Boston Private Financial Competitors

Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) and Boston Private Financial (NASDAQ:BPFH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Truist Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Boston Private Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Truist Financial pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boston Private Financial pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Truist Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boston Private Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Truist Financial and Boston Private Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Truist Financial presently has a consensus price target of $53.0833, indicating a potential downside of 4.78%. Boston Private Financial has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 40.96%. Given Truist Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Truist Financial is more favorable than Boston Private Financial.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Truist Financial and Boston Private Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Truist Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Private Financial. Truist Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boston Private Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

72.1% of Truist Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.0% of Boston Private Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Truist Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Boston Private Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Truist Financial and Boston Private Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Truist Financial has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Private Financial has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Truist Financial beats Boston Private Financial on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Private Financial (NASDAQ:BPFH) and The PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Volatility & Risk

Boston Private Financial has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.0% of Boston Private Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Boston Private Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Boston Private Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. The PNC Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Boston Private Financial pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The PNC Financial Services Group pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Boston Private Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The PNC Financial Services Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Private Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Boston Private Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Boston Private Financial presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 40.96%. The PNC Financial Services Group has a consensus target price of $174.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.32%. Given The PNC Financial Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The PNC Financial Services Group is more favorable than Boston Private Financial.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Boston Private Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The PNC Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Private Financial. Boston Private Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The PNC Financial Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The PNC Financial Services Group beats Boston Private Financial on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) and Boston Private Financial (NASDAQ:BPFH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares First Republic Bank and Boston Private Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

First Republic Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Private Financial. Boston Private Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Republic Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

First Republic Bank pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Boston Private Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. First Republic Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boston Private Financial pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Republic Bank has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Boston Private Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares First Republic Bank and Boston Private Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.5% of First Republic Bank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.0% of Boston Private Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Boston Private Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for First Republic Bank and Boston Private Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.

First Republic Bank currently has a consensus price target of $144.1765, indicating a potential downside of 16.48%. Boston Private Financial has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 40.96%. Given First Republic Bank's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe First Republic Bank is more favorable than Boston Private Financial.

Volatility & Risk

First Republic Bank has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Private Financial has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

First Republic Bank beats Boston Private Financial on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Private Financial (NASDAQ:BPFH) and SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SIVB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.0% of Boston Private Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Boston Private Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Private Financial and SVB Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Boston Private Financial and SVB Financial Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SVB Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Private Financial. Boston Private Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SVB Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Boston Private Financial and SVB Financial Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Boston Private Financial presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 40.96%. SVB Financial Group has a consensus target price of $434.5333, indicating a potential downside of 14.41%. Given SVB Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SVB Financial Group is more favorable than Boston Private Financial.

Volatility and Risk

Boston Private Financial has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SVB Financial Group has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SVB Financial Group beats Boston Private Financial on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) and Boston Private Financial (NASDAQ:BPFH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Private Financial has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fifth Third Bancorp and Boston Private Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fifth Third Bancorp presently has a consensus target price of $34.4605, indicating a potential downside of 5.43%. Boston Private Financial has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 40.96%. Given Fifth Third Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Fifth Third Bancorp is more favorable than Boston Private Financial.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.2% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.0% of Boston Private Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Boston Private Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Fifth Third Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Boston Private Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boston Private Financial pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fifth Third Bancorp has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Boston Private Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fifth Third Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fifth Third Bancorp and Boston Private Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fifth Third Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Private Financial. Fifth Third Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boston Private Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fifth Third Bancorp and Boston Private Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Fifth Third Bancorp beats Boston Private Financial on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and Boston Private Financial (NASDAQ:BPFH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.0% of Boston Private Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Boston Private Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Private Financial has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and Boston Private Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Boston Private Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boston Private Financial pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boston Private Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Regions Financial and Boston Private Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial presently has a consensus target price of $18.5526, indicating a potential downside of 7.24%. Boston Private Financial has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 40.96%. Given Regions Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Regions Financial is more favorable than Boston Private Financial.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Regions Financial and Boston Private Financial's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regions Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Private Financial. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boston Private Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Regions Financial beats Boston Private Financial on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.