S&P 500   4,140.06 (-0.12%)
DOW   32,832.54 (+0.09%)
QQQ   321.01 (-0.23%)
AAPL   164.93 (-0.25%)
MSFT   280.53 (-0.84%)
META   170.47 (+2.01%)
GOOGL   117.41 (-0.05%)
AMZN   139.52 (-0.91%)
TSLA   871.20 (+0.77%)
NVDA   178.15 (-6.18%)
NIO   20.18 (-0.20%)
BABA   90.95 (-1.74%)
AMD   100.06 (-2.20%)
MU   61.45 (-1.62%)
T   18.00 (-1.91%)
CGC   3.28 (+21.48%)
GE   75.19 (+1.12%)
F   15.78 (+3.14%)
DIS   109.09 (+2.31%)
AMC   24.06 (+8.48%)
PYPL   96.26 (+0.99%)
PFE   49.33 (+0.12%)
NFLX   233.37 (+2.91%)
S&P 500   4,140.06 (-0.12%)
DOW   32,832.54 (+0.09%)
QQQ   321.01 (-0.23%)
AAPL   164.93 (-0.25%)
MSFT   280.53 (-0.84%)
META   170.47 (+2.01%)
GOOGL   117.41 (-0.05%)
AMZN   139.52 (-0.91%)
TSLA   871.20 (+0.77%)
NVDA   178.15 (-6.18%)
NIO   20.18 (-0.20%)
BABA   90.95 (-1.74%)
AMD   100.06 (-2.20%)
MU   61.45 (-1.62%)
T   18.00 (-1.91%)
CGC   3.28 (+21.48%)
GE   75.19 (+1.12%)
F   15.78 (+3.14%)
DIS   109.09 (+2.31%)
AMC   24.06 (+8.48%)
PYPL   96.26 (+0.99%)
PFE   49.33 (+0.12%)
NFLX   233.37 (+2.91%)
S&P 500   4,140.06 (-0.12%)
DOW   32,832.54 (+0.09%)
QQQ   321.01 (-0.23%)
AAPL   164.93 (-0.25%)
MSFT   280.53 (-0.84%)
META   170.47 (+2.01%)
GOOGL   117.41 (-0.05%)
AMZN   139.52 (-0.91%)
TSLA   871.20 (+0.77%)
NVDA   178.15 (-6.18%)
NIO   20.18 (-0.20%)
BABA   90.95 (-1.74%)
AMD   100.06 (-2.20%)
MU   61.45 (-1.62%)
T   18.00 (-1.91%)
CGC   3.28 (+21.48%)
GE   75.19 (+1.12%)
F   15.78 (+3.14%)
DIS   109.09 (+2.31%)
AMC   24.06 (+8.48%)
PYPL   96.26 (+0.99%)
PFE   49.33 (+0.12%)
NFLX   233.37 (+2.91%)
S&P 500   4,140.06 (-0.12%)
DOW   32,832.54 (+0.09%)
QQQ   321.01 (-0.23%)
AAPL   164.93 (-0.25%)
MSFT   280.53 (-0.84%)
META   170.47 (+2.01%)
GOOGL   117.41 (-0.05%)
AMZN   139.52 (-0.91%)
TSLA   871.20 (+0.77%)
NVDA   178.15 (-6.18%)
NIO   20.18 (-0.20%)
BABA   90.95 (-1.74%)
AMD   100.06 (-2.20%)
MU   61.45 (-1.62%)
T   18.00 (-1.91%)
CGC   3.28 (+21.48%)
GE   75.19 (+1.12%)
F   15.78 (+3.14%)
DIS   109.09 (+2.31%)
AMC   24.06 (+8.48%)
PYPL   96.26 (+0.99%)
PFE   49.33 (+0.12%)
NFLX   233.37 (+2.91%)

Ruling could dampen government efforts to rein in Big Tech


Lina Khan, nominee for Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, speaks during a Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 21, 2021. The Supreme Court’s latest climate change ruling could dampen efforts by federal agencies to rein in the tech industry, which went largely unregulated for decades as the government tried to catch up to changes wrought by the internet. Under Chair Khan, the FTC also has widened the door to more actively writing new regulations in what critics say is a broader interpretation of the agency’s legal authority. (Graeme Jennings/Washington Examiner via AP, Pool, File)

The Supreme Court’s latest climate change ruling could dampen efforts by federal agencies to rein in the tech industry, which went largely unregulated for decades as the government tried to catch up to changes wrought by the internet.

In the 6-3 decision that was narrowly tailored to the Environmental Protection Agency, the court ruled Thursday that the EPA does not have broad authority to reduce power plant emissions that contribute to global warming. The precedent is widely expected to invite challenges of other rules set by government agencies.

“Every agency is going to face new hurdles in the wake of this confusing decision," said Alexandra Givens, the president and CEO of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington-based digital rights nonprofit. “But hopefully the agencies will continue doing their jobs and push forward."

The Federal Trade Commission, in particular, has been pursuing an aggressive agenda in consumer protection, data privacy and tech industry competition under a leader appointed last year by President Joe Biden.

Biden's picks for the five-member Federal Communications Commission have also been pursuing stronger “net neutrality” protections banning internet providers from slowing down or blocking access to websites and applications that don’t pay for premium service.

A former chief technologist at the FTC during President Donald Trump's administration said the ruling is likely to instill some fear in lawyers at the FTC and other federal agencies about how far they can go in making new rules affecting businesses.

