Hongkong Land (HKLB) Competitors

Hongkong Land (LON:HKLB) and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, community ranking and media sentiment.

Is HKLB or CYBG more profitable?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Hongkong Land's net margin of -31.57%. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hongkong Land's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hongkong Land	-31.57%	-1.77%	1.15%
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	N/A	N/A	N/A

Does the media refer more to HKLB or CYBG?

In the previous week, Hongkong Land and Hongkong Land both had 1 articles in the media. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Hongkong Land's score of 0.00 indicating that VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hongkong Land	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HKLB or CYBG?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hongkong Land. Hongkong Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hongkong Land	£1.84B	0.09	-£582.30M	-£0.15	-49.40
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	£1.24B	0.20	N/A	-£7.10	-2.43

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in HKLB or CYBG?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc received 173 more outperform votes than Hongkong Land when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 58.82% of users gave Hongkong Land an outperform vote while only 50.88% of users gave VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Hongkong Land	Outperform Votes 30 58.82%	Underperform Votes 21 41.18%
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	Outperform Votes 203 50.88%	Underperform Votes 196 49.12%

Do analysts prefer HKLB or CYBG?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hongkong Land	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HKLB or CYBG?

13.0% of Hongkong Land shares are held by institutional investors. 53.4% of Hongkong Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hongkong Land and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.