Whole Earth Brands Competitors

Whole Earth Brands (NASDAQ:FREE) and B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and B&G Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Whole Earth Brands and B&G Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.

Whole Earth Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 50.27%. B&G Foods has a consensus price target of $27.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.06%. Given Whole Earth Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Whole Earth Brands is more favorable than B&G Foods.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Whole Earth Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of B&G Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of B&G Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and B&G Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

B&G Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Whole Earth Brands.

Volatility and Risk

Whole Earth Brands has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, B&G Foods has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

B&G Foods beats Whole Earth Brands on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Whole Earth Brands (NASDAQ:FREE) and Fresh Del Monte Produce (NYSE:FDP) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Fresh Del Monte Produce's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Whole Earth Brands and Fresh Del Monte Produce, as reported by MarketBeat.

Whole Earth Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 50.27%. Given Whole Earth Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Whole Earth Brands is more favorable than Fresh Del Monte Produce.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Whole Earth Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Fresh Del Monte Produce shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.6% of Fresh Del Monte Produce shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Fresh Del Monte Produce's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fresh Del Monte Produce has higher revenue and earnings than Whole Earth Brands.

Volatility and Risk

Whole Earth Brands has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fresh Del Monte Produce has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Fresh Del Monte Produce beats Whole Earth Brands on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Whole Earth Brands (NASDAQ:FREE) and Meredith (NYSE:MDP) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Meredith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Whole Earth Brands and Meredith, as reported by MarketBeat.

Whole Earth Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 50.27%. Meredith has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.69%. Given Whole Earth Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Whole Earth Brands is more favorable than Meredith.

Volatility and Risk

Whole Earth Brands has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Meredith has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Whole Earth Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Meredith shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.4% of Meredith shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Meredith's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Whole Earth Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Meredith.

Summary

Meredith beats Whole Earth Brands on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Whole Earth Brands (NASDAQ:FREE) and Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Whole Earth Brands and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Whole Earth Brands currently has a consensus target price of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 50.27%. Given Whole Earth Brands' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Whole Earth Brands is more favorable than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Volatility and Risk

Whole Earth Brands has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Whole Earth Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Schweitzer-Mauduit International has higher revenue and earnings than Whole Earth Brands.

Summary

Schweitzer-Mauduit International beats Whole Earth Brands on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Whole Earth Brands (NASDAQ:FREE) and e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and e.l.f. Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Whole Earth Brands and e.l.f. Beauty, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Whole Earth Brands currently has a consensus target price of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 50.27%. e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus target price of $28.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 1.82%. Given Whole Earth Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Whole Earth Brands is more favorable than e.l.f. Beauty.

Volatility and Risk

Whole Earth Brands has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Whole Earth Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and e.l.f. Beauty's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

e.l.f. Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Whole Earth Brands.

Summary

e.l.f. Beauty beats Whole Earth Brands on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Whole Earth Brands (NASDAQ:FREE) and Universal (NYSE:UVV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Universal's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Whole Earth Brands and Universal, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Whole Earth Brands currently has a consensus target price of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 50.27%. Given Whole Earth Brands' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Whole Earth Brands is more favorable than Universal.

Volatility and Risk

Whole Earth Brands has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Universal has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

68.4% of Whole Earth Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of Universal shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Universal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Whole Earth Brands and Universal's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Universal has higher revenue and earnings than Whole Earth Brands.

Summary

Universal beats Whole Earth Brands on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.