NYSE:QS QuantumScape Q3 2023 Earnings Report $8.26 -0.44 (-5.01%) Closing price 08/6/2025 03:59 PM EasternExtended Trading$8.36 +0.10 (+1.27%) As of 04:19 AM Eastern Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Polygon.io. Learn more. ProfileEarnings HistoryForecast QuantumScape EPS ResultsActual EPS-$0.23Consensus EPS -$0.21Beat/MissMissed by -$0.02One Year Ago EPSN/AQuantumScape Revenue ResultsActual RevenueN/AExpected RevenueN/ABeat/MissN/AYoY Revenue GrowthN/AQuantumScape Announcement DetailsQuarterQ3 2023Date10/25/2023TimeN/AConference Call DateWednesday, October 25, 2023Conference Call Time5:00PM ETUpcoming EarningsQuantumScape's Q3 2025 earnings is scheduled for Wednesday, October 22, 2025, with a conference call scheduled at 5:00 PM ET. Check back for transcripts, audio, and key financial metrics as they become available.Conference Call ResourcesConference Call AudioConference Call TranscriptPress Release (8-K)Quarterly Report (10-Q)Earnings HistoryCompany ProfilePowered by QuantumScape Q3 2023 Earnings Call TranscriptProvided by QuartrOctober 25, 2023 ShareLink copied to clipboard.Key Takeaways A0 prototype top cell achieved over 1,000 full cycles with 95%+ discharge energy retention at C/3 charge/discharge, marking a new high-water mark for automotive-format lithium metal batteries. QSE5, slated as the first commercial product, integrates 24 layers, higher cathode loading (~5 mAh/cm²) and proprietary FlexFrame packaging to enable disruptive performance. Manufacturing scale efforts remain on track, with Raptor separator process qualification targeting year-end deployment and COBRA process equipment installed to support higher-volume B-sample production by end-2025. QuantumScape raised $300 million in a public offering and holds $1.1 billion in liquidity, extending its cash runway into 2026 while lowering 2023 CapEx guidance to $75–100 million. Significant challenges persist in improving cell reliability, ensuring high quality and scaling large-volume production of the more stress-intensive QSE5 design. AI Generated. May Contain Errors.Conference Call Audio Live Call not available Earnings Conference CallQuantumScape Q3 202300:00 / 00:00Speed:1x1.25x1.5x2xThere are 10 speakers on the call. Operator00:00:00Good day, and welcome to QuantumScape's Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. John Sager, QuantumScape's Vice President of Capital Markets and FP and A, you may now begin your conference. Speaker 100:00:15Thank you, operator. Good afternoon and thank you to everyone for joining QuantumScape's Q3 2023 earnings call. To supplement today's discussion, Please go to our IR website at ir.quantoscape.com to view our shareholder letter. Before we begin, I want to call your attention to the Safe Harbor provision for forward looking statements that is posted on our website as part of our quarterly update. Forward looking statements generally relate to future events, future technology progress or future financial or operating performance. Speaker 100:00:46Our expectations and beliefs regarding these matters may not materialize. Actual results and financial periods are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. There are risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the content of our forward looking statements for the reasons that we cite in our shareholder letter, Form 10 ks and other SEC filings, including uncertainties posed by the difficulty in predicting future outcomes. Joining us today will be QuantumScape's Co Founder, CEO and Chairman, Jagdeep Singh our CFO, Kevin Hetrick and a new addition to our team, Doctor. Sivva Sivaram, President. Speaker 100:01:26With that, I'd like to turn the call over to JP. Speaker 200:01:29Thanks, John. I'd like to begin today's call by introducing our newly hired President, Doctor. Siva Sivaram. Siva holds a PhD in Materials Science and brings extensive experience in high volume manufacturing of advanced Technology Products, most recently serving as President at WESN Digital, a global leader in solid state and magnetic data storage. Before that, He held leadership positions at pioneer and technology companies including SanDisk, Matrix Semiconductor and Intel. Speaker 200:01:58We're thrilled to have him on board. I'll start by covering our customer prototype testing. As we reported last year, we shipped our first a0 prototype sales to prospective customers in Q4 2022 with the goal of providing a proof of concept demonstration of a 24 layer anode free solid state Lithium Metal Battery Cell. We can now share that our top performing A0 prototype cell in our automated OEMs battery testing labs achieved over 1,000 full cycle equivalents with over 95% discharge energy retention using customer specified test conditions of C over 3 charge and CO2 discharge with our standard temperature and pressure conditions and 100% depth of discharge. I'd like to point out that this is the best performing cell and we have work to do on aspects such as reliability. Speaker 200:02:49Nonetheless, this is an exceptional result. We're not aware of any automotive format lithium metal battery that has shown such high discharge energy retention over a comparable cycle count at room temperature and modest pressure regardless of sea rate. We believe that no competing electrolyte, solid or liquid, has demonstrated sufficient stability with lithium metal to achieve this and that this result sets a new high watermark for lithium metal battery performance. This result is especially meaningful because the a0 prototype has the same number of layers as our production intense cell and uses our proprietary cell format. Together with the higher loading capital results reported in our Q1 2023 shareholder letter, We've now separately demonstrated 3 key aspects of our production intense cell design, 24 layers, higher cathode loading and our new cell format. Speaker 200:03:46When these aspects are combined, along with improvements of packaging efficiency and manufacturing process controls and automation for improved reliability, informs the core of our first commercial product, QSE5. The cover photo of this quarter's shared letter shows a mock up of our QSE5 cell format. It's important to keep in mind that since QSE5 will have higher loading cathodes and more efficient packaging than our A0 prototype cell, it will sustain higher current densities and be built with tighter margins, resulted in more stress on the cell. We must also continue to work on producing these cells in large volumes with high quality and reliability. These factors present significant challenges. Speaker 200:04:30Nevertheless, we believe this remarkable result makes clear said that our technology can achieve disruptive performance at commercial and temporary accounts, further increasing our confidence in the transformative potential of our technology and product roadmap. Next, a word about our customer engagements. Right now, Our primary focus is on QSE5 development with the goal of enabling superior performance on a range of potential automotive applications Across motorsport, passenger and commercial vehicles, including motorcycles, cars, trucks and SUVs. As we reported last quarter, we're collaborating closely with a prospective launch customer in the automotive sector for QSE5. While the scale of this initial application is by design small, it represents an important vehicle proof of concept that we believe has high visibility and the potential to lead to other programs in the future. Speaker 200:05:29We're pleased with the progress the joint teams have made so far on module and pack integration and system design, The significant work remains. For example, we continue to refine and finalize the design parameters of QSE5, which will determine the specific thermal and mechanical behavior of the cell. Beyond automotive, We remain engaged with prospective customers in the consumer electronics sector. And in Q3, we entered into a technology evaluation agreement with a leading global consumer electronics player. We believe the ability of our solid state platform to maintain good cycling performance with 0 externally applied pressure meets a key design requirement for these applications. Speaker 200:06:13The single layer sister cells that we first reported on in our Q3 2022 Shareholder Letter have now achieved between 15,021,000 cycles to approximately 80% discharge energy retention with 0 externally applied pressure. Next, an update on our product development. Our planned first commercial product is QSE5, which uses the proprietary format first demonstrated in A0 prototypes last year. This innovative format is a hybrid of conventional pouch and prismatic cell designs to address the uniaxial expansion of lithium metal as it plates and strips during charging and discharging. We call this novel format FlexFrame. Speaker 200:06:56A key technical goal for the year is to improve cell packaging efficiency relative to the A0 prototype cells we ship to prospective customers in 2022. This involves reducing the space taken up by the inactive material and flex frame package as well as increasing the amount of active material in the cell, which we expect will enable the final commercial design to reach our energy density targets. When comparing the A0 prototype To our current B0 design, the B0s are designed to pack the same number of layers with more energy per layer into a slimmer cell package. We plan to provide a detailed look at the innovative flex flame architecture in an upcoming webinar. Now let me hand it over to Simba for an update on our manufacturing scale. Speaker 300:07:45Thanks, David. I'll begin with an update on Speaker 200:07:48our Raptor process. As a reminder, Raptor Speaker 300:07:52is designed to deliver up to 3 times RASM instrument throughput using similar equipment to our last generation process, while applying less energy per separator. In Q3, we began process qualification of Raptor equipment on schedule. Process qualification involves producing films, gathering data to characterize their quality and consistency and using that feedback to refine our process specs. We are pleased with the early returns from the qualification testing. And while there is work remaining to dial in this process, we continue to target deployment of Raptor by the end of the year. Speaker 300:08:32We also continue to make progress on our next generation COBRA process, which is planned to support higher volume B sample production from our consolidated QL0 pre pilot line. Along with separated heat treatment equipment, in Q3, we took delivery, installed and commissioned key pieces of equipment related to process automation such as unit cell assembly equipment. More automation not only increases our cell production capacity, but also reduces manual handling, which is a common source of run to run variation and tends to adversely impact reliability. We plan to continue process development and automation deployment to enable higher quality, consistency and Throughput as we build out our manufacturing capability. Overall, we are pleased with our manufacturing scale and progress, But more work remains, including continuing to drive our defect reduction and quality improvement initiatives, Integrating advanced metrology and data collection and developing additional process automation. Speaker 300:09:45With that, let me turn things over to Kevin for an update on our financial outlook. Speaker 400:09:52Thanks, Eva. 3rd quarter 2023 capital expenditures were $18,000,000 GAAP operating expenses were $121,000,000 Cash operating expenses defined as operating expenses less stock based compensation and depreciation for $64,000,000 For the full year 2023, we maintain our guidance on cash operating expenses of $225,000,000 to $275,000,000 and revised our CapEx guidance to $75,000,000 to $100,000,000 Approximately one 3rd of the reduction in expected CapEx spend is due to realized savings. Examples include successful value engineering, negotiated price reductions and completion of certain projects under budget. The remaining approximate 2 thirds is due to shifts in timing, which can be broken down into 3 broad categories: certain items