Free Trial

Petrofac (PFC) Competitors

Petrofac logo
GBX 3.98 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/1/2025

PFC vs. RM, SBSI, IES, CFX, OFG, FCAP, OBT, TRIN, SOS, and HARL

Should you be buying Petrofac stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Petrofac include RM (RM), Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI), Invinity Energy Systems (IES), Colefax Group (CFX), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), Cavendish Financial (FCAP), Obtala (OBT), Trinity Exploration & Production (TRIN), Sosandar (SOS), and Harland & Wolff Group (HARL). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

Petrofac vs.

Petrofac (LON:PFC) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and community ranking.

Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 2.19, meaning that its stock price is 119% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Petrofac has a net margin of -21.67% compared to RM's net margin of -24.97%. Petrofac's return on equity of 108.19% beat RM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petrofac-21.67% 108.19% -9.55%
RM -24.97%-311.10%-1.51%

In the previous week, RM had 9 more articles in the media than Petrofac. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for RM and 2 mentions for Petrofac. RM's average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat Petrofac's score of 0.00 indicating that RM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Petrofac
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
RM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

RM has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. RM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Petrofac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petrofac£3.30B0.01-£714.53M-£81.55-0.05
RM£189.50M0.44-£47.32M-£55.02-1.80

27.4% of Petrofac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Petrofac shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petrofac received 511 more outperform votes than RM when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 81.67% of users gave RM an outperform vote while only 71.05% of users gave Petrofac an outperform vote.

CompanyUnderperformOutperform
PetrofacOutperform Votes
756
71.05%
Underperform Votes
308
28.95%
RMOutperform Votes
245
81.67%
Underperform Votes
55
18.33%

Petrofac pays an annual dividend of GBX 30 per share and has a dividend yield of 753.8%. RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Petrofac pays out -36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RM pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Petrofac is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

RM beats Petrofac on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Petrofac News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFC vs. The Competition

MetricPetrofacOil & Gas Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£26.92M£335.19M£7.28B£2.68B
Dividend Yield14.51%19.70%10.95%5.05%
P/E Ratio-0.059.3154.35134.32
Price / Sales0.0157.2323,751.13203,702.45
Price / Cash0.9325.9435.5028.02
Price / Book-0.032.293.533.79
Net Income-£714.53M£10.66M£4.30B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.43%-1.21%7.78%
1 Month Performance-31.97%7.84%7.90%29.45%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.49%175.33%119.74%

Petrofac Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFC
Petrofac
N/AGBX 3.98
flat
N/AN/A£26.92M£3.30B-0.058,600News Coverage
RM
RM
N/AGBX 98
flat
N/A+17.4%£82.78M£189.50M-1.781,990Trending News
High Trading Volume
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 76
+3.4%
N/A-9.9%£62.59M£2.21M60.43810
IES
Invinity Energy Systems
1.5793 of 5 stars
GBX 13
+2.0%
GBX 40
+207.7%
-44.1%£56.86M£15.88M-1.50140
CFX
Colefax Group
N/AGBX 801.20
+0.8%
N/A+1.2%£46.93M£101.60M8.5455,900
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AN/AN/AN/A£34.75MN/A0.002,250High Trading Volume
FCAP
Cavendish Financial
N/AN/AN/AN/A£28.61M£32.15M-263.33220Gap Down
OBT
Obtala
N/AN/AN/AN/A£28.50M£14.89M-1.86210Gap Down
TRIN
Trinity Exploration & Production
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.38M£69.83M-523.0840
SOS
Sosandar
N/AGBX 7.50
-6.3%
N/A-18.1%£18.62M£46.28M-44.01170
HARL
Harland & Wolff Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£14.49M£86.91M-34.9081

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PFC) was last updated on 5/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
From Our Partners