S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
Log in
NASDAQ:ACIA

Acacia Communications Competitors

$114.93
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 02/25/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$114.90
Now: $114.93
$114.98
50-Day Range
$72.45
MA: $109.24
$114.98
52-Week Range
$60.62
Now: $114.93
$114.99
Volume715,140 shs
Average Volume1.98 million shs
Market Capitalization$4.90 billion
P/E Ratio72.28
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.78

Competitors

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) Vs. QRVO, ASX, MPWR, ON, SEDG, and IPGP

Should you be buying ACIA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "semiconductors & related devices" are considered alternatives and competitors to Acacia Communications, including Qorvo (QRVO), ASE Technology (ASX), Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), ON Semiconductor (ON), SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG), and IPG Photonics (IPGP).

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) and Qorvo (NASDAQ:QRVO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.6% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Qorvo shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Qorvo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Acacia Communications has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Qorvo has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acacia Communications and Qorvo's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Communications$464.66 million10.54$32.84 million$1.1897.40
Qorvo$3.24 billion5.91$334.33 million$5.7129.59

Qorvo has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Communications. Qorvo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acacia Communications and Qorvo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Acacia Communications12.56%11.85%9.53%
Qorvo12.71%18.08%11.32%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Acacia Communications and Qorvo, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Acacia Communications04102.20
Qorvo061602.73

Acacia Communications currently has a consensus target price of $106.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.19%. Qorvo has a consensus target price of $177.6190, suggesting a potential upside of 5.13%. Given Qorvo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Qorvo is more favorable than Acacia Communications.

Summary

Qorvo beats Acacia Communications on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) and ASE Technology (NYSE:ASX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.6% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of ASE Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of ASE Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Acacia Communications has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ASE Technology has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acacia Communications and ASE Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Communications$464.66 million10.54$32.84 million$1.1897.40
ASE Technology$13.56 billion1.21$570.40 million$0.2530.32

ASE Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Communications. ASE Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acacia Communications and ASE Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Acacia Communications12.56%11.85%9.53%
ASE Technology5.39%11.06%4.20%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Acacia Communications and ASE Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Acacia Communications04102.20
ASE Technology01002.00

Acacia Communications currently has a consensus target price of $106.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.19%. Given Acacia Communications' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acacia Communications is more favorable than ASE Technology.

Summary

Acacia Communications beats ASE Technology on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) and Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.6% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Acacia Communications has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acacia Communications and Monolithic Power Systems' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Communications$464.66 million10.54$32.84 million$1.1897.40
Monolithic Power Systems$627.92 million26.04$108.84 million$2.53143.32

Monolithic Power Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Communications. Acacia Communications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acacia Communications and Monolithic Power Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Acacia Communications12.56%11.85%9.53%
Monolithic Power Systems19.78%17.95%14.33%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Acacia Communications and Monolithic Power Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Acacia Communications04102.20
Monolithic Power Systems001003.00

Acacia Communications currently has a consensus target price of $106.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.19%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus target price of $370.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.04%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than Acacia Communications.

Summary

Monolithic Power Systems beats Acacia Communications on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) and ON Semiconductor (NASDAQ:ON) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.6% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of ON Semiconductor shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of ON Semiconductor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Acacia Communications has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ON Semiconductor has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acacia Communications and ON Semiconductor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Communications$464.66 million10.54$32.84 million$1.1897.40
ON Semiconductor$5.52 billion2.82$211.70 million$1.4925.33

ON Semiconductor has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Communications. ON Semiconductor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acacia Communications and ON Semiconductor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Acacia Communications12.56%11.85%9.53%
ON Semiconductor3.87%9.92%3.59%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Acacia Communications and ON Semiconductor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Acacia Communications04102.20
ON Semiconductor351412.57

Acacia Communications currently has a consensus target price of $106.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.19%. ON Semiconductor has a consensus target price of $33.9167, suggesting a potential downside of 10.13%. Given Acacia Communications' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acacia Communications is more favorable than ON Semiconductor.