we deferred because we had additional schedule buffer items where we previously forecasted more front loaded payment timing than what will actually be required and updates to aspects of our equipment strategy. Despite these changes in the timing of CapEx, We continue to target low volume B samples in 2024 and higher volume B samples in 2025. Speaker 400:11:07During Q3, our CapEx primarily went toward facility and equipment spend for our consolidated QS0 pre pilot line, including for our Raptor process. For the remainder of the year, our CapEx will continue to be predominantly allocated toward QS0. During the quarter, We raised $300,000,000 in gross proceeds from our public fall on offering. We ended Q3 with over $1,100,000,000 in liquidity and continue to look for opportunities to optimize our spending and be prudent with our strong balance sheet. We now forecast that our cash runway will extend into 2026. Speaker 400:11:43Any additional funds raised from capital markets activity, including under our ATM perspective supplement would further extend this cash runway. Longer term, our capital requirements will be a function of our industrialization business model, which we believe could reflect a mix of wholly owned production, Joint Venture and Licensing Relationships. With that, I'll hand things over to Jagdeep for a final word Speaker 200:12:06on our strategic outlook. Thanks, Kevin. Fundamentally, our focus for 2023 is simple, turn the corner from prototype to product. Our key milestones are all aimed at advancing product development to build a sufficient level of technical and manufacturing maturity to enable initial production of the QSE5 cell. With just a few months remaining in the year, we're maintaining aggressive near term schedules and remain focused on bringing a potentially disruptive first product to market in the near future. Speaker 200:12:37But strategically, our mission is bigger than a series of near term objectives. We've been pursuing a next generation electric vehicle battery for over a decade. And with a mission as challenging and important as this, Long term thinking is indispensable. Moreover, the market opportunity for our technology platform is massive, potentially in the 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars annually for decades to come. With that in mind, this year we've also taken steps to strengthen our long term strategic position. Speaker 200:13:07For example, this quarter, we seized the opportunity to fortify our balance sheet, extending our forecasted cash runway into 2026 and securing funding for pivotal development and deployment milestones, including higher volume B samples based on our COBRA separator process, which if achieved would have a transformative effect on our business. We've also built on our strong customer relationships and deepened our engagement with a prospective launch customer for our first product. And we continue to add manufacturing experience and Technical Excellence to our team at every level. At the close of Q3, we feel prepared to face the inevitable and innumerable has short term challenges on the way to our goal because we've laid a strong foundation for long term success. We look forward to reporting our challenges and the successes and the quarters to Speaker 100:13:57come. Thanks, Jagdeep. We'll begin today's Q and A portion with a few questions we've received from investors or that I believe investors would be interested in. Jagdeep, we'll start with you. And I wanted to ask about our newly hired President, Doctor. Speaker 100:14:09Sivasevaram. Could you tell me a little bit about your expectations for him in his new role and why you felt somebody with his background and experience was a good fit for us at this stage of our development. Speaker 200:14:20Sure. So we're thrilled to have Siva join the team. We've said that our main goal for the year was to turn the corner from prototype to product. In support of that, we've been working on the scale up of the Processes, Equipment and Automation associated with higher volume, higher quality production. A key part of this is, of course, having the expertise needed to do this. Speaker 200:14:41We wanted to bolster our senior management team with someone who brought not only super high volume production experience, but experience in sophisticated manufacturing processes Such as those found in the semiconductor or Mandaig storage industries. But we don't think we could have found a better fit than with CIBA, Who was President at Western Digital, ran 1 of the world's largest data storage companies with $18,000,000,000 in revenue in 2022 and something like a 40% share of the hard drive market. The company shipped literally millions of units per year and these units involved highly advanced manufacturing processes and Supply Chains. For example, as you might know, modern disk drives have magnetic heads that float on the order of 5 nanometers above the surface of a platter is spinning at several 1000 RPM and do this repeatedly and with very high reliability. He was also a pioneer with multi layer semiconductor technology, Which now routinely achieves over 200 layers. Speaker 200:15:39We think all of this experience will be invaluable as we scale up our equipment and increase our quality and reliability. Okay. And now a question for Siva. Speaker 100:15:48Siva, now that you've been with QuantumScape for a couple of months, I wanted to get your initial impressions as well as your assessment. Why do you think QuantumScape's technology is scalable and what needs to be done to make that happen? Speaker 300:15:59Thanks, John. It's been a very active and involved last couple of months. Even before I came to the company, I spent a lot of time developing an understanding of the electrochemistry, the material science, the thermodynamics Of QuantumScapes Technology. So now that I'm here, what has impressed me first and foremost is the quality and commitment of the people. The depth of expertise and experience that's here within QuantumScape. Speaker 300:16:28I see the rigor that we have in the development and the collection and management Speaker 200:16:34of data that gives me confidence in Speaker 300:16:36the company's core competencies. It's very interesting to note the similarities to my prior semiconductor and magnetic storage experience, whether it is in hard drive assembly, and we can get to Bakken. On battery manufacturing, as we scale to higher volumes, the key to scaling is defect reduction, Process Control and a high level of automation. I've also seen that the ecosystem at QuantumScape is very well developed provides the incoming materials, equipment, setting up a very robust supply chain. And the depth of interaction with top tier customer. Speaker 300:17:14They have studied feedback. This sets the tone for continuous improvement as we ramp. Overall, the company and the technology are well poised for scaling. Speaker 100:17:26Great. Thanks so much, Siva. Devin, turning to you, a question submitted by one of our investors. Can you provide some additional context on the $300,000,000 follow on offering closed in August? How does this fit into your long term approach to capital management? Speaker 400:17:41Thank you, John, for the question on behalf of the investor. In the first half of this year, we hit several product and manufacturing milestones on the path to commercialization. We believe that the time was right for a follow on equity is based on the product manufacturing and customer momentum of the company. On the product development front, recall that in our Q2 shareholder letter, We shared higher cathode performance higher cathode loading performance data and shipped unit cells with these cathodes to multiple partners. On the manufacturing front, in Q2, we completed site acceptance for our Raptor equipment, tracking to our year end goal to deploy the fast separator process. Speaker 400:18:22And on the customer front, we had announced that we engaged with a prospective launch customer in the automotive space to bring QSE5 to market. So we felt like we were on strong footing on a number of fronts and wanted to ensure that our capital run rate would extend into 2026, which funds the build out of our QS0 COBRA line and production of our higher volume B samples targeted at the end of 2025. Speaker 100:18:45Okay, great. Thanks, Kevin, so much for that insight. Jagmeet, with approximately 2 months left in the year, can you summarize for investors How we're tracking against our 2023 goals that we laid out for investors in February, specifically what work remains to be done? Speaker 200:19:00Sure, John. So at the beginning of the year, we laid out 4 key goals for the year that we thought were critical to helping turn the corner from prototype to production. The first was to increase the loading of the cathode to approximately 3,000,000 amp hours per centimeter squared to approximately 5,000,000 amp hours per centimeter squared to store more energy in the cell. We reported on the Q2 call that we achieved this higher loading cathode and in fact shift unit cell prototypes with this new cathode to customers. The second key goal was to improve the efficiency of packaging. Speaker 200:19:33And on this front, our new FlexFrame package incorporates a number of improvements from narrower edge margins, the thinner contractors and thinner adhesive layers. The other two goals were production related and having to do with our Raptor process and reliability. And I'll turn it Speaker 300:19:49over to Siva to talk about those. Thanks, Jaipik. The 3rd goal was to install and deploy our new Raptor process. We have installed and qualified the Raptor equipment. We are starting to produce high quality films and are optimizing the process to meet our performance targets. Speaker 300:20:06We are making good progress towards rapid deployment by the end of the year. And finally on reliability, we have undertaken and completed over a dozen initiatives to reduce the activity and are now focused on process enhancements that we believe will take our reliability up to a new level. Of course, reliability is never done. Requires an ongoing effort to readout and eliminate potential failure modes, especially as we introduce new improved scaled up processes. Speaker 100:20:38Okay. Thanks so much, guys. We're now ready to begin the live portion of today's call. Operator, please open up the line for questions. Operator00:20:47Thank One moment please for your first question. Your first question comes from the line of Douglas Jatin with Evercore ISI. Your line Speaker 400:21:08is open. Hi, Jagdeep and Kevin, and welcome, Subha. Appreciate the nice update here. Can I just quickly ask for a little more detail on the B sample timeline, specifically if you can confirm when the timeline for production with Raptor looks to be right now? Previously, I believe you said about 18 months after the A sample, which would imply the B sample timing around mid-twenty 4. Speaker 400:21:28This release only quotes calendar year 2024. So Is there anything else you can tell us on the timing for those first B0 samples, given that it seems the Raptor certification and testing process is coming along well? Speaker 200:21:41Yes. As Sila mentioned, we're pleased with the way the Raptor qualification process is going. The equipment has been installed and we're qualifying the process as we speak for deployment data this year. And we do believe we're still targeting 2024 for The low volume B samples. When we provided the 18 month guidance, that, of course, was General approximate guidance. Speaker 200:22:07But I think the targets that we're still tracking to are in 2024 is when we hope to have when we are targeting to have the first The low volume V0 samples. Subsequently to that, we expect to have higher volume V samples using a new cold draw process before the end of 2025. So those are the 2 key milestones for us coming up next year and the year after, are using the Raptor process to introduce low volume B samples in 2024 and the COBRA process, which is even faster as you know, to introduce the higher volume B samples in 2025. Okay. Okay. Speaker 200:22:43That's helpful. And then just a Speaker 400:22:45quick one on Toyota's Solid state news over the last couple of days. The company is claiming a doubling of EV range with their solution. There is no new tech here, right? They're simply adding in significantly more kilowatt hours, due to the smaller space required in a solid state design, to achieve that stated range. Is that your understanding? Speaker 400:23:04Thanks, Speaker 200:23:05Dean. Yes. So first of all, I want to say that we're genuinely pleased to see a company like Toyota endorsing solid state batteries as the future of EVs. We obviously agree we've been on solid state for a long time. Having said that, Toyota has announced that it's using a sulfide based approach, which does come with some challenges. Speaker 200:23:24We've done a lot of work on sulfides ourselves here. If you look at our patent portfolio, a number of those patents are in the sulfide space. And one of the key challenges with sulfide based approaches is low cycle life that results from poor electrochemical stability and the Tends to form lithium metal dendrites. Now if the dendrite problem isn't addressed, then there are sort of 2 basic options. 