S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NASDAQ:PAYA

Paya Competitors

$12.06
+0.34 (+2.90 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$11.55
Now: $12.06
$12.39
50-Day Range
$11.72
MA: $13.28
$14.13
52-Week Range
$10.38
Now: $12.06
$15.00
Volume1.90 million shs
Average Volume787,832 shs
Market Capitalization$1.41 billion
P/E Ratio150.77
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.05

Competitors

Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) Vs. VVNT, BTRS, IPOF, BFT, FSR, and IPOE

Should you be buying PAYA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "holding & other investment offices" are considered alternatives and competitors to Paya, including Vivint Smart Home (VVNT), BTRS (BTRS), Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI (IPOF), Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II (BFT), Fisker (FSR), and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V (IPOE).

Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) and Vivint Smart Home (NYSE:VVNT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Paya and Vivint Smart Home's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1867.00
Vivint Smart HomeN/AN/A$4.20 million$0.14121.43

Paya is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivint Smart Home, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Paya and Vivint Smart Home's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%
Vivint Smart HomeN/A-0.71%0.32%

Volatility and Risk

Paya has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vivint Smart Home has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Vivint Smart Home shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Paya shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Vivint Smart Home shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Paya and Vivint Smart Home, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Paya00503.00
Vivint Smart Home05102.17

Paya currently has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Vivint Smart Home has a consensus target price of $21.6667, indicating a potential upside of 27.45%. Given Paya's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Paya is more favorable than Vivint Smart Home.

Summary

Paya beats Vivint Smart Home on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) and BTRS (NASDAQ:BTRS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Paya and BTRS's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1867.00
BTRSN/AN/A$1.40 millionN/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares Paya and BTRS's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%
BTRSN/AN/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

Paya has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BTRS has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of BTRS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Paya shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Paya and BTRS, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Paya00503.00
BTRS00203.00

Paya currently has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. BTRS has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.18%. Given Paya's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Paya is more favorable than BTRS.

Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI (NYSE:IPOF) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Paya and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1867.00
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VIN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares Paya and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VIN/AN/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Paya shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Paya and Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Paya00503.00
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI0000N/A

Paya currently has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Given Paya's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Paya is more favorable than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI.

Summary

Paya beats Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) and Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE:BFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Paya and Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Paya00503.00
Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II0000N/A

Paya currently has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Given Paya's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Paya is more favorable than Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Paya and Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1867.00
Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares Paya and Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%
Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Paya shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Paya beats Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fisker (NYSE:FSR) and Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fisker and Paya, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fisker12602.56
Paya00503.00

Fisker presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.28%. Paya has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Given Paya's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Paya is more favorable than Fisker.

Risk & Volatility

Fisker has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Paya has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fisker and Paya's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FiskerN/AN/A$8.81 millionN/AN/A
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1867.00

Profitability

This table compares Fisker and Paya's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FiskerN/A26.40%0.23%
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.0% of Fisker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Paya shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fisker beats Paya on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V (NYSE:IPOE) and Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Paya, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V0000N/A
Paya00503.00

Paya has a consensus target price of $15.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.60%. Given Paya's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Paya is more favorable than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Paya's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
PayaN/AN/A$4.28 million$0.1867.00

Profitability

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Paya's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VN/AN/AN/A
PayaN/A-1.98%-0.03%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Paya shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Paya beats Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

pixel
Ad Tradewins
Are you ready to earn more income?
Let 10 time trading champion Chuck Hughes show you how to start making more income. Sign up today and receive his Trade of the Day eletter and a free copy of “Options Trading Made Easy”. 