The court “basically said when it comes to major policy changes that can transform entire sectors of the economy, Congress has to make those choices, not agencies,” said Neil Chilson, who is now a fellow at libertarian-leaning Stand Together, founded by the billionaire industrialist Charles Koch.


Givens disagreed, arguing that many agencies, especially the FTC, have clear authority and should be able to withstand lawsuits inspired by the EPA decision. She noted that Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the opinion, repeatedly described it as an “extraordinary" situation.

Givens is among the tech advocates calling for Congress to act with urgency to make laws protecting digital privacy and other tech matters. But she said laws typically stay on the books for decades, and it's unrealistic to expect Congress to weigh in on every new technical development that questions an agency's mandate.

“We need a democratic system where Congress can give expert agencies the power to address issues when they arise, even when those issues are unforeseen,” she said. “The government literally can’t work with Congress legislating every twist and turn.”

Empowered by Congress in the 1970s to tackle “unfair or deceptive" business practices, the FTC has been in the vanguard of Biden’s government-wide mandate to promote competition in some industries, including Big Tech, health care and agriculture. A panoply of targets include hearing aid prices, airline baggage fees and “product of USA” labels on food.

Under Chair Lina Khan, the FTC also has widened the door to more actively writing new regulations in what critics say is a broader interpretation of the agency’s legal authority. That initiative could run into stiff legal challenges in the wake of the high court decision. The ruling could call into question the agency’s regulatory agenda — leading it to either tread more cautiously or face tougher and more expensive legal challenges.

Khan "hasn’t really been someone who pursues soft measures, so it may be a damn-the-torpedoes approach,” Chilson said.

University of Massachusetts internet policy expert Ethan Zuckerman said it would be hard to gauge any potential impact of the court’s ruling on existing tech regulation. That's partly because “there’s just not that much tech regulation to undo," he said.

He said one target could be the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “a bête noire for many conservatives.” Big companies such as Facebook parent Meta could also potentially appeal tough enforcement actions on the idea that federal agencies weren't explicitly authorized to regulate social media.

“We’re in uncharted territory, with a court that’s taking a wrecking ball to precedent and seems hell-bent on implementing as many right-wing priorities as possible in the shortest possible time,” Zuckerman said.

The ruling could dampen the appetite for agencies like the FTC to act to limit harm from artificial intelligence and other new technologies. It could have less effect on new rules that are more clearly in the realm of the agency imposing them.

Michael Brooks, chief counsel for the nonprofit Center for Auto Safety, said the ruling isn’t likely to change the government’s ability to regulate auto safety or self-driving vehicles, although it does open the door to court challenges.

For instance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has clear authority to regulate auto safety from a 1966 motor vehicle safety law, Brooks said.

“As long as the rules they are issuing pertain to the safety of the vehicle and not anything that’s outside of their authority, as long as it’s related to safety, I don’t see how a court could do an end run around the safety act,” he said.

Unlike the EPA, an agency with authority granted by multiple, complex laws, NHTSA’s "authority is just so crystal clear," Brooks said.

NHTSA could have problems if it strayed too far from regulating safety. For example, if it enacted regulations aimed to shift buyers away from SUVs to more fuel-efficient cars, that might be struck down, he said. But the agency has historically stuck to its mission of regulating auto safety with some authority on fuel economy, he said.

However, it’s possible that a company such as Tesla, which has tested the limits of NHTSA’s powers, could sue and win due to an unpredictable Supreme Court, Brooks said.

___

Associated Press writers Marcy Gordon in Washington, Frank Bajak in Boston and Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.

10 Recession-Proof Stocks That Will Let You Wait Out the Bear

Whoever coined the expression that patience is a virtue probably never invested money in the equity markets. It can be excruciating to see a stock's price plummet. And that's particularly true when the stock was possibly at all-time highs just one year ago.

Here's the good news. In some cases, the reasons you liked the stock still exist. If that's true, then there's reason to believe that the stock price may recover.

The bad news is there's no way to know for sure when that will be. And anyone who says they do is not telling you the truth.

So what's an investor to do? We believe the answer is to be selective. And right now that means looking at best-in-class stocks that are built to ride out recessions.

In this special presentation, we'll give you seven stocks to consider as you look for safe stocks that give you an opportunity for growth and that pay a dividend for good measure. Here are the 7 recession-proof stocks that will let you wait out this bear market.

View the "10 Recession-Proof Stocks That Will Let You Wait Out the Bear".

Free Email Newsletter

Complete the form below to receive the latest headlines and analysts' recommendations for your stocks with our free daily email newsletter:

Most Read This Week

Recent Articles

Search Headlines:

Latest PodcastFind Investing Opportunities For The Rest of 2022

Today, Kate’s guest is Rhys Williams, chief investment officer for the Opportunistic All Cap Equity, a long-short strategy at Spouting Rock Asset Management.

MarketBeat Resources

Premium Research Tools

MarketBeat All Access subscribers can access stock screeners, the Idea Engine, data export tools, research reports, and other premium tools.

Discover All Access

Market Data and Calendars

Looking for new stock ideas? Want to see which stocks are moving? View our full suite of financial calendars and market data tables, all for free.

View Market Data

Investing Education and Resources

Receive a free world-class investing education from MarketBeat. Learn about financial terms, types of investments, trading strategies and more.

Financial Terms
Details Here
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau MarketBeat is rated as Great on TrustPilot

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2022. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | contact@marketbeat.com | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Information | RSS Feeds

© 2022 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see Barchart's disclaimer.