1 is to revert back to a Carbon or silicon based host material as opposed to lithium metal, but then that results in reduced energy density and power density relative to lithium metal anode. Speaker 200:23:57And the other option is to run under what we consider to be compromised test conditions, I. E, elevated temperatures or very high pressures or low rates of charge and discharge or a short cycle life. So All of those approaches we think make the approach unsuitable for commercial vehicles. We're not aware of data from anyone demonstrates that these fundamental challenges of lithium metal bainite formation in sulfide based systems has been addressed at room temperature and mild pressures. But if they like us, we welcome seeing it. Speaker 200:24:32And of course, the data we shared today, if you look at the first chart in our shareholder letter, That shows data from our A024 layer prototype cells, which of course we shipped in 2022, that achieved 1,000 cycles with a remarkable 95% capacity retention, which as we mentioned in the call, we believe is a high watermark for cycle life and automotive format, solid lithium metal batteries. So we think the data is very clear on the capabilities of this approach. Operator00:25:15Your next question comes from the line of Winnie Dong with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Speaker 500:25:21Hi. Thanks so much for answering your questions. I was wondering if you can elaborate on the challenges being written about in your shareholder letter, More specifically on combining the high capital loading with more efficient packaging and then in the new QSC V format. Essentially, what are the hurdles that need to be overcome for this combination to be Speaker 200:25:49Yes. It's a good question. So as we pointed out in the letter, if you look at the differences between the A0 we shipped last year and the QSE 5 that we intend to ship next year. There's a few key areas where that account for the biggest differences. One is the layer count. Speaker 200:26:07I'm sorry, the layer count is in fact the same. We're shipping the QSE5 will be a 24 layer cell And the A Zeros that we shipped last year were also 24 to ourselves. So we've shown we can do that. The second thing that the QSE-five needs to have is a Higher loading cathode, so specifically roughly 5 milliamp hour per centimeter squared loading cathode. The A-0s we shipped had a 3,000,000 amp hour capo. Speaker 200:26:37And we showed earlier this year results from 5,000,000 of our cathodes. I think it was on the Q2 call. And we've since shipped those sells with those higher living capitals to customers. The 3rd piece is we need to put all this into our new, more efficient FlexFrame Package. And we've mentioned on the call that we've already made progress towards that in the form of reduced Margins and thinner adhesive layers and current vector layers, all those we think we'll play into that. Speaker 200:27:14So when you take those three things that we've demonstrated separately and combine them together and then add to that The improvements that we're talking about with reliability that come from process control and more automation, you end up with is the core of what is QSE Vios. I think the way we think about it is from a risk standpoint, we believe we've demonstrated Many of the key aspects of the QRC5 sales already separately, and sort of if you used software technology at the unit cell level unit test level. And now we just need to bring them together into an integrated cell. So it's more of an integration task, But we now when we have QSE5, then it is a task of developing fundamentally new features. So that's kind of where we are on QSE5. Speaker 500:28:10Thank you. That's really helpful. And then on the work with the prospective launch customer for QSC V, is there any additional color you can provide in terms of Initial customer feedback or testing feedback as far example, are the design parameters that this customer is looking at in line with less or more stringent than the gold standards that you're targeting in terms of self performance? Speaker 200:28:39Yes, that's a great question. So, one of the criteria we had to pick this initial launch customer was we wanted a customer that was excited about the QSE5 sale as is, because obviously we don't want to have to go redesign the sale or change the form factor Or do anything else that could delay our time to market. So we're pleased that this particular customer is in fact is excited about the capabilities of QSE5. And I think we reported on the QSE5 capabilities in our last earnings call Where we showed a landscape map of energy versus power, and we believe that QSE5 occupies A unique space in that landscape. The other thing about this customer is that the volume needs that they have, We believe we can satisfy from our QS0 facility here in San Jose. Speaker 200:29:31And then the final thing about this customer is that The level of maturity they're expecting is consistent with what we believe we'll have with our higher volume B samples. So on all three of those metrics, Volume levels, maturity levels and product functionality. This is a very good match for what we have. And that's why we're excited, that's why both sides, Frontier, are excited about its capability, and we look forward to continue to work with them closely. Speaker 500:30:00Thank you so much. Speaker 200:30:02Absolutely. Operator00:30:04Sorry, your next question comes from the line of Ben Kallo with Baird. Your line is Speaker 600:30:11open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Siva, congrats on the new role. Just maybe Steve, with your new role, we heard about what's similar To your previous roles, what do you think the difficulties are compared to your previous roles. Speaker 600:30:38And I have a follow-up. Speaker 300:30:41Thanks, Ben. My prior role has always been taking advanced technologies into very high volumes. How do we integrate the technology into materials, processes and equipment and scale it up? And I have done this several times in the past. When I came into QuantumScape, that's exactly what I am Hoping to accomplish very soon. Speaker 300:31:07The technology is in a great place. The customer demand is there. The market is very large. It's up to us to now scale what we have into a product that we can deliver to customers And I'm looking forward to that challenge. Speaker 600:31:26Doug, Deepa and Kevin, congrats on the raise, those sparks. Just as you deploy capital and you have partners come How has it changed as we move forward and you test out stuff, Our partners were willing to invest capital so you could save the money or how do we think about this going forward with your capital deployment? Speaker 400:31:56Yes, Ben, thank you for the question. First, on the $300,000,000 gross proceeds raise, We felt the timing was right based on all the momentum that we had during the year. On the product with the announcement of the QSE5, The manufacturing process with the Raptor equipment in having passed that acceptance and then all the customer transaction all the customer traction that Jagdeep mentioned where we're working with a prospective launch customer in the automotive space for that initial high visibility small volume launch. Moving forward, I would also highlight that in prior calls, We are open to multiple different business models in the fullness of time. We see options with wholly owned capacity as the case with QSCRO, joint venture relationships, which you're well familiar with as well as licensing relationships. Speaker 400:32:54And separately, as we've also discussed on prior calls, there's a lot of momentum behind investments in clean energy, specifically Closed loop domestic supply chains here in the United States. Those are also things which we track those opportunities to be as capital light And efficient with the capital that we do have as possible. Speaker 600:33:20Maybe the last one, I'll sneak in. That's with everything going on, I don't know, UAW, everything in the world. Have you seen any of your partners Like pullback from relationships and timelines or partnerships with the U. S? Speaker 400:33:42I would almost say the opposite. I think with turmoil in the world and So the growing realization for the importance for the penetration of electric vehicles, both direct and indirect jobs They can bring the importance to the environment that we actually see more excitement around the space. And then within that, what differential battery technology like we're working with it has the prompts to completely shift out the power and energy frontier as our QSE5, While eliminating as manufactured 1 of the 2 components, it's a pretty amazing thing and we remain excited and as we've talked about, that's just The start of what our technology platform promises. Speaker 600:34:29Thank you, Operator00:34:39Your next question comes from the line of Jordan Levy with Truett Securities. Your line is open. Speaker 700:34:48Hi, team. This is Henry on for Jordan. I just want to firstly touch on the CapEx savings you all have realized So far, I don't expect to realize by the end of the year. Just want to touch on, I guess, any color you can add Around some of the different puts and takes there with that material cost kind of coming down, more efficient installations through processes and is are there any learnings you guys are going to take or can take into 2024 and beyond? Speaker 400:35:15It's a good question. Philosophically, we Think about this in terms of big projects and small projects. We regularly get together as a team and think through things that we can do Differently or smarter to save CapEx is the same as this true with OpEx. And then also, I think the whole company has rallied around the idea of Spending more smartly and more effectively. And we also encourage and then publicly celebrate ideas that Folks bring forward that we then put into actions. Speaker 400:35:48So that's and then when you break it down, it's really That one third of savings that I referenced in my script is actually broken down into a lot of smaller projects, but it's definitely credit to the broader company for realizing. I think it's also important as we transition from a Product Development Company to one of manufacturing that has to be in our very DNA. Speaker 700:36:16That's great to hear. And then just a quick follow-up on some of the recent graphite export news out of China. I'm Just wondering if you guys are seeing at all any a boost in interest in your technology with some of these geopolitical risks around battery materials kind of Starting to play out a little bit. And do Speaker 800:36:31you think this will have Speaker 700:36:32a pretty large effect or pretty minimal in the long term kind of demand for solid state versus some of the other factors like Higher energy density and the performance enhancements. Speaker 400:36:43Henry, terrific question. From an industry point of view, Our design eliminates