NASDAQ:PFMT

Performant Financial Competitors

$2.22
-0.08 (-3.48 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.18
Now: $2.22
$2.31
50-Day Range
$1.23
MA: $1.84
$2.80
52-Week Range
$0.54
Now: $2.22
$3.21
Volume618,824 shs
Average Volume3.01 million shs
Market Capitalization$121.71 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta-0.79

Competitors

Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) Vs. CCRN, PRTH, RGP, FTHM, FC, and BBCP

Should you be buying PFMT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "business services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Performant Financial, including Cross Country Healthcare (CCRN), Priority Technology (PRTH), Resources Connection (RGP), Fathom (FTHM), Franklin Covey (FC), and Concrete Pumping (BBCP).

Cross Country Healthcare (NASDAQ:CCRN) and Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Cross Country Healthcare and Performant Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cross Country Healthcare-2.24%8.11%3.42%
Performant Financial-13.51%9.54%3.18%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Cross Country Healthcare and Performant Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cross Country Healthcare13402.38
Performant Financial0000N/A

Cross Country Healthcare presently has a consensus price target of $9.7857, indicating a potential downside of 22.76%. Given Cross Country Healthcare's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cross Country Healthcare is more favorable than Performant Financial.

Volatility & Risk

Cross Country Healthcare has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Performant Financial has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.4% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Performant Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of Performant Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cross Country Healthcare and Performant Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cross Country Healthcare$822.22 million0.58$-57,710,000.00$0.1584.47
Performant Financial$150.43 million0.81$-26,820,000.00($0.40)-5.55

Performant Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cross Country Healthcare. Performant Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cross Country Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cross Country Healthcare beats Performant Financial on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Priority Technology (NASDAQ:PRTH) and Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Priority Technology and Performant Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Priority Technology$371.85 million1.24$-33,590,000.00($0.50)-13.62
Performant Financial$150.43 million0.81$-26,820,000.00($0.40)-5.55

Performant Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Priority Technology. Priority Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performant Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Priority Technology and Performant Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Priority Technology00303.00
Performant Financial0000N/A

Priority Technology presently has a consensus price target of $15.75, suggesting a potential upside of 131.28%. Given Priority Technology's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Priority Technology is more favorable than Performant Financial.

Profitability

This table compares Priority Technology and Performant Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Priority Technology4.92%N/A-14.70%
Performant Financial-13.51%9.54%3.18%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

5.6% of Priority Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Performant Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 88.7% of Priority Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of Performant Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Priority Technology has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Performant Financial has a beta of -0.79, meaning that its share price is 179% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Priority Technology beats Performant Financial on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Performant Financial has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its share price is 179% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

47.0% of Performant Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.2% of Resources Connection shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.7% of Performant Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Resources Connection shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Performant Financial and Resources Connection's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Performant Financial-13.51%9.54%3.18%
Resources Connection1.90%7.25%4.32%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Performant Financial and Resources Connection, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Performant Financial0000N/A
Resources Connection00103.00

Resources Connection has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.53%. Given Resources Connection's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than Performant Financial.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Performant Financial and Resources Connection's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performant Financial$150.43 million0.81$-26,820,000.00($0.40)-5.55
Resources Connection$703.35 million0.65$28.28 million$0.9814.23

Resources Connection has higher revenue and earnings than Performant Financial. Performant Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resources Connection, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Resources Connection beats Performant Financial on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fathom (NASDAQ:FTHM) and Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fathom and Performant Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fathom00203.00
Performant Financial0000N/A

Fathom currently has a consensus price target of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 73.95%. Given Fathom's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fathom is more favorable than Performant Financial.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fathom and Performant Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FathomN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Performant Financial$150.43 million0.81$-26,820,000.00($0.40)-5.55

Fathom has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Performant Financial.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

15.1% of Fathom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Performant Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.7% of Performant Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Fathom and Performant Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FathomN/AN/AN/A
Performant Financial-13.51%9.54%3.18%