Summary

ON Semiconductor beats Acacia Communications on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) and SolarEdge Technologies (NASDAQ:SEDG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.6% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of SolarEdge Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of SolarEdge Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Acacia Communications has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SolarEdge Technologies has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acacia Communications and SolarEdge Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Communications$464.66 million10.54$32.84 million$1.1897.40
SolarEdge Technologies$1.43 billion10.29$146.55 million$2.9098.04

SolarEdge Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Communications. Acacia Communications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SolarEdge Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acacia Communications and SolarEdge Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Acacia Communications12.56%11.85%9.53%
SolarEdge Technologies11.55%19.31%10.18%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Acacia Communications and SolarEdge Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Acacia Communications04102.20
SolarEdge Technologies29602.24

Acacia Communications currently has a consensus target price of $106.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.19%. SolarEdge Technologies has a consensus target price of $294.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given SolarEdge Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SolarEdge Technologies is more favorable than Acacia Communications.

Summary

SolarEdge Technologies beats Acacia Communications on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:ACIA) and IPG Photonics (NASDAQ:IPGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.6% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of Acacia Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.0% of IPG Photonics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Acacia Communications has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, IPG Photonics has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acacia Communications and IPG Photonics' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Communications$464.66 million10.54$32.84 million$1.1897.40
IPG Photonics$1.31 billion8.96$180.23 million$4.3650.45

IPG Photonics has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Communications. IPG Photonics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acacia Communications and IPG Photonics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Acacia Communications12.56%11.85%9.53%
IPG Photonics9.04%7.76%6.85%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Acacia Communications and IPG Photonics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Acacia Communications04102.20
IPG Photonics04502.56

Acacia Communications currently has a consensus target price of $106.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 7.19%. IPG Photonics has a consensus target price of $230.9444, suggesting a potential upside of 4.99%. Given IPG Photonics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IPG Photonics is more favorable than Acacia Communications.