the graphite anode material from the cell, which this has two advantages. As you point out, it eliminates a supply chain bottleneck and associated risks of securing supply in a crowded market. And second, as you also alluded to, in eliminating the in house material, we realized benefits in terms of energy density and charge time. Of course, to do this, You will need a highly stable solid state separator, which is our core IP. Speaker 700:37:18Thank you, guys. Operator00:37:21Your next question comes from the line of Chris Snyder with UBS. Your line is open. Speaker 900:37:28Thank you. I wanted to ask on the A0 24 layer prototype sell and specifically that first Shar in the shareholder letter, which shows the test results from a customer battery lab. Clearly, really strong results there. But the letter does note that this was the best performing sell. So maybe could you just frame this a little bit more for us, whether it's kind of Was this one sell out of how many? Speaker 900:37:58Anything around just the delta between this particular sell and the rest? Was it a big outlier? Are they all generally similar? Any way just kind of frame that more. Thank you. Speaker 200:38:13Sure. Happy to do that. First of all, as we've said many times in earnings calls this year, we have work to do on reliability. So that's a key area that we're focused on to make the cells more and more reliable. So every cell works as well as the best cell. Speaker 200:38:28Having said that though, with the caveat about reliability, the capacity retention curve that you're seeing here is actually very similar to what we see for most of the cells that we've shipped. In other words, the slope of this curve is really very similar across the cells. And what this cell shows is that when we make the cells with a sufficiently low level of deep activity, we end up with Really, as you point out, remarkable level of performance because 95% capacity retention at 1,000 cycles, To our knowledge, it's unheard of for lithium metal cells with a solid or liquid. And as you point out, this test was run in our automotive OEM partners lab, right. So it's their test using their equipment, using their test protocols. Speaker 200:39:25And we're just really excited that this demonstrates. This is really the purpose, as you know, of the A sample is to demonstrate the capability of the core technology. And then of course, when you get to B Sample, that's when you have to get to things like implementing that sample or that capability with production processes. And that's when the reliability and so on become more important factors. So the short answer to your question is The capacity retention curve that we're showing here is very similar to what we see across the board. Speaker 200:39:59We do have work to do on reliability to make sure every cell goes the distance. But in terms of the overall behavior, we're really excited by this result. It shows the inherent capability in our view Of what a lithium metal 0 anode design is capable of. Speaker 900:40:17Yes, happy to hear that and really Appreciate all that color. Maybe for my second question, I wanted to ask on the consumer electronics. QuantumScape, historically, you guys have been focused more on the auto market. This year, you've talked more about consumer electronics The letter talked about a technology evaluation agreement with a leading electronics player. So I guess my question is, do you think the company's first commercial products that generates revenue is more likely to be in auto or consumer electronics? Speaker 900:40:59Thank you. Speaker 200:41:00Yes. Thanks for the question and the opportunity to clarify this. 1st of all, I want to be crystal clear. Our focus has been and continues to be and remains automotive. That is our primary focus. Speaker 200:41:16That is the space within which this initial launch customer that we've been talking about is in, and those are the partnerships that we are working very closely with. We talk about consumer, however, because We believe what we have is a technology platform. We're getting a lot of interest from a lot of different sectors. And we believe it behooves us, we Almost owing to our investors to explore all those options, keep them in the running. But we don't in any way intend to let that distract us from our primary focus, which is, of course, automotive. Speaker 200:41:50There are several reasons for this. One, of course, is the fact that if you get too defocused, then you Can end up in a situation where you do nothing well. We got to do one thing and do it really well. But the other is that sector we think is by far the largest In terms of size and growth potential. So the way I would summarize it is that Our focus remains unchanged on the ongoing space of our primary market. Speaker 200:42:17However, we've said before that we have a I think we called it a Single track dual purpose design. What we mean by that is the same product in this form factor, we think has relevance To not only automotive, but also consumer. And so we by continuing on that single track, We can serve both purposes up to a point, at which point we'll have to obviously, if we're doing an actual consumer product, we'll have to make some modifications. But for the time being, we see no distraction and we continue to focus on automotive while Working with some of the consumer partners as well. Thank you, Jagdeep. Speaker 200:42:59Appreciate that. Of course. Operator00:43:03Your next question comes from the line of Gabe Daoud with TD Cowen. Your line is open. Speaker 800:43:12Hey, Jackie, Kevin and team, thanks for taking my questions. I was hoping we could maybe Just going back to the first chart that Chris noted in the shareholder letter. I guess I'd just be curious as to why the Prospective launch customer ran the test at a Cthree, Ctwo charge discharge. Just kind of curious why they would run like a 1C? Speaker 200:43:36Yes. So it's a good question. Obviously, they've added CO3 CO2 because that's the test that they wanted to run. We as you know, many of our tests, we report 1C, 1C. We do that for two reasons. Speaker 200:43:481 is 1C, 1C is even more aggressive, because it charges and discharges the entire battery in an hour. So it's going to be hard to discharge an actual battery in a car in an hour. You have to really run down 300 miles of charge of more in 1 hour, which is hard to do. And in terms of charging up the battery, 1 hour charge is typically considered to be a supercharged level of charging. And most automotive OEMs most EVs are not charged On a supercharger for every single charge. Speaker 200:44:21We do it that way because, A, we think our technology is capable of it and B, It allows us to collect data much more quickly, so we can have a faster cycle time, which of course, as you know, is key to learning and improving and continuing to execute. Having said that, from a customer standpoint, CO3 may in fact be more typical of what a typical OEM sees For a charge rate, it's a 3 hour charge. So if you plug in your car into your garage overnight, it might even be lower than that, but that's kind of what they I can't speak for the customer, but apparently that's what they have standardized on, along with a CO2 discharge. So our what we're doing here, again, is simply reporting data That was provided to us by this automotive OEM customer. They get to decide the test conditions under which they run, and that's why we reported this. Speaker 200:45:12What we think is notable is just the capacity retention that we see here With a 24 layer cell is really remarkable. And we mentioned this because, as you know, when we went public a few years ago, one of the questions some people had was, Great. You guys have shown some fantastic data at a single layer cell level. Can you replicate this in multilayer cells? And what this data demonstrates to us Is that not only can we do this in multi layer cells, in this case, 24 layer cells, But that 24 day sale is, of course, the same day account that we're targeting for our first commercial product, USC5. Speaker 200:45:53And at that 24 year level, we're seeing what we believe is industry leading performance in terms of capacity retention compared to any other lithium metal cell that we've seen. So we think it's an important data point and we thought it was worth sharing with investors, Especially because it was generated in a customer's lab by the customer using their own test protocols and their own test commissions. Speaker 800:46:21Definitely makes sense. Thanks, Jagdeep, for the clarification and color. And I guess just a quick follow-up. You noted the layer count and obviously a goal this year is just the higher cathode loading. Just curious, I think last quarter you guys showed Higher cathode loading cell that was maybe a couple of layers. Speaker 800:46:41So I was curious if there's any update around that Performance in Cycle Life and capacity retention. And I guess when could we expect to see some data With the 2 combined, meaning higher layer count with the higher capital loading? Thanks, guys. Speaker 200:46:58Yes. That's a great question and that's exactly the task that we're currently focused on is to take this 24 layer cell that we showed, that we shipped last The data from which we're showing in this letter, add to it the higher loading cathode, add to it the more efficient packaging, as I mentioned, the Thinner adhesive layers, narrow margins at the edges, thinner contractors, add to it some improvements we're making to reliability And then that becomes our QSE5. So the answer to the question of when we expect to have that is next year sometime in 2024. And I can say that the in general, the testing results from the higher loading cathodes are similar to what we've seen before, which is basically we have work to do on reliability, but the overall Behavior outside of that in terms of capacity retention and fast charge is quite good. In fact, I think we published fast charge results In the last earnings letters, so the operator is there for you to look at. Speaker 200:48:01But the basic idea is in 2024, We plan to basically combine this 24 layer cell with the high loading cathode, the more efficient packaging And the improvements to reliability that we're currently putting into our process. Speaker 400:48:18Yes. And Jamie, just We did publish fast charge data in Q2 letter. And then also it is more capital efficient to do Development work on a smaller layer count as possible. So it's just another example of us being as effective and prudent with capital as possible. Speaker 300:48:38Got it. Speaker 800:48:38Thanks for that, Kevin. Thanks, guys. Speaker 200:48:40Yes. Good question, TFC. Operator00:48:44There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call to Jagdeep for closing remarks. Speaker 200:48:52Okay. With that, I'd like to thank you all for joining us. I'd also like to thank our team for their excellent work this quarter and of course, thank our shareholders for their continued support of our mission. I look forward to sharing more as we continue ahead. Operator00:49:05This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.Read morePowered by Earnings DocumentsPress Release(8-K)Quarterly report(10-Q) QuantumScape Earnings HeadlinesWhy QuantumScape Stock Plummeted This WeekAugust 3, 2025 | fool.comIs QuantumScape a Buy After Battery Breakthroughs?August 2, 2025 | fool.comMarket Panic: Trump Just Dropped a Bomb on Your Stockstock Market Panic: Trump Just Dropped a Bomb on Your Stocks The market is in freefall—and Trump's new tariffs just lit the fuse. Millions of investors are blindsided as stocks plunge… but this is only Phase 1. If you're still holding the wrong assets, you could lose 30% or more in the coming weeks. | American Alternative (Ad)QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) Shares Down 6.8% Following Insider SellingAugust 1, 2025 | americanbankingnews.comEvercore ISI Sticks to Its Buy Rating for QuantumScape (QS)July 30, 2025 | theglobeandmail.comA $131 Million Reason to Buy QuantumScape Stock NowJuly 30, 2025 | finance.yahoo.comSee More QuantumScape Headlines Get Earnings Announcements in your inboxWant to stay updated on the latest earnings announcements and upcoming reports for companies like QuantumScape? Sign up for Earnings360's daily newsletter to receive timely earnings updates on QuantumScape and other key companies, straight to your email. Email Address About QuantumScapeQuantumScape (NYSE:QS), a research and development stage company, focuses on the development and commercialization of solid-state lithium-metal batteries for electric vehicles and other applications. The company was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in San Jose, California.View QuantumScape ProfileRead more More Earnings Resources from MarketBeat Earnings Tools Today's Earnings Tomorrow's Earnings Next Week's Earnings Upcoming Earnings Calls Earnings Newsletter Earnings Call Transcripts Earnings Beats & Misses Corporate Guidance Earnings Screener Earnings By Country U.S. Earnings Reports Canadian Earnings Reports U.K. Earnings Reports Latest Articles Rivian Takes Earnings Hit—R2 Could Be the Stock's 2026 LifelinePalantir Stock Soars After Blowout Earnings ReportVertical Aerospace's New Deal and Earnings De-Risk ProductionAmazon's Earnings: What Comes Next and How to Play ItApple Stock: Big Earnings, Small Move—Time to Buy?Why Robinhood Just Added Upside Potential After a Q2 Earnings DipMicrosoft Blasts Past Earnings—What’s Next for MSFT? Upcoming Earnings SEA (8/12/2025)Cisco Systems (8/13/2025)Alibaba Group (8/13/2025)NetEase (8/14/2025)Applied Materials (8/14/2025)NU (8/14/2025)Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.