Free Trial

Trump asks Supreme Court to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission

President Donald Trump speaks to the media before walking across the South Lawn of the White House to board Marine One en route to Joint Base Andrews, Md., and on to Florida, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Key Points

  • The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to allow the removal of three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission who were fired by President Trump and later reinstated by a federal judge.
  • The Justice Department argues the president has the authority to fire independent agency board members, citing a recent high court ruling that endorsed a robust view of presidential power.
  • U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox ruled in June that the firings were unlawful, distinguishing the CPSC’s consumer-protection role from other agencies where removals have been allowed.
  • The case could prompt the Supreme Court to reconsider Humphrey’s Executor, the 1935 precedent that bars presidents from firing independent board members without cause.
  • MarketBeat previews the top five stocks to own by August 1st.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to remove three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, who were fired by President Donald Trump and then reinstated by a federal judge.

Trump has the power to fire independent agency board members, the Justice Department argued in its filing to the high court, pointing to a May ruling by the Supreme Court that endorsed a robust view of presidential power.

The administration asked the court for an immediate order to allow the firings to go forward, over the objections of lawyers for the commissioners.

The commission helps protect consumers from dangerous products by issuing recalls, suing errant companies and more. Trump fired the three Democrats on the five-member commission in May. They were serving seven-year terms after being nominated by President Joe Biden.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox in Baltimore ruled in June that the dismissals were unlawful. Maddox sought to distinguish the commission's role from those of other agencies where the Supreme Court has allowed firings to go forward.

A month earlier, the high court's conservative majority declined to reinstate members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board finding that the Constitution appears to give the president the authority to fire the board members “without cause.” The three liberal justices dissented.

The administration has argued that all the agencies are under Trump's control as the head of the executive branch.

Maddox, a Biden nominee, noted that it can be difficult to characterize the product safety commission's functions as purely executive.

The fight over the president's power to fire could prompt the court to consider overturning a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey’s Executor. In that case from 1935, the court unanimously held that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause.

The decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination, the airwaves and much else. But it has long rankled conservative legal theorists who argue the modern administrative state gets the Constitution all wrong because such agencies should answer to the president.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission was created in 1972. Its five members must maintain a partisan split, with no more than three representing the president’s party. They serve staggered terms.

That structure ensures that each president has “the opportunity to influence, but not control,” the commission, attorneys for the fired commissioners wrote in court filings. They argued the recent terminations could jeopardize the commission’s independence.

Should You Invest $1,000 in Supreme Right Now?

Before you consider Supreme, you'll want to hear this.

MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Supreme wasn't on the list.

While Supreme currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.

View The Five Stocks Here

13 Stocks Institutional Investors Won't Stop Buying Cover

Which stocks are hedge funds and endowments buying in today's market? Enter your email address and we'll send you MarketBeat's list of thirteen stocks that institutional investors are buying now.

Get This Free Report
Like this article? Share it with a colleague.

Featured Articles and Offers

Recent Videos

3 Cheap Growth Stocks Set to Explode This Summer
The Next NVIDIA? Quantum Computing Stocks Set for Explosive Growth
5 Stocks to BUY NOW in July 2025

Stock Lists

All Stock Lists

Investing Tools

Calendars and Tools

Search Headlines