S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NASDAQ:CCLP

CSI Compressco Competitors

$1.94
-0.08 (-3.96 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.85
Now: $1.94
$1.99
50-Day Range
$1.00
MA: $1.47
$2.16
52-Week Range
$0.35
Now: $1.94
$2.35
Volume220,997 shs
Average Volume257,424 shs
Market Capitalization$91.86 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield1.98%
Beta2.08

Competitors

CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) Vs. SLB, HAL, CLB, RES, LBRT, and OII

Should you be buying CCLP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to CSI Compressco, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), Core Laboratories (CLB), RPC (RES), Liberty Oilfield Services (LBRT), and Oceaneering International (OII).

CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for CSI Compressco and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CSI Compressco30001.00
Schlumberger361702.54

CSI Compressco presently has a consensus price target of $0.50, indicating a potential downside of 74.23%. Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.9375, indicating a potential downside of 17.82%. Given Schlumberger's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than CSI Compressco.

Dividends

CSI Compressco pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Schlumberger pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CSI Compressco pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CSI Compressco has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Schlumberger has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CSI Compressco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares CSI Compressco and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CSI Compressco-13.55%-134.42%-3.88%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Risk and Volatility

CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CSI Compressco and Schlumberger's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSI Compressco$476.58 million0.19$-20,970,000.00($0.40)-4.85
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.18$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4718.99

CSI Compressco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. CSI Compressco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Schlumberger beats CSI Compressco on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Halliburton and CSI Compressco, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halliburton3111022.42
CSI Compressco30001.00

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $16.8190, indicating a potential downside of 22.95%. CSI Compressco has a consensus target price of $0.50, indicating a potential downside of 74.23%. Given Halliburton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than CSI Compressco.

Dividends

Halliburton pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. CSI Compressco pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Halliburton pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CSI Compressco pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Halliburton has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CSI Compressco has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CSI Compressco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and CSI Compressco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%
CSI Compressco-13.55%-134.42%-3.88%

Volatility and Risk

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, meaning that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Halliburton and CSI Compressco's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.87$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.60
CSI Compressco$476.58 million0.19$-20,970,000.00($0.40)-4.85

CSI Compressco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. CSI Compressco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Halliburton beats CSI Compressco on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) and CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.7% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Core Laboratories and CSI Compressco, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Core Laboratories19202.08
CSI Compressco30001.00

Core Laboratories currently has a consensus target price of $21.2222, indicating a potential downside of 40.29%. CSI Compressco has a consensus target price of $0.50, indicating a potential downside of 74.23%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than CSI Compressco.

Profitability

This table compares Core Laboratories and CSI Compressco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Core Laboratories-19.02%45.39%6.74%
CSI Compressco-13.55%-134.42%-3.88%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Core Laboratories and CSI Compressco's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core Laboratories$668.21 million2.37$101.98 million$1.7919.85
CSI Compressco$476.58 million0.19$-20,970,000.00($0.40)-4.85

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than CSI Compressco. CSI Compressco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Core Laboratories has a beta of 3.38, meaning that its stock price is 238% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, meaning that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Core Laboratories pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. CSI Compressco pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Core Laboratories pays out 2.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CSI Compressco pays out -10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Core Laboratories has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CSI Compressco has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CSI Compressco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Core Laboratories beats CSI Compressco on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for CSI Compressco and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CSI Compressco30001.00
RPC23101.83

CSI Compressco currently has a consensus target price of $0.50, indicating a potential downside of 74.23%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 49.94%. Given RPC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RPC is more favorable than CSI Compressco.