- Petrobras (8/14/2025)Deere & Company (8/14/2025)Palo Alto Networks (8/18/2025)Medtronic (8/19/2025) Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat's full suite of research tools. Start Your 30-Day Trial MarketBeat All Access Features Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring Get personalized stock ideas. Compare portfolio to indices. Check stock news, ratings, SEC filings, and more. Stock Ideas and Recommendations See daily stock ideas from top analysts. Receive short-term trading ideas from MarketBeat. Identify trending stocks on social media. Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools Use our seven stock screeners to find suitable stocks. Stay informed with MarketBeat's real-time news. Export data to Excel for personal analysis. Sign in to your free account to enjoy these benefits In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies. Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more. Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter. Sign in to your free account to enjoy all that MarketBeat has to offer. Sign In Create Account Your Email Address: Email Address Required Your Password: Password Required Log In or Sign in with Facebook Sign in with Google Forgot your password? Your Email Address: Please enter your email address. Please enter a valid email address Choose a Password: Please enter your password. Your password must be at least 8 characters long and contain at least 1 number, 1 letter, and 1 special character. Create My Account (Free) or Sign in with Facebook Sign in with Google By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
There are 10 speakers on the call. Operator00:00:00Good day, and welcome to QuantumScape's Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. John Sager, QuantumScape's Vice President of Capital Markets and FP and A, you may now begin your conference. Speaker 100:00:15Thank you, operator. Good afternoon and thank you to everyone for joining QuantumScape's Q3 2023 earnings call. To supplement today's discussion, Please go to our IR website at ir.quantoscape.com to view our shareholder letter. Before we begin, I want to call your attention to the Safe Harbor provision for forward looking statements that is posted on our website as part of our quarterly update. Forward looking statements generally relate to future events, future technology progress or future financial or operating performance. Speaker 100:00:46Our expectations and beliefs regarding these matters may not materialize. Actual results and financial periods are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. There are risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the content of our forward looking statements for the reasons that we cite in our shareholder letter, Form 10 ks and other SEC filings, including uncertainties posed by the difficulty in predicting future outcomes. Joining us today will be QuantumScape's Co Founder, CEO and Chairman, Jagdeep Singh our CFO, Kevin Hetrick and a new addition to our team, Doctor. Sivva Sivaram, President. Speaker 100:01:26With that, I'd like to turn the call over to JP. Speaker 200:01:29Thanks, John. I'd like to begin today's call by introducing our newly hired President, Doctor. Siva Sivaram. Siva holds a PhD in Materials Science and brings extensive experience in high volume manufacturing of advanced Technology Products, most recently serving as President at WESN Digital, a global leader in solid state and magnetic data storage. Before that, He held leadership positions at pioneer and technology companies including SanDisk, Matrix Semiconductor and Intel. Speaker 200:01:58We're thrilled to have him on board. I'll start by covering our customer prototype testing. As we reported last year, we shipped our first a0 prototype sales to prospective customers in Q4 2022 with the goal of providing a proof of concept demonstration of a 24 layer anode free solid state Lithium Metal Battery Cell. We can now share that our top performing A0 prototype cell in our automated OEMs battery testing labs achieved over 1,000 full cycle equivalents with over 95% discharge energy retention using customer specified test conditions of C over 3 charge and CO2 discharge with our standard temperature and pressure conditions and 100% depth of discharge. I'd like to point out that this is the best performing cell and we have work to do on aspects such as reliability. Speaker 200:02:49Nonetheless, this is an exceptional result. We're not aware of any automotive format lithium metal battery that has shown such high discharge energy retention over a comparable cycle count at room temperature and modest pressure regardless of sea rate. We believe that no competing electrolyte, solid or liquid, has demonstrated sufficient stability with lithium metal to achieve this and that this result sets a new high watermark for lithium metal battery performance. This result is especially meaningful because the a0 prototype has the same number of layers as our production intense cell and uses our proprietary cell format. Together with the higher loading capital results reported in our Q1 2023 shareholder letter, We've now separately demonstrated 3 key aspects of our production intense cell design, 24 layers, higher cathode loading and our new cell format. Speaker 200:03:46When these aspects are combined, along with improvements of packaging efficiency and manufacturing process controls and automation for improved reliability, informs the core of our first commercial product, QSE5. The cover photo of this quarter's shared letter shows a mock up of our QSE5 cell format. It's important to keep in mind that since QSE5 will have higher loading cathodes and more efficient packaging than our A0 prototype cell, it will sustain higher current densities and be built with tighter margins, resulted in more stress on the cell. We must also continue to work on producing these cells in large volumes with high quality and reliability. These factors present significant challenges. Speaker 200:04:30Nevertheless, we believe this remarkable result makes clear said that our technology can achieve disruptive performance at commercial and temporary accounts, further increasing our confidence in the transformative potential of our technology and product roadmap. Next, a word about our customer engagements. Right now, Our primary focus is on QSE5 development with the goal of enabling superior performance on a range of potential automotive applications Across motorsport, passenger and commercial vehicles, including motorcycles, cars, trucks and SUVs. As we reported last quarter, we're collaborating closely with a prospective launch customer in the automotive sector for QSE5. While the scale of this initial application is by design small, it represents an important vehicle proof of concept that we believe has high visibility and the potential to lead to other programs in the future. Speaker 200:05:29We're pleased with the progress the joint teams have made so far on module and pack integration and system design, The significant work remains. For example, we continue to refine and finalize the design parameters of QSE5, which will determine the specific thermal and mechanical behavior of the cell. Beyond automotive, We remain engaged with prospective customers in the consumer electronics sector. And in Q3, we entered into a technology evaluation agreement with a leading global consumer electronics player. We believe the ability of our solid state platform to maintain good cycling performance with 0 externally applied pressure meets a key design requirement for these applications. Speaker 200:06:13The single layer sister cells that we first reported on in our Q3 2022 Shareholder Letter have now achieved between 15,021,000 cycles to approximately 80% discharge energy retention with 0 externally applied pressure. Next, an update on our product development. Our planned first commercial product is QSE5, which uses the proprietary format first demonstrated in A0 prototypes last year. This innovative format is a hybrid of conventional pouch and prismatic cell designs to address the uniaxial expansion of lithium metal as it plates and strips during charging and discharging. We call this novel format FlexFrame. Speaker 200:06:56A key technical goal for the year is to improve cell packaging efficiency relative to the A0 prototype cells we ship to prospective customers in 2022. This involves reducing the space taken up by the inactive material and flex frame package as well as increasing the amount of active material in the cell, which we expect will enable the final commercial design to reach our energy density targets. When comparing the A0 prototype To our current B0 design, the B0s are designed to pack the same number of layers with more energy per layer into a slimmer cell package. We plan to provide a detailed look at the innovative flex flame architecture in an upcoming webinar. Now let me hand it over to Simba for an update on our manufacturing scale. Speaker 300:07:45Thanks, David. I'll begin with an update on Speaker 200:07:48our Raptor process. As a reminder, Raptor Speaker 300:07:52is designed to deliver up to 3 times RASM instrument throughput using similar equipment to our last generation process, while applying less energy per separator. In Q3, we began process qualification of Raptor equipment on schedule. Process qualification involves producing films, gathering data to characterize their quality and consistency and using that feedback to refine our process specs. We are pleased with the early returns from the qualification testing. And while there is work remaining to dial in this process, we continue to target deployment of Raptor by the end of the year. Speaker 300:08:32We also continue to make progress on our next generation COBRA process, which is planned to support higher volume B sample production from our consolidated QL0 pre pilot line. Along with separated heat treatment equipment, in Q3, we took delivery, installed and commissioned key pieces of equipment related to process automation such as unit cell assembly equipment. More automation not only increases our cell production capacity, but also reduces manual handling, which is a common source of run to run variation and tends to adversely impact reliability. We plan to continue process development and automation deployment to enable higher quality, consistency and Throughput as we build out our manufacturing capability. Overall, we are pleased with our manufacturing scale and progress, But more work remains, including continuing to drive our defect reduction and