Pancontinental Resources (CVE:PUC) and North Arrow Minerals (CVE:NAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and earnings.
Profitability
This table compares Pancontinental Resources and North Arrow Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets |
---|
Pancontinental Resources | N/A | N/A | N/A |
North Arrow Minerals | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Valuation and Earnings
This table compares Pancontinental Resources and North Arrow Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio |
---|
Pancontinental Resources | C$5,905.00 | 7,438.22 | C$-2,440,150.00 | C($0.01) | -18.00 |
North Arrow Minerals | N/A | N/A | N/A | C($0.01) | -17.50 |
North Arrow Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pancontinental Resources. Pancontinental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North Arrow Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Analyst Ratings
This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Pancontinental Resources and North Arrow Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score |
---|
Pancontinental Resources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
North Arrow Minerals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Summary
North Arrow Minerals beats Pancontinental Resources on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.