Bed Bath & Beyond Competitors

Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) and Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.9% of Tapestry shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tapestry shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Tapestry has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tapestry and Bed Bath & Beyond's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Bed Bath & Beyond has higher revenue and earnings than Tapestry. Tapestry is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bed Bath & Beyond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Tapestry and Bed Bath & Beyond's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Tapestry and Bed Bath & Beyond, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Tapestry currently has a consensus target price of $33.3913, indicating a potential downside of 20.76%. Bed Bath & Beyond has a consensus target price of $23.7143, indicating a potential downside of 11.71%. Given Bed Bath & Beyond's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bed Bath & Beyond is more favorable than Tapestry.

Summary

Tapestry beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Advance Auto Parts (NYSE:AAP) and Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Advance Auto Parts shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Advance Auto Parts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Advance Auto Parts has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Advance Auto Parts and Bed Bath & Beyond's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Advance Auto Parts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bed Bath & Beyond. Advance Auto Parts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bed Bath & Beyond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Advance Auto Parts and Bed Bath & Beyond's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Advance Auto Parts and Bed Bath & Beyond, as provided by MarketBeat.

Advance Auto Parts presently has a consensus target price of $154.9524, indicating a potential downside of 3.37%. Bed Bath & Beyond has a consensus target price of $23.7143, indicating a potential downside of 11.71%. Given Advance Auto Parts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Advance Auto Parts is more favorable than Bed Bath & Beyond.

Summary

Advance Auto Parts beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Five Below has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and Bed Bath & Beyond's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Five Below has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bed Bath & Beyond. Bed Bath & Beyond is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and Bed Bath & Beyond's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Five Below and Bed Bath & Beyond, as provided by MarketBeat.

Five Below presently has a consensus target price of $177.0909, indicating a potential downside of 4.85%. Bed Bath & Beyond has a consensus target price of $23.7143, indicating a potential downside of 11.71%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Five Below is more favorable than Bed Bath & Beyond.

Summary

Five Below beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Williams-Sonoma (NYSE:WSM) and Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.6% of Williams-Sonoma shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Williams-Sonoma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Williams-Sonoma and Bed Bath & Beyond's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Williams-Sonoma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bed Bath & Beyond. Williams-Sonoma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bed Bath & Beyond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Williams-Sonoma and Bed Bath & Beyond's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Williams-Sonoma and Bed Bath & Beyond, as provided by MarketBeat.

Williams-Sonoma presently has a consensus target price of $100.2941, indicating a potential downside of 23.61%. Bed Bath & Beyond has a consensus target price of $23.7143, indicating a potential downside of 11.71%. Given Bed Bath & Beyond's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bed Bath & Beyond is more favorable than Williams-Sonoma.

Summary

Williams-Sonoma beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RH (NYSE:RH) and Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

RH has a beta of 2.58, suggesting that its share price is 158% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares RH and Bed Bath & Beyond's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RH has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bed Bath & Beyond. RH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bed Bath & Beyond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares RH and Bed Bath & Beyond's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for RH and Bed Bath & Beyond, as provided by MarketBeat.

RH presently has a consensus target price of $454.2143, indicating a potential downside of 7.37%. Bed Bath & Beyond has a consensus target price of $23.7143, indicating a potential downside of 11.71%. Given RH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RH is more favorable than Bed Bath & Beyond.

Summary

RH beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lithia Motors (NYSE:LAD) and Bed Bath & Beyond (NASDAQ:BBBY) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Lithia Motors and Bed Bath & Beyond, as provided by MarketBeat.

Lithia Motors presently has a consensus target price of $327.4545, indicating a potential downside of 12.43%. Bed Bath & Beyond has a consensus target price of $23.7143, indicating a potential downside of 11.71%. Given Bed Bath & Beyond's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bed Bath & Beyond is more favorable than Lithia Motors.

Risk & Volatility

Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lithia Motors and Bed Bath & Beyond's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lithia Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Bed Bath & Beyond. Lithia Motors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bed Bath & Beyond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Lithia Motors shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Lithia Motors shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Lithia Motors and Bed Bath & Beyond's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lithia Motors beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.