quality improvement initiatives, Integrating advanced metrology and data collection and developing additional process automation. Speaker 300:09:45With that, let me turn things over to Kevin for an update on our financial outlook. Speaker 400:09:52Thanks, Eva. 3rd quarter 2023 capital expenditures were $18,000,000 GAAP operating expenses were $121,000,000 Cash operating expenses defined as operating expenses less stock based compensation and depreciation for $64,000,000 For the full year 2023, we maintain our guidance on cash operating expenses of $225,000,000 to $275,000,000 and revised our CapEx guidance to $75,000,000 to $100,000,000 Approximately one 3rd of the reduction in expected CapEx spend is due to realized savings. Examples include successful value engineering, negotiated price reductions and completion of certain projects under budget. The remaining approximate 2 thirds is due to shifts in timing, which can be broken down into 3 broad categories: certain items we deferred because we had additional schedule buffer items where we previously forecasted more front loaded payment timing than what will actually be required and updates to aspects of our equipment strategy. Despite these changes in the timing of CapEx, We continue to target low volume B samples in 2024 and higher volume B samples in 2025. Speaker 400:11:07During Q3, our CapEx primarily went toward facility and equipment spend for our consolidated QS0 pre pilot line, including for our Raptor process. For the remainder of the year, our CapEx will continue to be predominantly allocated toward QS0. During the quarter, We raised $300,000,000 in gross proceeds from our public fall on offering. We ended Q3 with over $1,100,000,000 in liquidity and continue to look for opportunities to optimize our spending and be prudent with our strong balance sheet. We now forecast that our cash runway will extend into 2026. Speaker 400:11:43Any additional funds raised from capital markets activity, including under our ATM perspective supplement would further extend this cash runway. Longer term, our capital requirements will be a function of our industrialization business model, which we believe could reflect a mix of wholly owned production, Joint Venture and Licensing Relationships. With that, I'll hand things over to Jagdeep for a final word Speaker 200:12:06on our strategic outlook. Thanks, Kevin. Fundamentally, our focus for 2023 is simple, turn the corner from prototype to product. Our key milestones are all aimed at advancing product development to build a sufficient level of technical and manufacturing maturity to enable initial production of the QSE5 cell. With just a few months remaining in the year, we're maintaining aggressive near term schedules and remain focused on bringing a potentially disruptive first product to market in the near future. Speaker 200:12:37But strategically, our mission is bigger than a series of near term objectives. We've been pursuing a next generation electric vehicle battery for over a decade. And with a mission as challenging and important as this, Long term thinking is indispensable. Moreover, the market opportunity for our technology platform is massive, potentially in the 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars annually for decades to come. With that in mind, this year we've also taken steps to strengthen our long term strategic position. Speaker 200:13:07For example, this quarter, we seized the opportunity to fortify our balance sheet, extending our forecasted cash runway into 2026 and securing funding for pivotal development and deployment milestones, including higher volume B samples based on our COBRA separator process, which if achieved would have a transformative effect on our business. We've also built on our strong customer relationships and deepened our engagement with a prospective launch customer for our first product. And we continue to add manufacturing experience and Technical Excellence to our team at every level. At the close of Q3, we feel prepared to face the inevitable and innumerable has short term challenges on the way to our goal because we've laid a strong foundation for long term success. We look forward to reporting our challenges and the successes and the quarters to Speaker 100:13:57come. Thanks, Jagdeep. We'll begin today's Q and A portion with a few questions we've received from investors or that I believe investors would be interested in. Jagdeep, we'll start with you. And I wanted to ask about our newly hired President, Doctor. Speaker 100:14:09Sivasevaram. Could you tell me a little bit about your expectations for him in his new role and why you felt somebody with his background and experience was a good fit for us at this stage of our development. Speaker 200:14:20Sure. So we're thrilled to have Siva join the team. We've said that our main goal for the year was to turn the corner from prototype to product. In support of that, we've been working on the scale up of the Processes, Equipment and Automation associated with higher volume, higher quality production. A key part of this is, of course, having the expertise needed to do this. Speaker 200:14:41We wanted to bolster our senior management team with someone who brought not only super high volume production experience, but experience in sophisticated manufacturing processes Such as those found in the semiconductor or Mandaig storage industries. But we don't think we could have found a better fit than with CIBA, Who was President at Western Digital, ran 1 of the world's largest data storage companies with $18,000,000,000 in revenue in 2022 and something like a 40% share of the hard drive market. The company shipped literally millions of units per year and these units involved highly advanced manufacturing processes and Supply Chains. For example, as you might know, modern disk drives have magnetic heads that float on the order of 5 nanometers above the surface of a platter is spinning at several 1000 RPM and do this repeatedly and with very high reliability. He was also a pioneer with multi layer semiconductor technology, Which now routinely achieves over 200 layers. Speaker 200:15:39We think all of this experience will be invaluable as we scale up our equipment and increase our quality and reliability. Okay. And now a question for Siva. Speaker 100:15:48Siva, now that you've been with QuantumScape for a couple of months, I wanted to get your initial impressions as well as your assessment. Why do you think QuantumScape's technology is scalable and what needs to be done to make that happen? Speaker 300:15:59Thanks, John. It's been a very active and involved last couple of months. Even before I came to the company, I spent a lot of time developing an understanding of the electrochemistry, the material science, the thermodynamics Of QuantumScapes Technology. So now that I'm here, what has impressed me first and foremost is the quality and commitment of the people. The depth of expertise and experience that's here within QuantumScape. Speaker 300:16:28I see the rigor that we have in the development and the collection and management Speaker 200:16:34of data that gives me confidence in Speaker 300:16:36the company's core competencies. It's very interesting to note the similarities to my prior semiconductor and magnetic storage experience, whether it is in hard drive assembly, and we can get to Bakken. On battery manufacturing, as we scale to higher volumes, the key to scaling is defect reduction, Process Control and a high level of automation. I've also seen that the ecosystem at QuantumScape is very well developed provides the incoming materials, equipment, setting up a very robust supply chain. And the depth of interaction with top tier customer. Speaker 300:17:14They have studied feedback. This sets the tone for continuous improvement as we ramp. Overall, the company and the technology are well poised for scaling. Speaker 100:17:26Great. Thanks so much, Siva. Devin, turning to you, a question submitted by one of our investors. Can you provide some additional context on the $300,000,000 follow on offering closed in August? How does this fit into your long term approach to capital management? Speaker 400:17:41Thank you, John, for the question on behalf of the investor. In the first half of this year, we hit several product and manufacturing milestones on the path to commercialization. We believe that the time was right for a follow on equity is based on the product manufacturing and customer momentum of the company. On the product development front, recall that in our Q2 shareholder letter, We shared higher cathode performance higher cathode loading performance data and shipped unit cells with these cathodes to multiple partners. On the manufacturing front, in Q2, we completed site acceptance for our Raptor equipment, tracking to our year end goal to deploy the fast separator process. Speaker 400:18:22And on the customer front, we had announced that we engaged with a prospective launch customer in the automotive space to bring QSE5 to market. So we felt like we were on strong footing on a number of fronts and wanted to ensure that our capital run rate would extend into 2026, which funds the build out of our QS0 COBRA line and production of our higher volume B samples targeted at the end of 2025. Speaker 100:18:45Okay, great. Thanks, Kevin, so much for that insight. Jagmeet, with approximately 2 months left in the year, can you summarize for investors How we're tracking against our 2023 goals that we laid out for investors in February, specifically what work remains to be done? Speaker 200:19:00Sure, John. So at the beginning of the year, we laid out 4 key goals for the year that we thought were critical to helping turn the corner from prototype to production. The first was to increase the loading of the cathode to approximately 3,000,000 amp hours per centimeter squared to approximately 5,000,000 amp hours per centimeter squared to store more energy in the cell. We reported on the Q2 call that we achieved this higher loading cathode and in fact shift unit cell prototypes with this new cathode to customers. The second key goal was to improve the efficiency of packaging. Speaker 200:19:33And on this front, our new FlexFrame package incorporates a number of improvements from narrower edge margins, the thinner contractors and thinner adhesive layers. The other two goals were production related and having to do with our Raptor process and reliability. And I'll turn it Speaker 300:19:49over to Siva to talk about those. Thanks, Jaipik. The 3rd goal was to install and deploy our new Raptor process. We have installed and qualified the Raptor equipment. We are starting to produce high quality films and are optimizing the process to meet our performance targets. Speaker 300:20:06We are making good progress towards rapid deployment by the end of the year. And finally on reliability, we have undertaken and completed over a dozen initiatives to reduce the activity and are now focused on process enhancements that we believe will take our reliability up to a new level. Of course, reliability is never done. Requires an ongoing effort to readout and eliminate potential failure modes, especially as we introduce new improved scaled up processes. Speaker 100:20:38Okay. Thanks so much, guys. We're now ready to begin the live portion of today's call. Operator, please open up the line for questions. Operator00:20:47Thank One moment please for your first question. Your first question comes from the line of Douglas Jatin with Evercore ISI. Your line Speaker 400:21:08is open. Hi, Jagdeep and Kevin, and welcome, Subha. Appreciate the nice update here. Can I just quickly ask for a little more detail on the B sample timeline, specifically if you can confirm when the timeline for production with Raptor looks to be right now? Previously, I believe you said about 18 months after the A sample, which would imply the B sample timing around mid-twenty 4. Speaker 400:21:28This release only quotes calendar year 2024. So Is there anything else you can tell us on the timing for those first B0 samples, given that it seems the Raptor certification and testing