Jupiter Green (JGC) Competitors

Digital 9 Infrastructure (LON:DGI9) and Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, community ranking, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, DGI9 or JGC?

Digital 9 Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Jupiter Green. Jupiter Green is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Digital 9 Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Digital 9 Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A	£0.01	1,915.00
Jupiter Green	-£9.48M	-4.34	-£9.46M	-£0.01	-21,700.00

Does the media refer more to DGI9 or JGC?

In the previous week, Digital 9 Infrastructure and Digital 9 Infrastructure both had 1 articles in the media. Digital 9 Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Jupiter Green's score of 0.00 indicating that Digital 9 Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Digital 9 Infrastructure	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Jupiter Green	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Do analysts prefer DGI9 or JGC?

Digital 9 Infrastructure currently has a consensus price target of GBX 50, indicating a potential upside of 161.10%. Given Digital 9 Infrastructure's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Digital 9 Infrastructure is more favorable than Jupiter Green.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Digital 9 Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Jupiter Green	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Do insiders & institutionals believe in DGI9 or JGC?

61.2% of Digital 9 Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Digital 9 Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in DGI9 or JGC?

Jupiter Green received 62 more outperform votes than Digital 9 Infrastructure when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 71.26% of users gave Jupiter Green an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Digital 9 Infrastructure an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Digital 9 Infrastructure	Outperform Votes No Votes	Underperform Votes 2 100.00%
Jupiter Green	Outperform Votes 62 71.26%	Underperform Votes 25 28.74%

Is DGI9 or JGC a better dividend stock?

Digital 9 Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 31.3%. Jupiter Green pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Digital 9 Infrastructure pays out 60,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Jupiter Green pays out -10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Is DGI9 or JGC more profitable?

Digital 9 Infrastructure has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Jupiter Green's net margin of -26.72%. Digital 9 Infrastructure's return on equity of 0.00% beat Jupiter Green's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Digital 9 Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A
Jupiter Green	-26.72%	-0.45%	0.15%

Summary

Digital 9 Infrastructure beats Jupiter Green on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.