NASDAQ:GRIN

Grindrod Shipping Competitors

$7.22
+0.12 (+1.69 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.10
Now: $7.22
$7.25
50-Day Range
$6.12
MA: $6.89
$7.58
52-Week Range
$2.18
Now: $7.22
$7.80
Volume19,579 shs
Average Volume39,069 shs
Market CapitalizationN/A
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.94

Competitors

Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) Vs. ATCO, EURN, SBLK, FRO, CMRE, and DAC

Should you be buying GRIN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "deep sea foreign transportation of freight" are considered alternatives and competitors to Grindrod Shipping, including Atlas (ATCO), Euronav (EURN), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), Frontline (FRO), Costamare (CMRE), and Danaos (DAC).

Atlas (NYSE:ATCO) and Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Atlas has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grindrod Shipping has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Atlas and Grindrod Shipping's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Atlas21.49%9.14%3.64%
Grindrod ShippingN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Atlas and Grindrod Shipping, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Atlas03302.50
Grindrod Shipping0000N/A

Atlas presently has a consensus target price of $17.7857, suggesting a potential upside of 24.64%. Given Atlas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Atlas is more favorable than Grindrod Shipping.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Atlas and Grindrod Shipping's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atlas$1.13 billion3.11$439.10 million$0.7818.29
Grindrod Shipping$331.05 millionN/AN/A($1.11)-6.50

Atlas has higher revenue and earnings than Grindrod Shipping. Grindrod Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atlas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

52.1% of Atlas shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Atlas beats Grindrod Shipping on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) and Euronav (NYSE:EURN) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Grindrod Shipping and Euronav's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grindrod Shipping$331.05 millionN/AN/A($1.11)-6.50
Euronav$932.38 million1.97$112.23 million$0.5515.20

Euronav has higher revenue and earnings than Grindrod Shipping. Grindrod Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Euronav, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Grindrod Shipping has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Euronav has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.3% of Euronav shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Grindrod Shipping and Euronav's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Grindrod ShippingN/AN/AN/A
Euronav47.83%27.32%16.50%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Grindrod Shipping and Euronav, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Grindrod Shipping0000N/A
Euronav03502.63

Euronav has a consensus target price of $12.3750, indicating a potential upside of 48.03%. Given Euronav's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Euronav is more favorable than Grindrod Shipping.

Summary

Euronav beats Grindrod Shipping on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) and Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Star Bulk Carriers and Grindrod Shipping's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Star Bulk Carriers0.71%1.41%0.67%
Grindrod ShippingN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Star Bulk Carriers and Grindrod Shipping's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Star Bulk Carriers$821.36 million1.93$-16,200,000.00$0.2661.50
Grindrod Shipping$331.05 millionN/AN/A($1.11)-6.50

Grindrod Shipping has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Star Bulk Carriers. Grindrod Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Bulk Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grindrod Shipping has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

55.2% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Star Bulk Carriers and Grindrod Shipping, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Star Bulk Carriers01302.75
Grindrod Shipping0000N/A

Star Bulk Carriers currently has a consensus price target of $13.20, indicating a potential downside of 17.45%. Given Star Bulk Carriers' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than Grindrod Shipping.

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats Grindrod Shipping on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) and Frontline (NYSE:FRO) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Grindrod Shipping has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Frontline has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

21.9% of Frontline shares are held by institutional investors. 48.1% of Frontline shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Grindrod Shipping and Frontline, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Grindrod Shipping0000N/A
Frontline26101.89

Frontline has a consensus price target of $7.8080, suggesting a potential upside of 10.91%. Given Frontline's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Frontline is more favorable than Grindrod Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Grindrod Shipping and Frontline's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Grindrod ShippingN/AN/AN/A
Frontline38.35%34.28%13.95%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Grindrod Shipping and Frontline's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grindrod Shipping$331.05 millionN/AN/A($1.11)-6.50
Frontline$957.32 million1.45$139.97 million$0.828.59

Frontline has higher revenue and earnings than Grindrod Shipping. Grindrod Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Frontline beats Grindrod Shipping on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) and Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Costamare and Grindrod Shipping's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Costamare3.80%11.59%5.34%
Grindrod ShippingN/AN/AN/A

Volatility & Risk

Costamare has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grindrod Shipping has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

26.6% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Costamare and Grindrod Shipping, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Costamare00203.00
Grindrod Shipping0000N/A

Costamare currently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.32%. Given Costamare's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Costamare is more favorable than Grindrod Shipping.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Costamare and Grindrod Shipping's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Costamare$478.11 million2.57$99 million$0.9111.03
Grindrod Shipping$331.05 millionN/AN/A($1.11)-6.50

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Grindrod Shipping. Grindrod Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Costamare beats Grindrod Shipping on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grindrod Shipping (NASDAQ:GRIN) and Danaos (NYSE:DAC) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Grindrod Shipping and Danaos, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Grindrod Shipping0000N/A
Danaos01202.67

Danaos has a consensus target price of $44.4167, indicating a potential downside of 16.37%. Given Danaos' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Danaos is more favorable than Grindrod Shipping.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.5% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Grindrod Shipping and Danaos' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Grindrod ShippingN/AN/AN/A
Danaos31.89%17.25%6.00%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Grindrod Shipping and Danaos' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grindrod Shipping$331.05 millionN/AN/A($1.11)-6.50
Danaos$447.24 million2.43$131.25 million$9.175.79