process is coming along well? Speaker 200:21:41Yes. As Sila mentioned, we're pleased with the way the Raptor qualification process is going. The equipment has been installed and we're qualifying the process as we speak for deployment data this year. And we do believe we're still targeting 2024 for The low volume B samples. When we provided the 18 month guidance, that, of course, was General approximate guidance. Speaker 200:22:07But I think the targets that we're still tracking to are in 2024 is when we hope to have when we are targeting to have the first The low volume V0 samples. Subsequently to that, we expect to have higher volume V samples using a new cold draw process before the end of 2025. So those are the 2 key milestones for us coming up next year and the year after, are using the Raptor process to introduce low volume B samples in 2024 and the COBRA process, which is even faster as you know, to introduce the higher volume B samples in 2025. Okay. Okay. Speaker 200:22:43That's helpful. And then just a Speaker 400:22:45quick one on Toyota's Solid state news over the last couple of days. The company is claiming a doubling of EV range with their solution. There is no new tech here, right? They're simply adding in significantly more kilowatt hours, due to the smaller space required in a solid state design, to achieve that stated range. Is that your understanding? Speaker 400:23:04Thanks, Speaker 200:23:05Dean. Yes. So first of all, I want to say that we're genuinely pleased to see a company like Toyota endorsing solid state batteries as the future of EVs. We obviously agree we've been on solid state for a long time. Having said that, Toyota has announced that it's using a sulfide based approach, which does come with some challenges. Speaker 200:23:24We've done a lot of work on sulfides ourselves here. If you look at our patent portfolio, a number of those patents are in the sulfide space. And one of the key challenges with sulfide based approaches is low cycle life that results from poor electrochemical stability and the Tends to form lithium metal dendrites. Now if the dendrite problem isn't addressed, then there are sort of 2 basic options. 1 is to revert back to a Carbon or silicon based host material as opposed to lithium metal, but then that results in reduced energy density and power density relative to lithium metal anode. Speaker 200:23:57And the other option is to run under what we consider to be compromised test conditions, I. E, elevated temperatures or very high pressures or low rates of charge and discharge or a short cycle life. So All of those approaches we think make the approach unsuitable for commercial vehicles. We're not aware of data from anyone demonstrates that these fundamental challenges of lithium metal bainite formation in sulfide based systems has been addressed at room temperature and mild pressures. But if they like us, we welcome seeing it. Speaker 200:24:32And of course, the data we shared today, if you look at the first chart in our shareholder letter, That shows data from our A024 layer prototype cells, which of course we shipped in 2022, that achieved 1,000 cycles with a remarkable 95% capacity retention, which as we mentioned in the call, we believe is a high watermark for cycle life and automotive format, solid lithium metal batteries. So we think the data is very clear on the capabilities of this approach. Operator00:25:15Your next question comes from the line of Winnie Dong with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Speaker 500:25:21Hi. Thanks so much for answering your questions. I was wondering if you can elaborate on the challenges being written about in your shareholder letter, More specifically on combining the high capital loading with more efficient packaging and then in the new QSC V format. Essentially, what are the hurdles that need to be overcome for this combination to be Speaker 200:25:49Yes. It's a good question. So as we pointed out in the letter, if you look at the differences between the A0 we shipped last year and the QSE 5 that we intend to ship next year. There's a few key areas where that account for the biggest differences. One is the layer count. Speaker 200:26:07I'm sorry, the layer count is in fact the same. We're shipping the QSE5 will be a 24 layer cell And the A Zeros that we shipped last year were also 24 to ourselves. So we've shown we can do that. The second thing that the QSE-five needs to have is a Higher loading cathode, so specifically roughly 5 milliamp hour per centimeter squared loading cathode. The A-0s we shipped had a 3,000,000 amp hour capo. Speaker 200:26:37And we showed earlier this year results from 5,000,000 of our cathodes. I think it was on the Q2 call. And we've since shipped those sells with those higher living capitals to customers. The 3rd piece is we need to put all this into our new, more efficient FlexFrame Package. And we've mentioned on the call that we've already made progress towards that in the form of reduced Margins and thinner adhesive layers and current vector layers, all those we think we'll play into that. Speaker 200:27:14So when you take those three things that we've demonstrated separately and combine them together and then add to that The improvements that we're talking about with reliability that come from process control and more automation, you end up with is the core of what is QSE Vios. I think the way we think about it is from a risk standpoint, we believe we've demonstrated Many of the key aspects of the QRC5 sales already separately, and sort of if you used software technology at the unit cell level unit test level. And now we just need to bring them together into an integrated cell. So it's more of an integration task, But we now when we have QSE5, then it is a task of developing fundamentally new features. So that's kind of where we are on QSE5. Speaker 500:28:10Thank you. That's really helpful. And then on the work with the prospective launch customer for QSC V, is there any additional color you can provide in terms of Initial customer feedback or testing feedback as far example, are the design parameters that this customer is looking at in line with less or more stringent than the gold standards that you're targeting in terms of self performance? Speaker 200:28:39Yes, that's a great question. So, one of the criteria we had to pick this initial launch customer was we wanted a customer that was excited about the QSE5 sale as is, because obviously we don't want to have to go redesign the sale or change the form factor Or do anything else that could delay our time to market. So we're pleased that this particular customer is in fact is excited about the capabilities of QSE5. And I think we reported on the QSE5 capabilities in our last earnings call Where we showed a landscape map of energy versus power, and we believe that QSE5 occupies A unique space in that landscape. The other thing about this customer is that the volume needs that they have, We believe we can satisfy from our QS0 facility here in San Jose. Speaker 200:29:31And then the final thing about this customer is that The level of maturity they're expecting is consistent with what we believe we'll have with our higher volume B samples. So on all three of those metrics, Volume levels, maturity levels and product functionality. This is a very good match for what we have. And that's why we're excited, that's why both sides, Frontier, are excited about its capability, and we look forward to continue to work with them closely. Speaker 500:30:00Thank you so much. Speaker 200:30:02Absolutely. Operator00:30:04Sorry, your next question comes from the line of Ben Kallo with Baird. Your line is Speaker 600:30:11open. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Siva, congrats on the new role. Just maybe Steve, with your new role, we heard about what's similar To your previous roles, what do you think the difficulties are compared to your previous roles. Speaker 600:30:38And I have a follow-up. Speaker 300:30:41Thanks, Ben. My prior role has always been taking advanced technologies into very high volumes. How do we integrate the technology into materials, processes and equipment and scale it up? And I have done this several times in the past. When I came into QuantumScape, that's exactly what I am Hoping to accomplish very soon. Speaker 300:31:07The technology is in a great place. The customer demand is there. The market is very large. It's up to us to now scale what we have into a product that we can deliver to customers And I'm looking forward to that challenge. Speaker 600:31:26Doug, Deepa and Kevin, congrats on the raise, those sparks. Just as you deploy capital and you have partners come How has it changed as we move forward and you test out stuff, Our partners were willing to invest capital so you could save the money or how do we think about this going forward with your capital deployment? Speaker 400:31:56Yes, Ben, thank you for the question. First, on the $300,000,000 gross proceeds raise, We felt the timing was right based on all the momentum that we had during the year. On the product with the announcement of the QSE5, The manufacturing process with the Raptor equipment in having passed that acceptance and then all the customer transaction all the customer traction that Jagdeep mentioned where we're working with a prospective launch customer in the automotive space for that initial high visibility small volume launch. Moving forward, I would also highlight that in prior calls, We are open to multiple different business models in the fullness of time. We see options with wholly owned capacity as the case with QSCRO, joint venture relationships, which you're well familiar with as well as licensing relationships. Speaker 400:32:54And separately, as we've also discussed on prior calls, there's a lot of momentum behind investments in clean energy, specifically Closed loop domestic supply chains here in the United States. Those are also things which we track those opportunities to be as capital light And efficient with the capital that we do have as possible. Speaker 600:33:20Maybe the last one, I'll sneak in. That's with everything going on, I don't know, UAW, everything in the world. Have you seen any of your partners Like pullback from relationships and timelines or partnerships with the U. S? Speaker 400:33:42I would almost say the opposite. I think with turmoil in the world and So the growing realization for the importance for the penetration of electric vehicles, both direct and indirect jobs They can bring the importance to the environment that we actually see more excitement around the space. And then within that, what differential battery technology like we're working with it has the prompts to completely shift out the power and energy frontier as our QSE5, While eliminating as manufactured 1 of the 2 components, it's a pretty amazing thing and we remain excited and as we've talked about, that's just The start of what our technology platform promises. Speaker 600:34:29Thank you, Operator00:34:39Your next question comes from the line of Jordan Levy with Truett Securities. Your line is open. Speaker 700:34:48Hi, team. This is Henry on for Jordan. I just want to firstly touch on the CapEx savings you all have realized So far, I don't expect to realize by the end of the year. Just want to touch on, I guess, any color you can add Around some of the different puts and takes there with that material cost kind of coming down, more efficient installations through processes and is are there any learnings you guys are going to take or can take into 2024 and beyond? Speaker 400:35:15It's a good question. Philosophically, we Think about this in terms of big projects and small projects. We regularly get together as a team and think through things that we can do Differently or smarter to save CapEx is the same as this true with OpEx. And then also, I think the whole company has rallied around the idea of Spending more smartly and more effectively. And we also encourage and then publicly celebrate ideas that Folks bring forward that we then put into actions. Speaker 400:35:48So that's and then when you break it down, it's