Summary

IPG Photonics beats Acacia Communications on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Acacia Communications Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Qorvo logo
QRVO
Qorvo
1.8$168.95flat$19.14 billion$3.24 billion44.46
ASE Technology logo
ASX
ASE Technology
1.7$7.58flat$16.44 billion$13.56 billion19.95
Monolithic Power Systems logo
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems
2.0$362.59flat$16.35 billion$627.92 million110.21Insider Selling
ON Semiconductor logo
ON
ON Semiconductor
1.8$37.74flat$15.54 billion$5.52 billion77.02
SolarEdge Technologies logo
SEDG
SolarEdge Technologies
1.7$284.33flat$14.67 billion$1.43 billion83.14Analyst Report
Gap Up
IPG Photonics logo
IPGP
IPG Photonics
1.3$219.97flat$11.78 billion$1.31 billion111.66
Cree logo
CREE
Cree
1.0$105.21flat$11.68 billion$903.90 million-33.94Analyst Upgrade
First Solar logo
FSLR
First Solar
1.3$81.40flat$8.63 billion$3.06 billion38.95Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
IPHI
Inphi
1.7$159.69flat$8.32 billion$365.64 million-123.79Insider Selling
Daqo New Energy logo
DQ
Daqo New Energy
1.2$97.90flat$6.80 billion$349.99 million94.32News Coverage
Silicon Laboratories logo
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories
1.7$153.88flat$6.76 billion$837.55 million512.93Analyst Report
Lattice Semiconductor logo
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
1.4$46.15flat$6.28 billion$404.09 million139.85Insider Selling
Gap Up
SunPower logo
SPWR
SunPower
1.2$34.59flat$5.89 billion$1.86 billion93.49Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Amkor Technology logo
AMKR
Amkor Technology
1.9$22.78flat$5.54 billion$4.05 billion17.80
Power Integrations logo
POWI
Power Integrations
1.9$85.43flat$5.13 billion$420.67 million25.39Insider Selling
ALGM
Allegro MicroSystems
2.2$26.72flat$5.06 billionN/A0.00
CMC Materials logo
CCMP
CMC Materials
1.6$166.63flat$4.86 billion$1.12 billion34.50
Cirrus Logic logo
CRUS
Cirrus Logic
2.0$82.13flat$4.77 billion$1.28 billion31.71
Semtech logo
SMTC
Semtech
1.8$72.11flat$4.69 billion$547.51 million101.56
Synaptics logo
SYNA
Synaptics
1.5$130.30flat$4.55 billion$1.33 billion40.85Analyst Report
MACOM Technology Solutions logo
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions
1.8$62.75flat$4.29 billion$530.04 million-72.96
Ambarella logo
AMBA
Ambarella
1.5$113.29flat$3.98 billion$228.73 million-64.37Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Viavi Solutions logo
VIAV
Viavi Solutions
1.5$16.54flat$3.78 billion$1.14 billion103.38
FormFactor logo
FORM
FormFactor
1.5$44.83flat$3.49 billion$589.46 million45.28
Diodes logo
DIOD
Diodes
1.6$75.77flat$3.36 billion$1.25 billion34.60Insider Selling
Tower Semiconductor logo
TSEM
Tower Semiconductor
2.0$29.61flat$3.16 billion$1.23 billion44.19
Kulicke and Soffa Industries logo
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
2.2$47.50flat$2.95 billion$623.18 million57.23
MaxLinear logo
MXL
MaxLinear
1.6$39.12flat$2.92 billion$317.18 million-34.93Insider Selling
Canadian Solar logo
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
2.0$45.62flat$2.71 billion$3.20 billion13.22
CAN
Canaan
0.5$15.71flat$2.46 billion$204.35 million24.94Gap Down
Rambus logo
RMBS
Rambus
1.0$20.99flat$2.39 billion$224.03 million-58.30
Himax Technologies logo
HIMX
Himax Technologies
1.2$13.16flat$2.27 billion$671.84 million146.24
JinkoSolar logo
JKS
JinkoSolar
0.9$49.94flat$2.20 billion$4.27 billion36.72
Xperi logo
XPER
Xperi
1.8$20.36flat$2.15 billion$280.07 million-35.10Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Silicon Motion Technology logo
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology
2.1$58.78flat$2.15 billion$457.25 million19.79
Ultra Clean logo
UCTT
Ultra Clean
1.7$44.75flat$1.81 billion$1.07 billion41.44Analyst Report
SiTime logo
SITM
SiTime
1.4$101.19flat$1.74 billion$84.07 million-146.65Insider Selling
OSI Systems logo
OSIS
OSI Systems
1.7$96.39flat$1.73 billion$1.17 billion27.94
nLIGHT logo
LASR
nLIGHT
1.2$37.54flat$1.48 billion$176.62 million-52.14Analyst Downgrade
CEVA logo
CEVA
CEVA
1.7$63.89flat$1.42 billion$87.15 million6,389.00
SMART Global logo
SGH
SMART Global
1.4$46.87flat$1.16 billion$1.12 billion25.90
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES logo
IMOS
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES
0.9$27.04flat$983.23 million$680 million13.25Gap Down
Ichor logo
ICHR
Ichor
1.7$41.74flat$971.92 million$620.84 million33.39
MAXN
Maxeon Solar Technologies
1.2$29.64flat$894.57 millionN/A0.00Analyst Downgrade
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor logo
AOSL
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor
1.4$33.80flat$871.06 million$464.91 million563.33
Photronics logo
PLAB
Photronics
1.7$12.09flat$766.70 million$609.69 million22.81Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Kopin logo
KOPN
Kopin
0.7$8.71flat$740.81 million$29.52 million-58.06Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
EBON
Ebang International
1.0$7.46flat$689.38 million$109.06 million0.00Gap Down
MagnaChip Semiconductor logo
MX
MagnaChip Semiconductor
2.3$18.09flat$642.88 million$792.20 million2.83Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Atomera logo
ATOM
Atomera
0.4$27.62flat$592.59 million$530,000.00-34.52
This page was last updated on 2/26/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.