Summary

Performant Financial beats Fathom on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) and Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Performant Financial has a beta of -0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Franklin Covey has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Performant Financial and Franklin Covey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Performant Financial-13.51%9.54%3.18%
Franklin Covey-5.20%2.45%0.76%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

47.0% of Performant Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.6% of Franklin Covey shares are held by institutional investors. 13.7% of Performant Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of Franklin Covey shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Performant Financial and Franklin Covey's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performant Financial$150.43 million0.81$-26,820,000.00($0.40)-5.55
Franklin Covey$198.46 million2.14$-9,440,000.00$0.14214.00

Franklin Covey has higher revenue and earnings than Performant Financial. Performant Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Covey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Performant Financial and Franklin Covey, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Performant Financial0000N/A
Franklin Covey01302.75

Franklin Covey has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.81%. Given Franklin Covey's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Franklin Covey is more favorable than Performant Financial.

Summary

Franklin Covey beats Performant Financial on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Performant Financial (NASDAQ:PFMT) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

47.0% of Performant Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.7% of Performant Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.4% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Performant Financial and Concrete Pumping, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Performant Financial0000N/A
Concrete Pumping01402.80

Concrete Pumping has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential downside of 27.98%. Given Concrete Pumping's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Concrete Pumping is more favorable than Performant Financial.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Performant Financial and Concrete Pumping's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performant Financial$150.43 million0.81$-26,820,000.00($0.40)-5.55
Concrete Pumping$304.30 million1.35$-60,100,000.00($0.09)-81.00

Performant Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Concrete Pumping. Concrete Pumping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performant Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Performant Financial and Concrete Pumping's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Performant Financial-13.51%9.54%3.18%
Concrete Pumping-20.04%-2.09%-0.73%