really That one third of savings that I referenced in my script is actually broken down into a lot of smaller projects, but it's definitely credit to the broader company for realizing. I think it's also important as we transition from a Product Development Company to one of manufacturing that has to be in our very DNA. Speaker 700:36:16That's great to hear. And then just a quick follow-up on some of the recent graphite export news out of China. I'm Just wondering if you guys are seeing at all any a boost in interest in your technology with some of these geopolitical risks around battery materials kind of Starting to play out a little bit. And do Speaker 800:36:31you think this will have Speaker 700:36:32a pretty large effect or pretty minimal in the long term kind of demand for solid state versus some of the other factors like Higher energy density and the performance enhancements. Speaker 400:36:43Henry, terrific question. From an industry point of view, Our design eliminates the graphite anode material from the cell, which this has two advantages. As you point out, it eliminates a supply chain bottleneck and associated risks of securing supply in a crowded market. And second, as you also alluded to, in eliminating the in house material, we realized benefits in terms of energy density and charge time. Of course, to do this, You will need a highly stable solid state separator, which is our core IP. Speaker 700:37:18Thank you, guys. Operator00:37:21Your next question comes from the line of Chris Snyder with UBS. Your line is open. Speaker 900:37:28Thank you. I wanted to ask on the A0 24 layer prototype sell and specifically that first Shar in the shareholder letter, which shows the test results from a customer battery lab. Clearly, really strong results there. But the letter does note that this was the best performing sell. So maybe could you just frame this a little bit more for us, whether it's kind of Was this one sell out of how many? Speaker 900:37:58Anything around just the delta between this particular sell and the rest? Was it a big outlier? Are they all generally similar? Any way just kind of frame that more. Thank you. Speaker 200:38:13Sure. Happy to do that. First of all, as we've said many times in earnings calls this year, we have work to do on reliability. So that's a key area that we're focused on to make the cells more and more reliable. So every cell works as well as the best cell. Speaker 200:38:28Having said that though, with the caveat about reliability, the capacity retention curve that you're seeing here is actually very similar to what we see for most of the cells that we've shipped. In other words, the slope of this curve is really very similar across the cells. And what this cell shows is that when we make the cells with a sufficiently low level of deep activity, we end up with Really, as you point out, remarkable level of performance because 95% capacity retention at 1,000 cycles, To our knowledge, it's unheard of for lithium metal cells with a solid or liquid. And as you point out, this test was run in our automotive OEM partners lab, right. So it's their test using their equipment, using their test protocols. Speaker 200:39:25And we're just really excited that this demonstrates. This is really the purpose, as you know, of the A sample is to demonstrate the capability of the core technology. And then of course, when you get to B Sample, that's when you have to get to things like implementing that sample or that capability with production processes. And that's when the reliability and so on become more important factors. So the short answer to your question is The capacity retention curve that we're showing here is very similar to what we see across the board. Speaker 200:39:59We do have work to do on reliability to make sure every cell goes the distance. But in terms of the overall behavior, we're really excited by this result. It shows the inherent capability in our view Of what a lithium metal 0 anode design is capable of. Speaker 900:40:17Yes, happy to hear that and really Appreciate all that color. Maybe for my second question, I wanted to ask on the consumer electronics. QuantumScape, historically, you guys have been focused more on the auto market. This year, you've talked more about consumer electronics The letter talked about a technology evaluation agreement with a leading electronics player. So I guess my question is, do you think the company's first commercial products that generates revenue is more likely to be in auto or consumer electronics? Speaker 900:40:59Thank you. Speaker 200:41:00Yes. Thanks for the question and the opportunity to clarify this. 1st of all, I want to be crystal clear. Our focus has been and continues to be and remains automotive. That is our primary focus. Speaker 200:41:16That is the space within which this initial launch customer that we've been talking about is in, and those are the partnerships that we are working very closely with. We talk about consumer, however, because We believe what we have is a technology platform. We're getting a lot of interest from a lot of different sectors. And we believe it behooves us, we Almost owing to our investors to explore all those options, keep them in the running. But we don't in any way intend to let that distract us from our primary focus, which is, of course, automotive. Speaker 200:41:50There are several reasons for this. One, of course, is the fact that if you get too defocused, then you Can end up in a situation where you do nothing well. We got to do one thing and do it really well. But the other is that sector we think is by far the largest In terms of size and growth potential. So the way I would summarize it is that Our focus remains unchanged on the ongoing space of our primary market. Speaker 200:42:17However, we've said before that we have a I think we called it a Single track dual purpose design. What we mean by that is the same product in this form factor, we think has relevance To not only automotive, but also consumer. And so we by continuing on that single track, We can serve both purposes up to a point, at which point we'll have to obviously, if we're doing an actual consumer product, we'll have to make some modifications. But for the time being, we see no distraction and we continue to focus on automotive while Working with some of the consumer partners as well. Thank you, Jagdeep. Speaker 200:42:59Appreciate that. Of course. Operator00:43:03Your next question comes from the line of Gabe Daoud with TD Cowen. Your line is open. Speaker 800:43:12Hey, Jackie, Kevin and team, thanks for taking my questions. I was hoping we could maybe Just going back to the first chart that Chris noted in the shareholder letter. I guess I'd just be curious as to why the Prospective launch customer ran the test at a Cthree, Ctwo charge discharge. Just kind of curious why they would run like a 1C? Speaker 200:43:36Yes. So it's a good question. Obviously, they've added CO3 CO2 because that's the test that they wanted to run. We as you know, many of our tests, we report 1C, 1C. We do that for two reasons. Speaker 200:43:481 is 1C, 1C is even more aggressive, because it charges and discharges the entire battery in an hour. So it's going to be hard to discharge an actual battery in a car in an hour. You have to really run down 300 miles of charge of more in 1 hour, which is hard to do. And in terms of charging up the battery, 1 hour charge is typically considered to be a supercharged level of charging. And most automotive OEMs most EVs are not charged On a supercharger for every single charge. Speaker 200:44:21We do it that way because, A, we think our technology is capable of it and B, It allows us to collect data much more quickly, so we can have a faster cycle time, which of course, as you know, is key to learning and improving and continuing to execute. Having said that, from a customer standpoint, CO3 may in fact be more typical of what a typical OEM sees For a charge rate, it's a 3 hour charge. So if you plug in your car into your garage overnight, it might even be lower than that, but that's kind of what they I can't speak for the customer, but apparently that's what they have standardized on, along with a CO2 discharge. So our what we're doing here, again, is simply reporting data That was provided to us by this automotive OEM customer. They get to decide the test conditions under which they run, and that's why we reported this. Speaker 200:45:12What we think is notable is just the capacity retention that we see here With a 24 layer cell is really remarkable. And we mentioned this because, as you know, when we went public a few years ago, one of the questions some people had was, Great. You guys have shown some fantastic data at a single layer cell level. Can you replicate this in multilayer cells? And what this data demonstrates to us Is that not only can we do this in multi layer cells, in this case, 24 layer cells, But that 24 day sale is, of course, the same day account that we're targeting for our first commercial product, USC5. Speaker 200:45:53And at that 24 year level, we're seeing what we believe is industry leading performance in terms of capacity retention compared to any other lithium metal cell that we've seen. So we think it's an important data point and we thought it was worth sharing with investors, Especially because it was generated in a customer's lab by the customer using their own test protocols and their own test commissions. Speaker 800:46:21Definitely makes sense. Thanks, Jagdeep, for the clarification and color. And I guess just a quick follow-up. You noted the layer count and obviously a goal this year is just the higher cathode loading. Just curious, I think last quarter you guys showed Higher cathode loading cell that was maybe a couple of layers. Speaker 800:46:41So I was curious if there's any update around that Performance in Cycle Life and capacity retention. And I guess when could we expect to see some data With the 2 combined, meaning higher layer count with the higher capital loading? Thanks, guys. Speaker 200:46:58Yes. That's a great question and that's exactly the task that we're currently focused on is to take this 24 layer cell that we showed, that we shipped last The data from which we're showing in this letter, add to it the higher loading cathode, add to it the more efficient packaging, as I mentioned, the Thinner adhesive layers, narrow margins at the edges, thinner contractors, add to it some improvements we're making to reliability And then that becomes our QSE5. So the answer to the question of when we expect to have that is next year sometime in 2024. And I can say that the in general, the testing results from the higher loading cathodes are similar to what we've seen before, which is basically we have work to do on reliability, but the overall Behavior outside of that in terms of capacity retention and fast charge is quite good. In fact, I think we published fast charge results In the last earnings letters, so the operator is there for you to look at. Speaker 200:48:01But the basic idea is in 2024, We plan to basically combine this 24 layer cell with the high loading cathode, the more efficient packaging And the improvements to reliability that we're currently putting into our process. Speaker 400:48:18Yes. And Jamie, just We did publish fast charge data in Q2 letter. And then also it is more capital efficient to do Development work on a smaller layer count as possible. So it's just another example of us being as effective and prudent with capital as possible. Speaker 300:48:38Got it. Speaker 800:48:38Thanks for that, Kevin. Thanks, guys. Speaker 200:48:40Yes. Good question, TFC. Operator00:48:44There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call to Jagdeep for closing remarks. Speaker 200:48:52Okay. With that, I'd like to thank you all for joining us. I'd also like to thank our team for their excellent work this quarter and of course, thank our shareholders for their continued support of our mission. I look forward to sharing more as we continue ahead. Operator00:49:05This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.Read morePowered by