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Grindrod Shipping. Grindrod Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Grindrod Shipping has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Danaos beats Grindrod Shipping on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


Grindrod Shipping Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Atlas logo
ATCO
Atlas
2.1$14.27+1.3%$3.52 billion$1.13 billion15.51
Euronav logo
EURN
Euronav
1.9$8.36+0.1%$1.84 billion$932.38 million2.59Unusual Options Activity
Star Bulk Carriers logo
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
1.5$15.99+4.7%$1.59 billion$821.36 million319.86
Frontline logo
FRO
Frontline
1.7$7.04+0.7%$1.39 billion$957.32 million2.62
Costamare logo
CMRE
Costamare
1.6$10.04+2.2%$1.23 billion$478.11 million-91.26News Coverage
Danaos logo
DAC
Danaos
1.3$53.11+2.2%$1.09 billion$447.24 million8.51
Scorpio Tankers logo
STNG
Scorpio Tankers
2.3$18.33+1.8%$1.06 billion$704.33 million5.99
DHT logo
DHT
DHT
2.5$5.84+1.5%$997.46 million$535.07 million2.88
SFL logo
SFL
SFL
1.4$7.42+0.7%$950.69 million$458.85 million-22.48Decrease in Short Interest
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.4$41.50+0.2%$850.71 million$799.97 million79.81News Coverage
TORM logo
TRMD
TORM
1.2$8.73+0.1%$648.38 million$693 million4.20News Coverage
Navigator logo
NVGS
Navigator
2.1$9.65+3.1%$539.48 million$301.39 million-87.73Increase in Short Interest
Dorian LPG logo
LPG
Dorian LPG
1.5$12.90+0.7%$535.12 million$333.43 million8.78Decrease in Short Interest
Genco Shipping & Trading logo
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading
1.5$11.75+3.6%$492.47 million$389.50 million-3.11
Global Ship Lease logo
GSL
Global Ship Lease
1.6$13.57+1.5%$489.82 million$261.10 million12.01Increase in Short Interest
Eagle Bulk Shipping logo
EGLE
Eagle Bulk Shipping
1.3$37.33+5.0%$464.50 million$292.38 million-8.26Gap Down
Teekay logo
TK
Teekay
0.6$3.10+1.0%$313.44 million$1.92 billion-5.96Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Navios Maritime Partners logo
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners
1.6$26.97+0.1%$305.98 million$219.38 million-3.65
NMCI
Navios Maritime Containers
0.3$9.23+3.6%$299.48 million$141.53 million71.01
Diana Shipping logo
DSX
Diana Shipping
1.5$3.06+1.6%$273.18 million$220.73 million-1.81Increase in Short Interest
Safe Bulkers logo
SB
Safe Bulkers
1.0$2.35+0.9%$240.11 million$197.76 million-8.70Gap Down
Scorpio Bulkers logo
SALT
Scorpio Bulkers
1.6$19.53+0.2%$223.54 million$224.58 million-0.79
Capital Product Partners logo
CPLP
Capital Product Partners
1.7$11.11+1.8%$205.82 million$108.37 million7.31Decrease in Short Interest
Overseas Shipholding Group logo
OSG
Overseas Shipholding Group
1.3$2.36+1.3%$204.55 million$355.55 million5.13Increase in Short Interest
Tsakos Energy Navigation logo
TNP
Tsakos Energy Navigation
2.4$9.27+1.4%$174.10 million$597.45 million7.02Increase in Short Interest
Navios Maritime logo
NM
Navios Maritime
0.5$9.01+1.3%$143.08 million$482.45 million-0.53Increase in Short Interest
Seanergy Maritime logo
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime
1.0$0.91+7.7%$139.40 million$86.50 million-0.25Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
Pangaea Logistics Solutions logo
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
1.7$2.99+0.7%$136.40 million$412.20 million37.38Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Ardmore Shipping logo
ASC
Ardmore Shipping
2.2$3.97+3.3%$131.75 million$230.04 million8.45Analyst Downgrade
SEACOR Marine logo
SMHI
SEACOR Marine
0.9$5.07+0.2%$118.72 million$201.49 million-2.04
StealthGas logo
GASS
StealthGas
2.1$2.70+0.4%$102.22 million$144.26 million7.94Decrease in Short Interest
Euroseas logo
ESEA
Euroseas
1.3$11.50+8.2%$78.00 million$40.02 million32.86Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
TOPS
Top Ships
1.2$1.45+9.7%$57.76 million$66.09 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Navios Maritime Acquisition logo
NNA
Navios Maritime Acquisition
1.4$3.25+1.8%$55.50 million$280.12 million1.24Earnings Announcement
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Pyxis Tankers logo
PXS
Pyxis Tankers
0.7$0.85+0.0%$18.67 million$27.75 million-2.24Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
GLBS
Globus Maritime
0.7$4.07+0.7%$12.37 million$15.62 million0.00
Castor Maritime logo
CTRM
Castor Maritime
1.2$0.45+0.0%$1.08 million$5.97 million3.76Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.