Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives Competitors

Brooge Energy (NASDAQ:BROG) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

3.1% of Brooge Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Brooge Energy and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Brooge Energy and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Brooge Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Brooge Energy is more favorable than Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives.

Volatility and Risk

Brooge Energy has a beta of -0.44, meaning that its share price is 144% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Brooge Energy and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has higher revenue and earnings than Brooge Energy. Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooge Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats Brooge Energy on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cohn Robbins (NYSE:CRHC) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

21.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cohn Robbins and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Cohn Robbins and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is more favorable than Cohn Robbins.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cohn Robbins and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has higher revenue and earnings than Cohn Robbins.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats Cohn Robbins on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Apollo Strategic Growth Capital (NYSE:APSG) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

21.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Apollo Strategic Growth Capital and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Apollo Strategic Growth Capital and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is more favorable than Apollo Strategic Growth Capital.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Apollo Strategic Growth Capital and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has higher revenue and earnings than Apollo Strategic Growth Capital.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats Apollo Strategic Growth Capital on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Bain Capital Specialty Finance and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Bain Capital Specialty Finance and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Bain Capital Specialty Finance and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance presently has a consensus price target of $13.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 14.70%. Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is more favorable than Bain Capital Specialty Finance.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats Bain Capital Specialty Finance on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II (NYSE:GSAH) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has higher revenue and earnings than GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II.

Profitability

This table compares GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.0% of GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is more favorable than GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

CONX (NASDAQ:CONX) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CONX and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has higher revenue and earnings than CONX.

Profitability

This table compares CONX and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

21.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for CONX and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is more favorable than CONX.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats CONX on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.