Pacific Booker Minerals (CVE:BKM) and Great Thunder Gold (CVE:GTG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.
Profitability
This table compares Pacific Booker Minerals and Great Thunder Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets |
---|
Pacific Booker Minerals | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Great Thunder Gold | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Pacific Booker Minerals and Great Thunder Gold's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio |
---|
Pacific Booker Minerals | N/A | N/A | N/A | C($0.04) | -47.37 |
Great Thunder Gold | N/A | N/A | N/A | C($0.02) | -21.82 |
Pacific Booker Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Thunder Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Analyst Recommendations
This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Booker Minerals and Great Thunder Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score |
---|
Pacific Booker Minerals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Great Thunder Gold | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Summary
Great Thunder Gold beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 2 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.