Profitability

This table compares CSI Compressco and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CSI Compressco-13.55%-134.42%-3.88%
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CSI Compressco and RPC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSI Compressco$476.58 million0.19$-20,970,000.00($0.40)-4.85
RPC$1.22 billion1.12$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-52.92

CSI Compressco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RPC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSI Compressco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

RPC beats CSI Compressco on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) and Liberty Oilfield Services (NYSE:LBRT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Liberty Oilfield Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for CSI Compressco and Liberty Oilfield Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CSI Compressco30001.00
Liberty Oilfield Services25502.25

CSI Compressco currently has a consensus target price of $0.50, indicating a potential downside of 74.23%. Liberty Oilfield Services has a consensus target price of $10.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. Given Liberty Oilfield Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Liberty Oilfield Services is more favorable than CSI Compressco.

Profitability

This table compares CSI Compressco and Liberty Oilfield Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CSI Compressco-13.55%-134.42%-3.88%
Liberty Oilfield Services-8.20%-11.01%-6.95%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CSI Compressco and Liberty Oilfield Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSI Compressco$476.58 million0.19$-20,970,000.00($0.40)-4.85
Liberty Oilfield Services$1.99 billion0.66$39 million$0.5322.06

Liberty Oilfield Services has higher revenue and earnings than CSI Compressco. CSI Compressco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Oilfield Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liberty Oilfield Services has a beta of 3.31, indicating that its stock price is 231% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Liberty Oilfield Services beats CSI Compressco on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CSI Compressco (NASDAQ:CCLP) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

18.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of CSI Compressco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for CSI Compressco and Oceaneering International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CSI Compressco30001.00
Oceaneering International09102.10

CSI Compressco currently has a consensus target price of $0.50, indicating a potential downside of 74.23%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $6.8286, indicating a potential downside of 42.13%. Given Oceaneering International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than CSI Compressco.

Profitability

This table compares CSI Compressco and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CSI Compressco-13.55%-134.42%-3.88%
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CSI Compressco and Oceaneering International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSI Compressco$476.58 million0.19$-20,970,000.00($0.40)-4.85
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.57$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-14.39

CSI Compressco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSI Compressco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

CSI Compressco has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, indicating that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats CSI Compressco on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


CSI Compressco Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$27.91-2.1%$38.86 billion$32.92 billion-3.67News Coverage
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$21.83-0.9%$19.40 billion$22.41 billion-4.39
Core Laboratories logo
CLB
Core Laboratories
1.5$35.54-2.1%$1.58 billion$668.21 million-15.66
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$6.35-0.6%$1.37 billion$1.22 billion-5.93
Liberty Oilfield Services logo
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services
1.1$11.69-1.2%$1.32 billion$1.99 billion-10.72Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$11.80-2.1%$1.17 billion$2.05 billion-1.59Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
PUMP
ProPetro
1.3$11.47-2.4%$1.16 billion$2.05 billion-27.98Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited
1.6$13.25-0.4%$1.16 billion$658.39 million31.55Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Frank's International logo
FI
Frank's International
0.8$4.53-1.5%$1.03 billion$579.92 million-3.24Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
NEX
NexTier Oilfield Solutions
1.3$4.65-0.4%$996.80 million$1.82 billion-2.55Gap Up
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.3$4.90-0.8%$735.79 million$751.91 million30.63Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Select Energy Services logo
WTTR
Select Energy Services
1.0$6.32-1.1%$651.24 million$1.29 billion-1.84Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
North American Construction Group logo
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.6$11.95-3.1%$366.05 million$541.89 million10.13Dividend Increase
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$5.56-14.4%$254.46 million$625.01 million-1.61Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.40-0.9%$140.08 million$78.44 million74.29News Coverage
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.0$1.77-4.5%$131.10 million$514.76 million-0.40Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$14.99-6.3%$127.57 million$544 million-0.22Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
NINE
Nine Energy Service
0.6$3.40-2.6%$107.31 million$832.94 million-0.18Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$38.50-1.0%$90.86 million$205.49 million-1.32Upcoming Earnings
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.0$5.51-0.5%$84.83 million$336.90 million-6.72Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
RCON
Recon Technology
0.6$2.18-2.3%$39.07 million$9.30 million0.00News Coverage
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.