Volatility & Risk

Performant Financial has a beta of -0.79, indicating that its share price is 179% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Concrete Pumping beats Performant Financial on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Performant Financial Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Cross Country Healthcare logo
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare
1.1$12.67-0.2%$475.29 million$822.22 million-24.37News Coverage
Priority Technology logo
PRTH
Priority Technology
1.7$6.81-1.2%$460.62 million$371.85 million24.32
Resources Connection logo
RGP
Resources Connection
1.7$13.95-1.7%$457.88 million$703.35 million36.71Analyst Upgrade
Fathom logo
FTHM
Fathom
1.4$31.33-1.4%$435.55 millionN/A0.00
Franklin Covey logo
FC
Franklin Covey
1.4$29.96-1.3%$423.81 million$198.46 million-42.80
Concrete Pumping logo
BBCP
Concrete Pumping
1.1$7.29-3.4%$411.66 million$304.30 million-6.08
IBEX logo
IBEX
IBEX
1.4$22.30-0.3%$410.05 million$405.14 million26.55Gap Down
ShotSpotter logo
SSTI
ShotSpotter
1.5$34.09-2.0%$397.08 million$40.75 million148.22
R. R. Donnelley & Sons logo
RRD
R. R. Donnelley & Sons
0.8$5.21-4.4%$376.03 million$6.28 billion-2.22Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Digital Media Solutions logo
DMS
Digital Media Solutions
1.5$10.72-3.5%$359.24 millionN/A0.00
Luna Innovations logo
LUNA
Luna Innovations
1.5$11.14-2.3%$349.77 million$70.52 million61.89
Atento logo
ATTO
Atento
0.8$21.75-7.1%$349.45 million$1.71 billion-5.72Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Loop Industries logo
LOOP
Loop Industries
1.4$8.05-1.5%$341.43 millionN/A-19.17
National CineMedia logo
NCMI
National CineMedia
1.8$4.27-3.7%$338.82 million$444.80 million-28.46Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
StarTek logo
SRT
StarTek
1.3$8.10-1.2%$333.22 million$657.91 million-8.44News Coverage
Tufin Software Technologies logo
TUFN
Tufin Software Technologies
1.4$9.64-3.2%$322.78 million$103.27 million-8.93
Acacia Research logo
ACTG
Acacia Research
0.9$5.45-6.2%$285.33 million$11.25 million45.42
Fluent logo
FLNT
Fluent
1.5$3.45-6.1%$281.36 million$281.68 million86.27
RUHN
Ruhnn
0.4$3.40-0.0%$281.03 million$183.01 million-18.89News Coverage
uCloudlink Group logo
UCL
uCloudlink Group
0.0$9.97-1.1%$277.61 million$158.38 million0.00
HireQuest logo
HQI
HireQuest
1.3$19.47-0.1%$265.67 million$15.88 million34.77Increase in Short Interest
Foresight Autonomous logo
FRSX
Foresight Autonomous
1.2$4.10-6.3%$264.26 millionN/A-8.54Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group
0.0$13.80-0.7%$262.09 million$21.10 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
LKCO
Luokung Technology
1.0$0.96-5.2%$258.98 million$18.78 million0.00
QH
Quhuo
0.7$4.74-2.5%$252.26 million$295.30 million0.00Gap Up
comScore logo
SCOR
comScore
2.0$3.27-0.6%$247.82 million$388.64 million-4.04
MDC Partners logo
MDCA
MDC Partners
0.7$3.31-7.9%$244.03 million$1.42 billion-13.79News Coverage
Triterras logo
TRIT
Triterras
1.7$7.25-2.3%$234.22 millionN/A0.00
GSMG
Glory Star New Media Group
0.0$4.01-0.5%$233.28 millionN/A0.00
Mogo logo
MOGO
Mogo
1.1$6.82-1.9%$221.60 million$45.07 million-14.83
Cinedigm logo
CIDM
Cinedigm
1.3$1.17-7.7%$209.10 million$39.29 million-2.05Gap Up
Information Services Group logo
III
Information Services Group
1.3$4.31-0.2%$208.61 million$265.76 million71.85
PaySign logo
PAYS
PaySign
1.1$3.81-3.9%$192.20 million$34.67 million-63.50
Inspired Entertainment logo
INSE
Inspired Entertainment
1.2$8.20-7.4%$190.39 million$153.40 million-3.36Decrease in Short Interest
Aqua Metals logo
AQMS
Aqua Metals
0.8$2.63-3.4%$178.23 million$4.87 million-7.11News Coverage
ESSC
East Stone Acquisition
0.2$9.96-0.3%$176.32 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Tarena International logo
TEDU
Tarena International
0.5$3.09-1.3%$168.75 million$294.66 million0.00
Usio logo
USIO
Usio
1.1$6.33-2.7%$162.70 million$28.20 million-18.62Increase in Short Interest
Hill International logo
HIL
Hill International
0.8$2.73-4.8%$161.54 million$376.44 million24.82Increase in Short Interest
PFSweb logo
PFSW
PFSweb
1.4$7.25-0.1%$147.78 million$294.02 million-60.41
BGSF logo
BGSF
BGSF
2.2$13.42-0.6%$138.45 million$294.31 million74.56
DLH logo
DLHC
DLH
1.8$10.42-1.2%$130.71 million$209.18 million19.30Decrease in Short Interest
Zovio logo
ZVO
Zovio
1.8$3.61-8.3%$128.06 million$417.80 million-4.57
AstroNova logo
ALOT
AstroNova
1.0$17.08-4.3%$123.20 million$133.45 million-131.38High Trading Volume
Inpixon logo
INPX
Inpixon
0.7$1.13-0.9%$114.56 million$6.30 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
China Customer Relations Centers logo
CCRC
China Customer Relations Centers
0.5$6.21-0.0%$113.83 million$173.41 million0.00
Alithya Group logo
ALYA
Alithya Group
0.6$2.12-3.3%$108.91 million$210.26 million-3.59
Fang logo
SFUN
Fang
0.6$11.69-0.5%$104.91 million$219.71 million-2.10
Boxlight logo
BOXL
Boxlight
1.4$1.82-3.8%$103.27 million$33.03 million-2.89
Code Chain New Continent logo
CCNC
Code Chain New Continent
0.2$2.80-1.1%$101.76 million$19.58 million0.00News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/20/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.