Paya Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Vivint Smart Home logo
VVNT
Vivint Smart Home
1.6$17.00+2.2%$3.46 billionN/A121.43Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
BTRS
BTRS
1.9$16.90+3.6%$2.45 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
Gap Down
IPOF
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI
0.0$13.73+0.1%$1.97 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
BFT
Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II
1.0$15.21+0.9%$1.97 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Fisker logo
FSR
Fisker
1.2$28.50+24.3%$1.97 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
IPOE
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V
0.0$18.43+1.6%$1.85 billionN/A0.00Gap Down
STPK
Star Peak Energy Transition
0.2$34.18+6.6%$1.64 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
QS
QuantumScape
0.8$54.93+4.8%$1.58 billionN/A0.00Gap Down
PRCH
Porch Group
1.9$17.96+0.3%$1.46 billionN/A0.00
WPF
Foley Trasimene Acquisition
0.0$10.40+0.0%$1.35 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
JWS
Jaws Acquisition
0.2$14.32+0.3%$1.24 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
SBE
Switchback Energy Acquisition
1.6$30.83+6.8%$1.21 billionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
PRPB
CC Neuberger Principal Holdings II
0.0$10.68+0.5%$1.16 billionN/A0.00
ARKO
Arko
2.1$9.27+1.0%$1.15 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
BROG
Brooge Energy
1.2$10.40+0.0%$1.14 billion$44.08 million32.50
GSAH
GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II
0.4$12.02+1.3%$1.13 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
HPK
HighPeak Energy
0.0$12.29+8.2%$1.13 billionN/A0.00Gap Down
CRHC
Cohn Robbins
0.0$10.49+0.1%$1.09 billionN/A0.00
APSG
Apollo Strategic Growth Capital
0.0$10.49+1.2%$1.08 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
RTP
Reinvent Technology Partners
0.0$11.74+2.2%$1.01 billionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
CONX
CONX
0.0$10.34+0.1%$998.57 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
LGVW
Longview Acquisition
0.5$19.05+0.1%$985.84 millionN/A0.00
Artius Acquisition logo
AACQ
Artius Acquisition
0.2$10.88+3.2%$985.33 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Bain Capital Specialty Finance logo
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
1.5$14.06+0.5%$907.74 million$197.95 million-34.29Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
AGC
Altimeter Growth
0.0$12.95+0.8%$806.14 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
IPOD
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. IV
0.0$13.99+1.2%$804.43 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
AVAN
Avanti Acquisition
0.0$10.41+1.2%$804.17 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
NGA
Northern Genesis Acquisition
0.0$19.91+1.9%$795.05 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
SSPK
Silver Spike Acquisition
0.2$23.76+2.1%$742.50 millionN/A0.00
CIIC
CIIG Merger
1.9$22.93+5.1%$741.63 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Gap Down
VGAC
VG Acquisition
0.0$11.39+2.1%$736.42 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
DGNR
Dragoneer Growth Opportunities
0.0$10.56+5.2%$728.64 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
ACTC
ArcLight Clean Transition
0.0$20.79+1.4%$721.16 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Horizon Acquisition logo
HZAC
Horizon Acquisition
0.0$10.37+0.2%$705.14 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
GRSV
Gores Holdings V
0.0$10.70+0.4%$702.19 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Churchill Capital Corp II logo
CCX
Churchill Capital Corp II
0.3$10.04+0.1%$692.76 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
TREB
Trebia Acquisition
0.2$10.63+1.1%$687.63 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
DMYD
dMY Technology Group, Inc. II
1.7$19.04+4.4%$656.88 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
ETAC
E.Merge Technology Acquisition
0.0$10.16+0.7%$621.79 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
THCB
Tuscan
0.3$16.62+1.6%$589.79 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
GOAC
GO Acquisition
0.0$10.21+0.2%$587.08 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
JIH
Juniper Industrial
0.2$13.38+0.1%$577.01 millionN/A0.00
SEAH
Sports Entertainment Acquisition
0.0$10.22+0.0%$574.88 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
APXT
Apex Technology Acquisition
0.9$12.87+0.0%$573.49 millionN/A0.00
QELL
Qell Acquisition
0.0$11.92+2.7%$565.46 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
FMAC
FirstMark Horizon Acquisition
0.0$10.74+0.3%$555.80 millionN/A0.00
ACND
Ascendant Digital Acquisition
0.0$10.69+2.7%$553.21 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
SNPR
Tortoise Acquisition Corp. II
0.0$12.74+4.0%$549.41 millionN/A0.00
DMYI
dMY Technology Group, Inc. III
0.0$14.47+9.3%$548.50 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
EQD
Equity Distribution Acquisition
0.0$10.41+0.1%$538.72 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 3/1/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.