Borqs Technologies Competitors

Cerner (NASDAQ:CERN) and Borqs Technologies (NASDAQ:BRQS) are both medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Cerner and Borqs Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cerner and Borqs Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cerner has higher revenue and earnings than Borqs Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Cerner shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cerner shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Cerner and Borqs Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cerner currently has a consensus target price of $79.7778, indicating a potential upside of 12.82%. Given Cerner's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cerner is more favorable than Borqs Technologies.

Volatility & Risk

Cerner has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Borqs Technologies has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cerner beats Borqs Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) and Borqs Technologies (NASDAQ:BRQS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares GoDaddy and Borqs Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GoDaddy has higher revenue and earnings than Borqs Technologies.

Risk and Volatility

GoDaddy has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Borqs Technologies has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.2% of GoDaddy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of GoDaddy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for GoDaddy and Borqs Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

GoDaddy presently has a consensus target price of $99.7143, suggesting a potential upside of 35.28%. Given GoDaddy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe GoDaddy is more favorable than Borqs Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares GoDaddy and Borqs Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

GoDaddy beats Borqs Technologies on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Borqs Technologies (NASDAQ:BRQS) and Leidos (NYSE:LDOS) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Borqs Technologies and Leidos' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Borqs Technologies and Leidos, as provided by MarketBeat.

Leidos has a consensus target price of $115.4545, indicating a potential upside of 23.51%. Given Leidos' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Leidos is more favorable than Borqs Technologies.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.1% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.2% of Leidos shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Leidos shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Borqs Technologies has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Leidos has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Borqs Technologies and Leidos' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Borqs Technologies.

Summary

Leidos beats Borqs Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) and Borqs Technologies (NASDAQ:BRQS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

64.0% of Open Text shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Borqs Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Open Text shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Borqs Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Open Text has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Borqs Technologies has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Open Text and Borqs Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Open Text has higher revenue and earnings than Borqs Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Open Text and Borqs Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Open Text and Borqs Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Open Text presently has a consensus target price of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.63%. Given Open Text's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Open Text is more favorable than Borqs Technologies.

Summary

Open Text beats Borqs Technologies on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jack Henry & Associates (NASDAQ:JKHY) and Borqs Technologies (NASDAQ:BRQS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Borqs Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Borqs Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Jack Henry & Associates and Borqs Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Jack Henry & Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Borqs Technologies.

Volatility & Risk

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Borqs Technologies has a beta of 2.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Jack Henry & Associates and Borqs Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Jack Henry & Associates and Borqs Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Jack Henry & Associates currently has a consensus price target of $176.8889, indicating a potential upside of 14.44%. Given Jack Henry & Associates' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Jack Henry & Associates is more favorable than Borqs Technologies.

Summary

Jack Henry & Associates beats Borqs Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Borqs Technologies (NASDAQ:BRQS) and CACI International (NYSE:CACI) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

12.1% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of CACI International shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Borqs Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CACI International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Borqs Technologies and CACI International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CACI International has higher revenue and earnings than Borqs Technologies.

Volatility and Risk

Borqs Technologies has a beta of 2.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CACI International has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Borqs Technologies and CACI International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Borqs Technologies and CACI International, as reported by MarketBeat.

CACI International has a consensus target price of $286.6364, indicating a potential upside of 29.99%. Given CACI International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CACI International is more favorable than Borqs Technologies.

Summary

CACI International beats Borqs Technologies on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.