Free Trial

Asia Strategic (ASIA) Competitors

GBX 4.75 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/2/2026 03:19 PM Eastern

ASIA vs. WIL, WEY, OBOR, MLVN, and GFHG

Should you buy Asia Strategic stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Asia Strategic with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Asia Strategic include Wilmington (WIL), Wey Education (WEY), Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (OBOR), Malvern International (MLVN), and Grand Fortune High Grade (GFHG). These companies are all part of the "education & training services" industry.

How does Asia Strategic compare to Wilmington?

Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) and Wilmington (LON:WIL) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Wilmington has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wilmington, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A
Wilmington£106.60M2.18£18.57M£12.0221.63

Wilmington has a net margin of 10.68% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%. Wilmington's return on equity of 9.96% beat Asia Strategic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asia Strategic-20.83% N/A -8.22%
Wilmington 10.68%9.96%7.72%

In the previous week, Wilmington had 14 more articles in the media than Asia Strategic. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Wilmington and 0 mentions for Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Wilmington's score of 0.00 indicating that Asia Strategic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asia Strategic Neutral
Wilmington Neutral

Asia Strategic has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wilmington has a beta of 0.304, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Wilmington has a consensus price target of GBX 451.67, indicating a potential upside of 73.72%. Given Wilmington's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wilmington is more favorable than Asia Strategic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Asia Strategic
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Wilmington
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

62.4% of Wilmington shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.2% of Asia Strategic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Wilmington shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wilmington beats Asia Strategic on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Asia Strategic compare to Wey Education?

Wey Education (LON:WEY) and Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Wey Education has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wey Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wey Education£8.36M0.00N/A£0.60N/A
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A

In the previous week, Wey Education's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asia Strategic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wey Education Neutral
Asia Strategic Neutral

Wey Education has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wey EducationN/A N/A N/A
Asia Strategic -20.83%N/A -8.22%

Summary

Wey Education beats Asia Strategic on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Asia Strategic compare to Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)?

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) (LON:OBOR) and Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asia Strategic'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) Neutral
Asia Strategic Neutral

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)N/AN/AN/A-£547.70N/A
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A

Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)N/A N/A N/A
Asia Strategic -20.83%N/A -8.22%

Summary

Asia Strategic beats Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L) on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Asia Strategic compare to Malvern International?

Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) and Malvern International (LON:MLVN) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Asia Strategic has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Malvern International has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Asia Strategic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Malvern International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asia Strategic Neutral
Malvern International Neutral

5.0% of Malvern International shares are held by institutional investors. 42.2% of Asia Strategic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Malvern International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Malvern International has a net margin of -8.50% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%. Malvern International's return on equity of 39.68% beat Asia Strategic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asia Strategic-20.83% N/A -8.22%
Malvern International -8.50%39.68%N/A

Malvern International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Asia Strategic. Asia Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Malvern International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A
Malvern International£17.79M0.40-£245.04K£0.3855.87

Summary

Malvern International beats Asia Strategic on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Asia Strategic compare to Grand Fortune High Grade?

Asia Strategic (LON:ASIA) and Grand Fortune High Grade (LON:GFHG) are both small-cap consumer defensive companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Grand Fortune High Grade has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Asia Strategic's net margin of -20.83%. Asia Strategic's return on equity of 0.00% beat Grand Fortune High Grade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asia Strategic-20.83% N/A -8.22%
Grand Fortune High Grade N/A -40.85%-24.81%

Asia Strategic has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grand Fortune High Grade has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

Grand Fortune High Grade has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Asia Strategic.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asia Strategic£32.10M0.00-£5.63M-£208.00N/A
Grand Fortune High Grade£26.000.00N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Asia Strategic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Grand Fortune High Grade'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asia Strategic Neutral
Grand Fortune High Grade Neutral

Summary

Asia Strategic beats Grand Fortune High Grade on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Asia Strategic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ASIA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

ASIA vs. The Competition

MetricAsia StrategicEducation & Training Services IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£144K£35.33M£8.10B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A3.50%3.26%6.12%
P/E Ratio-0.026.13891.50364.34
Price / Sales0.0050.17992,148.9587,480.01
Price / Cash0.076.17140.8827.85
Price / Book-0.021.459.597.74
Net Income-£5.63M£3.33M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance58.33%2.88%0.40%0.21%
1 Year PerformanceN/A23.65%256.71%74.70%

Asia Strategic Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ASIA
Asia Strategic
N/AGBX 4.75
flat
N/AN/A£144K£32.10MN/A2,231
WIL
Wilmington
3.1202 of 5 stars
GBX 241
-0.8%
GBX 451.67
+87.4%
-27.1%£215.83M£106.60M20.051,000
WEY
Wey Education
N/AN/AN/AN/A£66.08M£8.36M78.75200
OBOR
Starcrest Education The Belt & Road Limited (OBOR.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£10.89MN/AN/AN/A
MLVN
Malvern International
N/AGBX 21.90
-2.7%
N/AN/A£7.33M£17.79M57.63153

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ASIA) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners