesses in ways that affect competition,” Sims wrote.

He said that during the inquiry, parties expressed concern about potential conflicts of interest from Google’s various roles in this industry. "This includes Google very often acting on behalf of both publishers and advertisers for the same ad sale across the ad tech supply chain, while also selling its own ad inventory,” Sims added.

The commission had yet to form a view on whether Google's conduct breached Australian competition law through a misuse of market power, the report said.

A lawsuit announced last month from several U.S. states alleges Google engaged in “anti-competitive conduct” in online advertising and used its “monopolistic power” to control the prices and eliminate competition. Google is calling the suit “meritless” and says the price of online advertising has fallen over the last decade.

According to filing records, Texas is suing along with Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota and Utah.

Sims suggested Australia create rules to manage conflicts of interest and to prevent Google from potentially preferring its own businesses.

The commission noted that competition regulators in Britain and the European Union had raised similar issues.

The commission also suggested mandatory breaking up of datasets held by large incumbents so that rival ad tech providers could more easily compete.

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, who called for the investigation, said the government needed to ensure that regulatory frameworks “keep pace with the changes being driven by digital platforms.”

"While this is an interim report, the government notes the ACCC’s concerns over competitiveness and the continued dominance of tech giants,” Frydenberg said in a statement.

“The government looks forward to receiving the final report later this year as we continue delivering reforms to better protect and inform Australian consumers and businesses in the digital age," he added.

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.

Google has been battling the Australian competition watchdog on several fronts in recent years.

Google last week threatened to make its search engine unavailable if the government went ahead with plans to make it and Facebook pay for Australian news content.

The government has drafted legislation based on the watchdog’s media code to force the U.S. tech giants pay Australian news businesses fair compensation for their content.

The commission has also sued Google, alleging the platform broke consumer law by misleading Android users about how their location data was collected and used. Google has denied the allegation.

The commission will make its final report to the government of its digital advertising services inquiry on Aug. 31.

Companies Mentioned in This Article

CompanyMarketRank™Current PricePrice ChangeDividend YieldP/E RatioConsensus RatingConsensus Price Target
Alphabet (GOOGL)1.8$2,084.24+1.2%N/A40.28Buy$2,069.48
Compare These Stocks  Add These Stocks to My Watchlist 


20 "Past Their Prime" Stocks to Dump From Your Portfolio

Did you know the S&P 500 as we know it today does not look anything close to what it looked like 30 years ago? In 1987, IBM, Exxon, GE, Shell, AT&T, Merck, Du Pont, Philip Morris, Ford, and GM had the largest market caps on the S&P 500. ExxonMobil is the only company on that list to remain in the top 10 in 2017. Even 15 years ago, companies like Radio Shack, AOL, Yahoo, and Blockbuster were an important part of the S&P 500. Now, these companies no longer exist as public companies.

As the years go by, some companies lose their luster, and others rise to the top of the markets. We've already seen this in the last few decades, with tech companies surpassing industrial and energy companies that once dominated the S&P 500. It's hard to know what the next mega-trend will be that will knock Apple, Google, and Amazon off the top rankings of the S&P 500, but we know that companies won't stay on the S&P 500 forever.

We've identified 20 companies that are past their prime. They aren't at risk of a near-term delisting from the S&P 500, but they show negative earnings growth for the next several years. If you own any of these stocks, consider selling them now before they become the next Yahoo, Radio Shack, Blockbuster, AOL and are sold off for a fraction of their former value.

View the "20 "Past Their Prime" Stocks to Dump From Your Portfolio".

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.