BBQ Competitors

BBQ (NASDAQ:BBQ) and Fiesta Restaurant Group (NASDAQ:FRGI) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BBQ and Fiesta Restaurant Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BBQ has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fiesta Restaurant Group.

Risk and Volatility

BBQ has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fiesta Restaurant Group has a beta of 2.16, suggesting that its share price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of BBQ shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of BBQ shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fiesta Restaurant Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BBQ and Fiesta Restaurant Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for BBQ and Fiesta Restaurant Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

BBQ presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Fiesta Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.79%. Given BBQ's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe BBQ is more favorable than Fiesta Restaurant Group.

Summary

BBQ beats Fiesta Restaurant Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

BBQ (NASDAQ:BBQ) and Carrols Restaurant Group (NASDAQ:TAST) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BBQ and Carrols Restaurant Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BBQ has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carrols Restaurant Group.

Risk and Volatility

BBQ has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carrols Restaurant Group has a beta of 2.61, suggesting that its share price is 161% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of BBQ shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.7% of Carrols Restaurant Group shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of BBQ shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Carrols Restaurant Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BBQ and Carrols Restaurant Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for BBQ and Carrols Restaurant Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

BBQ presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Carrols Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.35%. Given BBQ's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe BBQ is more favorable than Carrols Restaurant Group.

BBQ (NASDAQ:BBQ) and Biglari (NYSE:BH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BBQ and Biglari's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Biglari has higher revenue and earnings than BBQ.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of BBQ shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of BBQ shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 58.8% of Biglari shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BBQ and Biglari's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for BBQ and Biglari, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

BBQ presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Given BBQ's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe BBQ is more favorable than Biglari.

Summary

BBQ beats Biglari on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

BBQ (NASDAQ:BBQ) and LiveXLive Media (NASDAQ:LIVX) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

BBQ has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LiveXLive Media has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BBQ and LiveXLive Media's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

BBQ has higher revenue and earnings than LiveXLive Media.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.3% of BBQ shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.1% of LiveXLive Media shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of BBQ shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of LiveXLive Media shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BBQ and LiveXLive Media's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for BBQ and LiveXLive Media, as reported by MarketBeat.

BBQ presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. LiveXLive Media has a consensus price target of $6.2917, suggesting a potential upside of 69.59%. Given LiveXLive Media's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe LiveXLive Media is more favorable than BBQ.

Summary

BBQ beats LiveXLive Media on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

BBQ (NASDAQ:BBQ) and Nathan's Famous (NASDAQ:NATH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

BBQ has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nathan's Famous has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares BBQ and Nathan's Famous' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for BBQ and Nathan's Famous, as reported by MarketBeat.

BBQ presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Given BBQ's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe BBQ is more favorable than Nathan's Famous.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BBQ and Nathan's Famous' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Nathan's Famous has higher revenue and earnings than BBQ.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.3% of BBQ shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Nathan's Famous shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of BBQ shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.5% of Nathan's Famous shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kura Sushi USA (NASDAQ:KRUS) and BBQ (NASDAQ:BBQ) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

32.3% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of BBQ shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Kura Sushi USA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of BBQ shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 2.3, meaning that its share price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BBQ has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Kura Sushi USA and BBQ's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kura Sushi USA and BBQ's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BBQ has higher revenue and earnings than Kura Sushi USA.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Kura Sushi USA and BBQ, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Kura Sushi USA presently has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.89%. BBQ has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Given BBQ's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BBQ is more favorable than Kura Sushi USA.

Summary

BBQ beats Kura Sushi USA on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.