Naked Brand Group Competitors

Naked Brand Group (NASDAQ:NAKD) and LiveXLive Media (NASDAQ:LIVX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.3% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of LiveXLive Media shares are held by institutional investors. 30.9% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.6% of LiveXLive Media shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Naked Brand Group and LiveXLive Media, as reported by MarketBeat.

LiveXLive Media has a consensus price target of $5.5417, indicating a potential upside of 131.87%. Given LiveXLive Media's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe LiveXLive Media is more favorable than Naked Brand Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Naked Brand Group and LiveXLive Media's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Naked Brand Group has higher revenue and earnings than LiveXLive Media.

Profitability

This table compares Naked Brand Group and LiveXLive Media's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Naked Brand Group has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LiveXLive Media has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Naked Brand Group beats LiveXLive Media on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Naked Brand Group (NASDAQ:NAKD) and Lincoln Educational Services (NASDAQ:LINC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Naked Brand Group has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Naked Brand Group and Lincoln Educational Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lincoln Educational Services has higher revenue and earnings than Naked Brand Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Naked Brand Group and Lincoln Educational Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Lincoln Educational Services has a consensus target price of $5.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 9.42%. Given Lincoln Educational Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lincoln Educational Services is more favorable than Naked Brand Group.

Profitability

This table compares Naked Brand Group and Lincoln Educational Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.3% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Lincoln Educational Services shares are held by institutional investors. 30.9% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.0% of Lincoln Educational Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lincoln Educational Services beats Naked Brand Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Naked Brand Group (NASDAQ:NAKD) and Cumulus Media (NASDAQ:CMLS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Naked Brand Group has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Naked Brand Group and Cumulus Media's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cumulus Media has higher revenue and earnings than Naked Brand Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Naked Brand Group and Cumulus Media, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cumulus Media has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 15.15%. Given Cumulus Media's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cumulus Media is more favorable than Naked Brand Group.

Profitability

This table compares Naked Brand Group and Cumulus Media's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.3% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Cumulus Media shares are held by institutional investors. 30.9% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Cumulus Media shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cumulus Media beats Naked Brand Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bassett Furniture Industries (NASDAQ:BSET) and Naked Brand Group (NASDAQ:NAKD) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Bassett Furniture Industries and Naked Brand Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Bassett Furniture Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Naked Brand Group.

Profitability

This table compares Bassett Furniture Industries and Naked Brand Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

54.4% of Bassett Furniture Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Bassett Furniture Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.9% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Bassett Furniture Industries and Naked Brand Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Bassett Furniture Industries presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential downside of 70.02%. Given Bassett Furniture Industries' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more favorable than Naked Brand Group.

Volatility & Risk

Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Naked Brand Group has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Naked Brand Group (NASDAQ:NAKD) and StoneMor (NYSE:STON) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Naked Brand Group and StoneMor's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Naked Brand Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than StoneMor.

Risk and Volatility

Naked Brand Group has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, StoneMor has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Naked Brand Group and StoneMor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.3% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of StoneMor shares are held by institutional investors. 30.9% of Naked Brand Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 69.9% of StoneMor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Naked Brand Group and StoneMor, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Naked Brand Group beats StoneMor on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Naked Brand Group (NASDAQ:NAKD) and Lazydays (NASDAQ:LAZY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Naked Brand Group has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lazydays has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its share price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Naked Brand Group and Lazydays' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lazydays has higher revenue and earnings than Naked Brand Group.

Profitability

This table compares Naked Brand Group and Lazydays' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.3% of Naked Brand Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.1% of Lazydays shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.9% of Naked Brand Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Lazydays shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Naked Brand Group and Lazydays, as provided by MarketBeat.

Lazydays has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.96%. Given Lazydays' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lazydays is more favorable than Naked Brand Group.

Summary

Lazydays beats Naked Brand Group on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.